Argument from incredulity is one of the most popular fallacies among truthers. The standard structure of the argument is that experts are all liars and your own uneducated gut feeling is what we should listen to. Just look at the videos and it is just obvious. It has nothing to do with logic though.

She is a smart lady.
What the OS fails to explain is that even if temperatures did reach 2,600F, (enough to melt steel) the entire structure of the tower would be acting as a heat sink, carrying heat away from the fires themselves. Bottom line is that temperatures would have had to been even hotter than 2,600 in order to melt steel - something only possible as she says through an exothermic chemical reaction.

No where in the OS does anyone claim the temperature reached 2500 degrees.

Just another misconception from the gullible crowd.

Originally posted by samkent
No where in the OS does anyone claim the temperature reached 2500 degrees.

Just another misconception from the gullible crowd.

Not to mention, no where in any of the reports does anyone claim the fires melted the steel. The fires only needed to be hot enough for the steel to lose it's structural integrity, about half the temperature where steel begins to melt. Blacksmiths has known for some 10,000 years that iron doesn't need to be actually melted for it to bend.

Before these self declared truthers actually renounce the so-called official story it would behoove them to at least know what the official story actually is first.

---

---

not to mention the floods of molten metal pouring from the buildings before they were demolished, or was that molten aluminum from the aeroplanes... oh no that burns silver not red... hmmm

If there were floods of molten metal (as you call them) in addition to the fires we all seen, wouldn’t that put at risk the wiring and other equipment needed for controlled demo?

Or is there another plausible explanation that covers the collapse and fire and molten metal?

Excellent video op thanks for sharing. Science doesnt lie but unfortunately theres alot of ignorant people roaming the earth who refuse logic thought. Hopely one day the truth will prevail and the dead will recieve justice

Is the title of this thread meant to read "One Smart Chick"?

If so have I fallen into the hot tub time machine? I mean, really - "Chick"?

The part at 3:00 with the mechanic telling her the engine burned up because of no oil was hilarious. Yeah, women don't know crap about cars.

But if it is so obvious that the official story can't be true because of physics and thermodynamics then why haven't the vast majority of engineers come out and said so in almost TEN YEARS?

This is some weird psychological bull#. Do our school produce lots of geek wimps that won't challenge authority?

It should have at least been determined within SIX MONTHS that airliners could not do that to skyscrapers that big. And then the engineers don't demand info as simple as the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every level.

psik