It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As we were getting ready to move on, two officers approached us. Amongst themselves they debated whether the children’s toy next to us meant that we were there with a child. Then they asked us, “Are you here with a child?” We told them no. One of the cops moved on to the couple on a bench nearby, also ostensibly childless, while the other one asked for our IDs. We handed them over and soon we were being guarded by this cop as his partner took our IDs to their police car. My friend and I were confused. We had seen parks with gates that had a sign clearly stating that adults without children were not allowed in. This park had no such sign.
When the cop that was guarding us asked if we had ever gotten summonses before, I asked him if he could show me the sign that alerted people to the fact that they were about to commit a violation by sitting on a bench. We looked at the sign together. “That? I’m supposed to read that?” I asked. He said yes. It was a list of about fifteen park regulations. You would have to be no more than three feet away from it in order to read it. It looked something like this. Except there were no bullet points. Would they issue a kid a summons for standing on the swings? Or an adult, in the company of a child, a summons for taking off her shoes? According to the violation we got, 1-03(c2), “not complying with park signs,” they could do that. Based on my experience, I actually think they would.
Pawn takes rook, check mate! As everyone had hoped those rascally Inwood chess players were vindicated in court today when a judge threw out the NYPD's case, saying that summonses were wrong. Which—since the tickets were for being in a park after hours and were written at 2 p.m.—they were. Of course, this doesn't mean that cops looking to fill quotas won't be coming after more chess players. Norman Siegel, who represented the players, advises adults to stay away from chess tables near playgrounds, since quota-filling cops can always cite a different Parks provision in future cases.
Originally posted by starwarsisreal
With the US becoming increasingly more and more autocratic I'm sure we'll see a massive uprising due to the loss of freedoms
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
bed stuy ?
the only reason for these park regs is to help curb drug deals I bet
kinda silly, but once it is on the books, you have to enforce it uniformly lest you be labelled a "profiler"
a better idea would be to blast kids TV show theme songs
it had nothing to do with doughnuts, it's a loitering deal designed to battle drug deals
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
bed stuy ?
the only reason for these park regs is to help curb drug deals I bet
kinda silly, but once it is on the books, you have to enforce it uniformly lest you be labelled a "profiler"
a better idea would be to blast kids TV show theme songs
it had nothing to do with doughnuts, it's a loitering deal designed to battle drug deals
Where did he go? to the area behind the game where all the teens and 20 something girls were laying out in their bikinis. And what, you ask, did he do next? Pretended to be playing with his ipod as he snapped photos of the girls. He would wander thru the field and walk right next to the girls, pretending not to look but the ipod was position between the girls legs, at their bodies etc.