Hippies lying down in front of cars getting run over., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 39 times


reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 06:34 PM by j-man
reply to post by Somehumanbeing



Headlinewise you are very correct, but as I stated in my first post I don't think people sit in front of cars with the intention to get run over, but just to hit society where it hurts... If only a little.
Furthermore I am not really promoting this kind of protest, I am merely pointing out that running someone over is something you should try not to do.. Even if he is very inconvieniently (not from US no idea how to spell it) standing in front of your car...


reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 06:35 PM by dolphinfan
reply to post by OmegaLogos



Pedestrians have the right of way, but that does not give the pedestrian the right to jump into traffic and have the expectation that they will not be hit, nor if they are hit, have any grievance against the driver. Traffic protests have been effective in the past (Al Sharpton has used them several times) and they do not require the idiocy of laying down in front of a car, where someone, who is moving only a couple of miles an hour and likely not paying fantastic attention due to that speed from running over them.

While a sad event for all involved, a good day for the gene pool


reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 06:39 PM by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by SaturnFX





so, whats some good alternatives then?


Non acquiescence is a far stronger action than protest. It has been the so called "Personal Income Tax" that has facilitated this dubious military might of the United States, and most people have not even been made statutorily liable for any "income tax" and yet make themselves liable by filing a valid tax return and then signing under penalty of perjury that "all of the above is true and correct" which includes their liability. If most people are not even liable for the so called "income tax" then why the hell are they paying it? Stop feeding the beast if you don't want that beast to grow to uncontrollable proportions.


reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 06:42 PM by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by OmegaLogos



Yes, pedestrians do have the right of way. They also have the right to be stupid. That doesn't make it advisable. Strategy is key in many circumstances, and under this circumstance, I do not think the failed strategy should be lauded.


reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 06:42 PM by Somehumanbeing
reply to post by j-man



reply to post by j-man



Ah, I see, well, I agree with that aswell. Sure the old man that ran them over probably did so out of frustration as Kaploink has stated but honestly, if some people blocked me as I was taking a loved one to hospital because I feared for their life, I would try to get around it, and end up running them over if they didn't move out of the way. As another poster stated, calling the man a "coward" is excessive, but sure he is not in the right either, but then again I still believe the protestors deserved getting run over for sitting in the middle of the road in peak hour traffic. Just as you or I deserve getting burnt if I put my hand over a flame for too long.


reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 06:46 PM by Somehumanbeing
reply to post by TupacShakur



Not the first instance of an Angry Old-Man going berserk

reply to post by ladyinwaiting



He got charged with homicide. I'm not defending the angry old man, i'm just indicating that i understand his frustration. I just hope the people he ran over were charged atleast with obstructing traffic too. It IS illegal.
edit on 6-6-2011 by Somehumanbeing because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 06:47 PM by j-man
reply to post by Somehumanbeing


Well, I suppose we don't have to feel the same about it...


reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 06:47 PM by MaxNormal
reply to post by Beyond Creation



Did not happen, look it up was all B.S. Two wrongs do not make a right, put em all in jail protesters and drivers. Then do not publicise it because idiots will just do the same.



reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 06:55 PM by Somehumanbeing
reply to post by JudasIscariot



I doubt they care, they are probably just going with the flow that their friends provide. To "rebel" so to speak, to find something that they all can be a part of and have fun causing problems for other people in a manner that is seen as "brave".

This is how you try to cause change in a society that ignores protestors frequently:

Revolutionary Left Movement
Manuel Rodriguez Patriotic Front
American Revolutionary War
2011 Lybian Civil War
edit on 6-6-2011 by Somehumanbeing because: (no reason given)
edit on 6-6-2011 by Somehumanbeing because: (no reason given)


This is not the 60s or 70s where we were JUST introduced to the war footage from vietnam, when people lost their innocence and naivete regarding war. Now, people are indoctrinated and desensitized by War movies, television, history channel and video games to the point that war is not that "horrible" as it was before. With this prevalent mindset in people today, you cannot cause change by merely lying down on the road and hope to get run over.
edit on 6-6-2011 by Somehumanbeing because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 07:01 PM by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by gimme_some_truth





Pft, tell that to the founding fathers.


The Founding Fathers did much more than protest, and if you honestly believe that England just backed off because a bunch of colonist sat their asses down in front of horse and carriages then perhaps you might consider working a little harder at studying the history of Revolutionary War of 1776.



Tell that to the civil rights protestors of the 50's 60's and 70's.


The so called "civil rights" protestors are as much a part of the problem today as are the apathetic. Unlike Dr. King, Malcolm X understood the profound problem with demanding civil rights and instead called for an assertion of unalienable rights.

Civil rights are legal rights and legal rights are rights granted to people by governments. What can be granted by government can be taken away by government. Make no mistakes about it, the arrogance of the Patriot Act, as well as the plethora of other intrusive acts of legislation, are directly related to the indoctrinated who proudly pat themselves on the back and demand respect because they "marched on Washington with Dr. King". Today, very few people talk about rights as being natural and unalienable, and those who do in the U.S. are branded "homegrown terrorists". Pfffftttt indeed. Thanks for all you've done to get us here, now pat yourself on the back and smugly tell more people how important their civil rights are.

Edit to answer this question:



Were these people powerless?


I never said anyone was powerless, and do not believe people are. What I did say that was in the end, protest is really just an admission of powerlessness. There is a big difference even if it is a nuanced one.
edit on 6-6-2011 by Jean Paul Zodeaux because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 07:06 PM by Carseller4
Originally posted by dolphinfan
reply to
post by Jean Paul Zodeaux



Indeed. I find it no different than the Rachel Corrie business. You kneel down in front of a bulldozer and bad things are going to happen to you. Thats the thing with shields, including the human type. They get hit with things, thats kind of their purpose.




First thing I thought of.

She has got to be the stupidest protester of all time. Kneeling in front of a bulldozer? Every time I picture this I chuckle a little bit.
edit on 6-6-2011 by Carseller4 because: 5 second edit rule



reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 07:07 PM by darius2025
reply to post by Somehumanbeing



I personally thought these were hillarious.

You protest by laying down? You lay down to die. A long time ago saw some idiot stand in front of a tank and everyone has to jump off the bridge now. I am not a psychopath and would never lay down in front of a car. You want to protest peacefully? Grab the keys out of everyone's ignition and throw them as far as you can. Don't lay down in front of a ton+ machine.

I love when people are willing to lay down their lives for useless non-issues... while we can't even muster a holler at all the serious stuff. I would be seriously pissed off if I was trying to get somewhere and I had a bunch of ignorant piss-ants trying to be brave. I'm sure i'd be punching some faces.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Do I have freedom FROM religion?
  Posted 2 days ago with 34 member flags
Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 3 days ago with 8 member flags
Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags
Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
Congress Revolts On Obama Plan That Would Ban ‘Buy American’
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags
Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 13 days ago with 3 member flags