Okay, since some chemtrailers have no idea that they have been preyed upon by certain people like Will Thomas, Len Horowitz, Tony Hilder, G Edward
Griffin, lets start showing evidence of it. Anyone should chime in with evidence, where people who promote chemtrails, have been less than
truthful
As anyone knowledgable about the history of the chemtrail hoax, Will Thomas was one of the, if not the, earliest promoter of it for commercial
purposes. He and Len Horowitz, together would promote it and have books, dvds, home remedies for sale. Will Thomas got involved in this, starting
around 99 or so, together will Len Horowitz who has moved onto a completely different con game since.
One of his very first stories to promote chemtrails, was this, about KC-135s over Canada, and leaving trails on the radars.
www.willthomasonline.net...
Again, I will dissect it for its "truthiness"
Dickie regularly visits Air Traffic Control at the Edmonton municipal airport to watch the chemplanes making repeated passes over the city. Blessed
with good friends at work in the tower, he has watched radar-identified KC-135s "on many occasions."
On Father's Day 2002, Dickie and an excited group of 12 year-olds watched two KC-135s tracked by radar as HA (High Altitude) targets flying at 34,000
and 36,000 feet - "one to the south, and one to the north of the city."
Both USAF tankers had flown south out of Alaska. As Dickie, the kids and the controllers watched, the big jets began making patterns over Edmonton -
"circuits" the controllers called it. "Petro 011" and "Petro 012" were working alone in "commanded airspace" from which all other aircraft were
excluded.
A tower facility does not have anything to do with high altitude traffic. Their radar is going to only show low altitude traffic and only in the
vicinity of their airport. The airspace controlled the Edmonton tower,, only goes up to 4600 ft MSL, and out to 7 miles. Everything he is talking
about, is handled by "Edmonton Centre" which is very possibly in an entirely different building.
No such thing as "commanded airspace" either.
The signature is significant," one radar operator commented, referring to a trail clearly visible on the scope extending for miles behind the KC-135.
In contrast, a JAL flight on the display left no contrail. Going outside, Dickie and several controllers scanned clear blue skies. They easily located
the KC-135 leaving its characteristic white-plume "signature". Visibility was outstanding. They also clearly identified the JAL airliner at a similar
flight level. It left no contrail at all.
Dropping some kind of powder, is not going to show up on a weather radar or air traffic control radar. First of all, something of that size will not
reflect enough anyways. Ever seen a dust or sandstorm storm on radar? No, and you wont either. Second of all, air traffic radars operate from
transponder returns for the most part. Even a formation of fighters will show up as one target, since only one of them will have their transponder on.
Radars are engineered to show objects of a certain size, and something of a powder or sand is definitely not something that would ever show up
Going outside, Dickie and several controllers scanned clear blue skies. They easily located the KC-135 leaving its characteristic white-plume
"signature". Visibility was outstanding. They also clearly identified the JAL airliner at a similar flight level. It left no contrail at all.
Yeah sure, the tower controllers are just going to all leave the tower cab and go outside while at work. They would get reprimanded or fired, for
them all leaving the tower cab to go outside. In Edmonton, they would have to leave the tower, take an elevator downstairs to the bottom of the
building, and walk outside. They cant just all go do that.
"We see these guys up here a lot," the radar techs told Dickie. "You should have seen it when they had the big summit up in Calgary. It was exciting
to watch them."
Someone in Edmonton is not going to say "up in Calgary" since Calgary is SOUTH of Edmonton. You slipped up there, Mr Thomas.
There could be no doubt about what was being left in the tankers' wake. Showing up on radar as "birdie feet" triangles, the reflective plumes also
showed up as "as a concentration of dots" in the radar-visible plume. Focusing on each plane with the click of cursor, "we could see different
contrails," Dickie described. Some were short and quickly vanished from the 'scopes. Other trails were thick, long and lingering - not contrails at
all.
This is the most damning of all and pretty conclusive to me that he just wrote it all himself. Here, he is actually claiming normal contrails can
show up on air traffic control radar, in addition to "chemtrails". If this was not proof he completely just wrote this fable, then there is nothing
else i could say. Contrails, and clouds for that matter since they are the same, do not show up on any kind of radar.
edit on 6-6-2011 by firepilot because: (no reason given)
?
