It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by poet1b
I have yet to see any evidence that these are not pyramids
Originally posted by Zamini
reply to post by silverbullett
Yeah I bet you did. I also bet the people who create/hype these stories up for revenue wish you could afford a holiday as well.
Pyramids made by mud and grass and poop, wow, the builders of that pyramid must have been bright?
Pyramids in Egypt is a different ballpark all together.
Originally posted by minkmouse
There must be a good video someplace of a debunking team going to Bosnia and pulling this research apart?
Originally posted by minkmouse
In the duration of this thread I've wrapped my head around some pretty heavy support for the Bosnian pyramids. The dudes 5 part lecture and the last vid posted got me thinking. I also see a lot of people saying they're nothing more than hill's...Fair enough but I gotta tell ya, the argument for is way stronger than the argument against at this point. I conclude this by way of the fact I noticed the "Hillers" have brought nothing to the table other than some "They're hills I tell ya and nothing more!" This smell's of opinion to me. There must be a good video someplace of a debunking team going to Bosnia and pulling this research apart?
Originally posted by ReconX
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
So come on give us the facts that you know it's all "hooey" (whatever that means?)
I believe that the reason this is rejected outright without clear logical reasoning is because it now shatters our paradigm of "history" which turns out to be a load of bunk.
A human only knows that which they have experienced, and can 'trust' those whom inform them if they choose.
We as a civilization are completely utterly ignorant of our past, and our institution's of schooling have no idea what they are talking about when it comes to our history in the long term.
Originally posted by HomerinNC
I thought C-14 couldnt date that far back?
Assuming the definition of a pyramid is a manmade structure (as opposed to a pyrmaidal shaped hill) I have seen no evidence that they are pyramids - and I've been following the story since it first broke.
The biggest clue is that there are comprised of natural bedrock - same as all the surrounding hills.
they only succeed at making themselves look like an idiot.
the idiot's calling card
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by Essan
Assuming the definition of a pyramid is a manmade structure (as opposed to a pyrmaidal shaped hill) I have seen no evidence that they are pyramids - and I've been following the story since it first broke.
And yet you provide no evidence whatsoever for your claims.
Originally posted by poet1b
Your bottom two pictures look like man made structures. The third picture looks very much like a wall built to shore up the hill.