reply to post by Sense9000
I'd just like to point out that the source you offered is extremely bias, in fact much more than wikipedia probably is. Also, a discovery of this
magnitude would most likely become internationally recognized, and rationally speaking, there is no logical reason why this would be covered up.
People are too fast to jump into conspiracy theories, this is an exciting discovery and for people to be making up reasons why it would be threatening
to present makes your argument look even more embarrassing, not that it is your doing.
When the public hear about this kind of thing on this kind of site they believe it with less evidence, especially due to the fact that the people who
contribute the most traffic are obviously saturated in conspiracy theories. It is ironic that the motto of this site is "DENY IGNORANCE" and yet
everyone presents their ideas confidently and with passion, despite being ignorant to the scientific concepts related to the issue. Passion and gut
feeling do not constitute reality, science constitutes reality.






