Oh good grief. It's not like Larry Flynt is highly respected by moderates and those slightly left of center (liberals don't exist in the United States). The majority of people view him as a porn king.

Anything Flynt touches is tainted...he can never be a "spokesman" for anything legit

I can see how people, especially "conservatives" would be offended by this statement. People make unthinking comments sometimes, we all say things we wish we hadn't, I think Larry gets enraged at how some people so easily believe and support someone like Palin. I understand his frustration.

Is it possible his comments were addressing "quality of life", something he understands probably more than most here. If you fight to keep someone alive knowing their life will be full of pain or a complete burden on another, then I can see the point. In this case, Palin has the ability and will to care for this child, but if she didn't, would you condemn her for it?

While we're putting universal labels and judgements on people, I have a question for you "conservatives".

"The People vs Larry Flynt" to me highlighted one of the most important decisions in American history and Larry Flynt gets 100% of the credit for making this happen. Like it or not, he understood that the freedoms America stands for should outweigh anything else. He was dead on in his reasoning and his eccentricities along with his infamy helped get him there.

Do you give him credit for this? or because of his other beliefs and adult products do you still bash everything about him?

You should thank Larry, not for him, YOU wouldn't be legally allowed to post things here against him or anyone else for that matter. Yes, you should also continue to criticize him when he deserves it or you feel the urge as it's your RIGHT. I've read many articles from Larry and overall agree with most of his opinions, he hates hypocrites and goes out of his way to expose them, I for one applaud him for this.

Originally posted by beezzer

Your thoughts?

My thoughts are that you first declare that you are not going to generalize and assign to all Liberals the same sentiment that a singular Liberal expressed...but then you do just that in the next sentence?

Originally posted by beezzer
The point I'm tring to make though, is not to lump all liberals into his category of hate, but to isolate a gowing trend of hatred that is taking place in America.

Ironic, that the party that preachs tolerance and diversity is the same that embraces a man who abhors a woman and her child because she didn't get an abortion.

My other thought is that you at first seem to take the noble stance that all life has value and then choose to abase this man's handicap?

Originally posted by beezzer
Funny also, that this dirtbag is a lump of flesh in a wheelchair

As for Larry Flint? Who cares? I don't look to celebrities for moral or political guidance. Publishing a successful pornographic magazine or hosting "Celebrity Apprentice" are not credentials for moral wisdom or intelligence.

I have never thought to myself "who would Chuck Norris vote for?".

Who cares?

I honestly am befuddled by folks who think these opinions are important.

I am not confused as to why people try to unsuccessfully attach singular asinine views of celebrities to entire political philosophies though. Partisan trash. Intellectual feces. Not worth the calories required to fire the synapses to read the OP.

Larry Flynt is a puke.

Mentally challenged or not....it's absolutely fricking disgusting to say such degrading things about a child.