It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by ofhumandescent
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
Wake up..............who do you think now owns our government and many of the world's governments?
Hint: read my location.
Our government for the people and by the people is a illusion, we the people were sold out long ago.
Would you care to back up that claim with actualy proof please.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
reply to post by Missing Blue Sky
Perhaps you should read up on why they were dancing.
They were effectively demonstrating (according to a judge).
So using first amendment rights is repulsive, annoying, and bad form . . . . because it might disturb the peace.
What would Thomas Jefferson say to that?
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by Annee
what if dancing is your form of reverence? Is body slamming a form of reverence? Shouldn't that be outlawed in the name of reverence?
There are places you can dance.
It does not have to be this specific place - - - where I'd guess majority don't think of Slam Dancing as reverent behavior.
Go somewhere that allows Slam Dancing for reverence. I doubt those who want solemn reverence - - will be infringing on your place.
Its a big country - - you have choices.edit on 5-6-2011 by Annee because: (no reason given)