reply to post by randyvs
I have to wonder why this is such an obsession with some scientists ? They seem driven/determined that religion
steps on the toes of science.
The vast majority of scientists simply do not care nor conduct their researches in their perspective fields with any deity in mind., be they religious
What reason would a religious meteorologist have for blasting his love for his deity in every scientific journal he get's published in?
Religion being from man
Man is responsible for many things, including belief in deities.
I have no problem with religion being excluded from society. But only if all religion is excluded. Satan worship being amoung them.
I find that rather interesting considering that Jesus preached being tolerant of others. Why are Christians the most intolerant, hypocritical to their
faith, religious faction on this planet?
Yet scientists persist and many go off the deep end to endeavor, that God doesn't exist at all.
Pure uneducated bullcrap. The big bang theory was conceived by a priest, the very foundation of modern cosmology. There are plenty of examples of
scientists who attempt to explain the worl by including
god in their theories.
I think that is an extrordinary claim. I believe anyone making such a claim must first possess full knowledge of the universe. With out it, how
can one decide what does and does not exist ?
And yet you claim god does exist. By your own logic, you must be god himself, after all, that is an extraordinary claim.
So science from many directions, is desperate to prove God does not exist and should never be considered apart of any equasion.
Science, namely the scientific method has no bearing or care upon the existence or non existence of those things which cannot be proven to exist or
Gods existence is simply THE greatest existence.
I disagree. I strongly believe that Odin is THE greatest of all existence. Tried converting the heathen Hindu down the street, but he wouldn't
listen... So I burned his heretic arse on a stake.
In fact there simply must be an existence that owns existence.
That language implies the it must
be an aware entity that owns
existence. Why can not existence simply exist of it's own accord by
methods that we are not yet technologically developed enough to understand? You know... sort of how in biblical times the Earth was the center of all
I would rather serve a benevolent, all knowing, righteous, all powerful, loving God.
Yet the bible paints him as a very finicky easily pissed off and jealous being. He even admits to much.
And how far have they come really?
How far have Christians come? Not very much at all to be perfectly honest. They still refuse to follow the teaching of tolerance preached by Christ.
They've burned and destroyed countless cultural artifacts and knowledge that is now forever lost simply because it didn't agree with their Christian
faith. Hell, the Islams more closely adhere to God than the Christians do and if it weren't for their meticulous record keeping of ancient scientific
knowledge, we would probably still be living in the dark ages today. Just goes to show how important those terrorist scum are huh?
Have they come any closer to proving anything about the existance of God being a negative?
They're not trying to.
Many scientists use many avenues trying to prove or at least to make us believe God is a myth.
Those damn archeologists for accurately depicting the birth of Christianity and monotheism in general and the subsequent violent history that gave
rise to it's wide spread belief today. I mean, HOW DARE THEY!
I'm o the notion science goes nowhere without God.
Interesting considering science without god and after god has still progressed pretty well without faith in god or factoring god into it's
observations of our universe. And to note, it's already been well established for a few decades now that the shroud of Turin is a 15th century
forgery, a fake, a fraud, a hoax.