It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The GUT
If Science were ever to breach the mystery of creation I have a feeling it would be some scientist looking through the most powerful telescope and/or microscope the world has ever known and suddenly finding himself staring directly into the astounding & unblinking eye of God.
If Science could...which it can't.edit on 4-6-2011 by The GUT because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by randyvs
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
reply to post by randyvs
No true scientist would every try to disprove the existence of what many call "God". That's just idiotic, it can't be done. Nor, can it be proven that "God" exists. The reason why scientist would like to remove the idea of "God" from science is because it is unscientific to theorize about something that can neither be confirmed or denied by the scientific method.
So true, it's a coin toss either way always has been always will be. There are those that want God and the word of God kept out as to not interfere by way of his morals and laws.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by MrXYZ
You are right X I thank you.
I wonder if you and I can reach an agreement at this point. At least on the matter of ridicule. Would it be possible for us to negate the ridicule of each others .......... Well basically we are ridiculing each others lives when you get down tto brass tax. I would love not to see any more ridicule from you. I guarantee I don't like ridiculing yours. Possible ? I really don't like the hate it brings me. I'm not backing down but would welcome a truce of some sort. I don't expect you to give up your quest. I'm just positive you can do it without ridicule. As I know I can also.
edit on 1-8-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)edit on 1-8-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Akasirus
Ok I undertstand what you're getting at and agree but belief in Christ has much scientific proof.( the video I provided ) If you watch it closely enough it is bringing a lot of evidence to corroborate the resurrection that wasn't around ten and twenty years ago. Therefor the whole point of my thread is like the proof is right there in the pudding. For it's increasing because of science.
What the hell?
How can someone deny that?
Not only is there still zero scientific evidence for Christ, there is no genuine historical evidence.
it proves there was a guy called Jesus
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by MrXYZ
it proves there was a guy called Jesus
Really ? Where in the hell does it prove that?
Originally posted by chocise
I believe 'god's' existence has already been confirmed by science, or.... we are very close.
Hate quoting Einstein, as he's often so readily misquoted, but when asked, he did specifically say it was a question of definition, and I understand that completely: if one's notion is of an anthropomorphised, white haired, beared all-seeing gent behind a set of pearly gates is 'god', I'd have to disagree vehemently.
We have, today, seen some breaking news of bubble universes, no sign of a Higgs-Boson, and multiple 'Big Bangs'.
It's out there, for sure, we just can't grasp the reality, yet.edit on 3-8-2011 by chocise because: grammer
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Please correct this statement:
Science over the past 20 yrs, has produced more circumstantial evidence, toward corroborating the authenticity of The Shroud and the story behind it. than science has done to disprove or discredit the Shroud or any of the original it's claims. The things science is finding out are pointing in what direction?
Simple question simple answer please.
I don't want to call you a liar, but when you persist with crap like this, how do you expect to be taken seriously ? You don't even believe that yourself. So why ?
There must be an untold number of lame ass scholars out there. Maybe you should be correcting them.
The evidence for Christ's existence, physical or otherwise, amounts to absolutely nothing. There is none. I don't mind if you call me a liar. I would prefer that you show where this is exactly true though, without resorting to belief. Then I will become a Christian (well not really). It is hard when you find Santa isn't real.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Cogito, Ergo Sum
The evidence for Christ's existence, physical or otherwise, amounts to absolutely nothing. There is none. I don't mind if you call me a liar. I would prefer that you show where this is exactly true though, without resorting to belief. Then I will become a Christian (well not really). It is hard when you find Santa isn't real.
We're not talking about Santa and that was childish.