It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
You wrote (on 'official' logic):
["And where can I find the so-called "official one"?"]
Wiki has an excellent little article on inductive (and deductive) logic. I can find it for you, if you can't find it yourself (no offence, it's genuine offer of help, not patronizing).
Man, people quote Wiki like it's the Bible. Don't you know I could login right now and change the text to anything I want to? As long as it sounds reasonable, it would never be removed. I respect Wiki but the information there is just to untrustworthy. Point me to book or something other than Wiki.edit on 17-7-2011 by RealTruthSeeker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Originally posted by Tiger5
reply to post by randyvs
As a matter of fact many scientists believe in God and have their own religions.
Yeah, must be real then.
Originally posted by bogomil
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
You wrote (on 'official' logic):
["And where can I find the so-called "official one"?"]
Wiki has an excellent little article on inductive (and deductive) logic. I can find it for you, if you can't find it yourself (no offence, it's genuine offer of help, not patronizing).
Man, people quote Wiki like it's the Bible. Don't you know I could login right now and change the text to anything I want to? As long as it sounds reasonable, it would never be removed. I respect Wiki but the information there is just to untrustworthy. Point me to book or something other than Wiki.edit on 17-7-2011 by RealTruthSeeker because: (no reason given)
Then I could suggest, that you just write 'inductive deductive logic' in a search-machine and find a trustworthy source.
I'll definitely not insist in Wiki, partly because I have the same reservations as you. I just mentioned it, because the article is written in a language accessible for laymen such as e.g. me.
Why engage with the Atheist's posturings?
the burden of proof is on you. the bible is false until you can show us your religion is the correct one. btw you may want to talk to the jews before you talk to atheists.
Keep in mind that atheists have had just as long as theists to try and prove that God does or doesn't exist. In all that time atheist have only be able attract a very small group so what does that tell you?
Originally posted by disasternaut
A lot of what you are saying makes sense. I need to point out to some of my fellow ats brethren that calling the notion of God always being "stupid" is nonsense because God is holy and transcends what our finite human minds perceive as probable. In addition, God did seek vengeance on those who opposed him, but that was his right! God can do whatever he wants; he is the creator. Far be it from me to criticize the Lord on anything he chooses to do; we should really do is focus on his mercy that has been documented all through the Bible, even in the Old Testament.
ps. So Einstien was a creationist now ?
Originally posted by randyvs
Originally posted by disasternaut
A lot of what you are saying makes sense. I need to point out to some of my fellow ats brethren that calling the notion of God always being "stupid" is nonsense because God is holy and transcends what our finite human minds perceive as probable. In addition, God did seek vengeance on those who opposed him, but that was his right! God can do whatever he wants; he is the creator. Far be it from me to criticize the Lord on anything he chooses to do; we should really do is focus on his mercy that has been documented all through the Bible, even in the Old Testament.
Some damn good advice. And a perfect post.
Cogito
You've been reduced to blowing smoke signals. You and Bog and X all the same, can't betaken seriously.edit on 17-7-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
ps. So Einstien was a creationist now ?
Pantheism yes.edit on 17-7-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
We know, that the wave/particle somehow has existence beyond the presently observable cosmos, but what the existence is, we don't know.
We also don't know, if this trans-cosmic existence is an absolute vacuum, or a relative vacuum, though it's reasonable to suppose that it's relative.
...is similarly irrational. You promote yourself to referee, and expect everyone to go along with your self-proclaimed premises and your recurrent insinuations of who are the 'winners', 'loosers' etc.
Mathematically: How far is it from 1 to 0 (the end)?
Spy
Mathematically: How far is it from 1 to 0 (the end)?
It is the end. If we look at the ( 1 ) in terms of walking off the edge of a cliff and( 0 ) the fall ? There is no distance between (1) and (0).
No ? Just say'n.
Originally posted by randyvs
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Originally posted by Tiger5
reply to post by randyvs
As a matter of fact many scientists believe in God and have their own religions.
Yeah, must be real then.
I knew you'd come around.
People who dont want to believe in God usually are the people who blamed god for their ugly looks, lack of friends, money, or real joy.