It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
We don't even know the size of the universe...so we can't know if the energy/mass content stays the same. In fact, given that for all we know the universe is expanding, we will eventually reach a time where everything cools down to absolute zero.
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Though it sounds like you might be telling the universe what it "must be", via speculation. Do you have anything to show this claim would be more than an opinion? Such as someone observing and having knowledge/evidence of the universe in its entirety. You do realize the part of the universe we do have knowledge of might amount to much less than a pimple on a mountain? That might even be a huge exaggeration.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Not necessarily. Our universe could hypothetically be connected to another with an exchange of energy/matter happening. We don't know if that is the case or not. Look up multiverses
Originally posted by MrXYZ
We do find fossils on top of mountains...but not because of a global flood. Look up how mountains are formed and you'll understand why we find fossils on mountains
Moreso, the very fact that sedimentary evidence is often the most cited scientific argument in favor of the Great Flood shows how ridiculous your argument is.
If you expect me to believe that you can successfully model the geological consequences of such a global flood, you're just passing yourself for a greater fool than you already pose to be.
The Bible says that everything died, so what's your point?
There is no reason to believe that.
All plants died. The Bible says such, so again what's your point? You're attempting to argue that the Bible is wrong by telling us that it would have happened and it said that happened?
Why? Given the fact that many places (most notably the Nile Delta) rely on local floods to restore its fertility, why would it ruin the soil?
In so far, you haven't provided a single piece of evidence corroborating this claim, except your own opinion, which you are entitled to, but it is not evidence.
And God could exist, since we have apparently entered on the realm of "what could be" as evidence for arguments. If you believe in multiverses, you have absolutely no grounds to come here and complain about lack of evidence for God.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
A global flood would leave behind VERY SPECIFIC sedimental (sic) evidence. Of course sediments are everywhere, but none support the claim of a global flood.
Sure...if that person doesn't need air to survive. And either way, once in, he wouldn't get out. And to pass through the gorge, the human would have to be crushed unless he's a midget. For someone who claims to have studied the physiology of whales, you completely ignored some obvious flaws in your thinking.
You also clearly don't scuba dive. If you did, you'd realize the pressure whales have to cope with are far far far beyond anything a human can cope with. But who cares about facts, right?
Actually, sedimentary evidence is consistent with a global flood.
Prove that a human would be crushed when passing the gorge.
Also, just because a human can't do it, doesn't mean that an animal cannot. You need special gear when scuba diving, but whales were created by God with the necessary adaptations that allow them to survive. Collapsing lungs cause the air inside of a whale to be compressed, increasing its internal pressure to match the ocean's and protecting its internal organs from the pressure, including the stomach.
Calculate the amount of air inside a whale and compare with the amount of air a human needs. Take into consideration the frequency a whale inhales air, which would renew the supply, and demonstrate that a human could not survive. Since you're so adamant on your assertion, for the fourth time I ask for evidence.
Post a peer reviewed scientific article/paper proving your claims...otherwise all you're doing is preaching.
It might well be as you say, though how can this be genuinely known for something that is speculated to be limitless?
Seeing what scripture? There are many many many scriptures from many many many religions, so if you see them they must be true too? Seeing a book does not make the contents of the book true. I saw a Harry Potter book, are you saying that Harry Potter is a true story?
You think you're being smart I guess, but you look as though you might suffer from ADS, if you ask me. Maybe you havn't read through the thread. It should be obvious what scripture smart guy. But here it is all special for you. THE BIBLE. There you go sweety.
Now with atheism the universe becomes a "closed system " meaning there is no outside influence (God).
With believers the opposite is true. "open system"
If matter and energy can not increase or decrease and can not come from nothing ?
Where do matter and energy come from ?
Science fails to exclude God
Still waiting. Sorry, sometimes it's just really hard to get to ALL my fans. As far as scripture, The Bible ? Show me a better example of Gods word. There isn't one. Nothing comes close to the Bible.
Any one who seriously looks, will see. As far as proof of God or evidence ? How much of this thread have you read ? Also, you may need to more specific, as to what kind of evidence, you speak of ?
If we had scientific proof of God's existence, we would talk about the "science of God" rather than "faith in God". If we had scientific proof of God's existence, the study of God would be a scientific endeavor rather than a theological one. If we had scientific proof of God's existence, all religious people would be aligning on the God that had been scientifically proven to exist. Instead there are thousands of gods and religions.
Matter/energy mass (a object) can decrease/disappear; but its energy can not. Matter/energy mass is made up by energy.
The amount of mass in the Universe remains the same. Mass cannot be created unless by a process called "Pair Production" which produces both a particle and the equivalent anti-particle at the same time. Since anti-particles have negative mass, the mass of the Universe remains constant.
The energy of the Universe, however, doesn't. Energy is spent to produce work.
They do have some math backing up numbers like the weight of the Universe and its size. Although you are right that what we know of the Universe could be a mere pimple on a mountain, we have no evidence of it so far, present scientific evidence apparently points that to not to be the case, and speculating that "it could be otherwise" is wishful thinking, not how science is done.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by spy66
Matter/energy mass (a object) can decrease/disappear; but its energy can not. Matter/energy mass is made up by energy.
I think you're confused about the definitions of matter, energy, and mass. Energy can very well disappear...ever heard of radioactive decay?
reply to post by Ziltoid_the_Omniscient
And a man the believes in the koran will say the same exact thing and you do not aacept that as the truth so why would anyone accept you saying the bible is gods word?
Antiparticles do not have negative mass, but positive. In this reaction, energy is converted into matter, which is not conserved, and can be created or destroyed. Mass and energy are equivalent by e=mc2 formula, and are conserved. Mass and matter are different things.
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
There is a lot of evidence to confirm that humans are the result of evolution. Being skeptical of it is not necessarily a bad thing. Though unless you have evidence to prove otherwise, contrary claims will remain your unfounded opinion. As with your summation of the field of paleoanthropology. All you have done here is prove that you have your own opinion. Though I agree that we didn't evolve from the apes, as does the current evolutionary model. Though it does appear we share a common ancestor.
I still disagree with the evolution idea. Check out this video and tell me what you think. As always, approach with an open mind. This video makes since to me.
edit on 15-7-2011 by RealTruthSeeker because: (no reason given)edit on 15-7-2011 by RealTruthSeeker because: (no reason given)