It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by bogomil
From Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu ofcourse. Where else?
Evidence ?
Originally posted by bogomil
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by bogomil
From Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu ofcourse. Where else?
Evidence ?
Not in this case. I tried my hand at your method. It's called humour amongst non-believers; you are maybe familiar with the concept?
But if you're interested, it's not difficult to demonstrate, that this variety of a theist 'answer' has a higher reality-probability than yours. You just have to re-read the science-oriented part of this thread, and when you have understood it, I will return with further information.edit on 12-7-2011 by bogomil because: punctuation, syntax
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Where did everything come from then ? If God didn't make it?
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Where did everything come from then ? If God didn't make it?
I don't know.
The fact that you claim to know, without allowing any possibility that you could be mistaken is something nobody else should take seriously.
I don't know
Hm... well, maybe science fails to disprove the Christian God, but I see no reason why a god has to be included. Scientific occurences do not require the help of a deity. So if you'd like to see science as the way your specific god, be it Allah, YHWH, or whomever, conducts the universe then do so. But I see no need for this.
Originally posted by WhiteLaces
reply to post by randyvs
Forgive me, but I simply do not want anything to do with Christianity and am probably becoming a Pagan soon. Please don't be rude or misunderstanding.
Originally posted by randyvs
Originally posted by WhiteLaces
reply to post by randyvs
Forgive me, but I simply do not want anything to do with Christianity and am probably becoming a Pagan soon. Please don't be rude or misunderstanding.
Too late, I already said a prayer and you're indoctrinated.
Despite your preconcieved notions ? I had no intentions Darlin.edit on 12-7-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)edit on 12-7-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Not more than Randys has failed to exclude the flying spaghetti monster. (Or the tea-pot on Saturn claim).
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Where did everything come from then ? If God didn't make it?
I don't know.
The fact that you claim to know, without allowing any possibility that you could be mistaken is something nobody else should take seriously.
And what evidence can you produce to prove what he is saying is false? I guess everything you say is fact, despite not having the answer. If you don't have the answer yourself how can you say someone is wrong? And don't give me that you don't have prove anything crap because as I said before, that is the biggest fallacy of all time.
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Now, where are your verifiable claims to God's existence that would make my stance unfounded or unreasonable.? I feel that belief in the Christian God is both unfounded and illogical and not worth entertaining even as a notion....
But that's why any of your snipes at myself are so fun for me.
You don't even understand that these arn't my claims. I claim nothing
It is normal to hate what you dont understand. Dont worry this is beyond human understanding. It is unwise to insist upon a literal interpretation of figurative statements of which the inaccuracy may, at any moment, be rendered evident by the progress of scientific discovery; but the fundamental propositions of religion, so far from having anything to fear from the discoveries of science, are strengthened and ennobled by being brought into harmony with those discoveries. And it is only when the religious sentiment shall have been enlightened by its union with scientific truth that religious belief, thus rendered invulnerable to the attacks of skepticism, will take the place of skepticism in the minds and hearts of men.
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Cogito, Ergo Sum
Where did everything come from then ? If God didn't make it?
I don't know.
The fact that you claim to know, without allowing any possibility that you could be mistaken is something nobody else should take seriously.
And what evidence can you produce to prove what he is saying is false? I guess everything you say is fact, despite not having the answer. If you don't have the answer yourself how can you say someone is wrong? And don't give me that you don't have prove anything crap because as I said before, that is the biggest fallacy of all time.
www.msnbc.msn.com...
edit on 12-7-2011 by Cogito, Ergo Sum because: for the heck of it.
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
The fact that I don't know where everything came from does not make someone else's claims of knowledge correct.
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
It is possible to provide facts without knowing the whole answer, why would you think otherwise?
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
No, we know that humans evolved from a common ancestor with the great apes. If there was any doubt (which there wasn't), the latest work in the fields of biology/genetics puts it to rest. Unless God looks like some ancient archaic primate. Evolution and speciation are known and observed. There is even work which shows evolution in progress within certain ethnic human groups over the last 10,000 years or so.
Your right there, I don't understand. It seems that your claims of knowledge have fuelled much resulting debate. Do you now retract the claim the you "know" god exists? Or that you have knowledge that "God did it" to explain creation? Or that Jones was an Athiest?
No need for smugness.
www.spiritwritings.com...
"Yes, judging from your point of view, because you think that you sum up everything in those terms; but you must understand that there are things which transcend the intelligence of the most intelligent man, and for which your language, limited to your ideas and sensations, has no expressions. Your reason tells you that God must possess those perfections in the supreme degree; for, if one of them were lacking, or were not possessed by Him in an infinite degree, He would riot be superior to all, and consequently would not be God. In order to be above all things, God must undergo no vicissitudes, He must have none of the imperfections of which the imagination can conceive."
God is eternal. If He had had a beginning, He must either have sprung from nothing, or have been created by some being anterior to Himself. It is thus that, step by step, we arrive at the idea of infinity and eternity.
God is unchangeable. If He were subject to change, the laws which rule the universe would have no stability.
God is immaterial, that is to say, that His nature differs from everything that we call matter, or otherwise. He would not be unchangeable, for He would be subject to the transformations of matter.
God is unique. If there were several Gods, there would be neither unity of plan nor unity of power in the ordaining of the universe.
God is all-powerful because He is unique. If He did not possess sovereign power, there would be something more powerful, or no less powerful, than Himself. He would not have created all things and those which He had not created would be the work of another God.
God is sovereignty just and good. The providential wisdom of the divine laws is revealed as clearly in the smallest things as in the greatest and this wisdom renders it impossible to doubt either His justice or His goodness.