Question about HAARP, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 4-6-2011 @ 11:33 AM by ADUB77
I have the basic understanding of HAARP, I just wanted to ask a question, in regards to the recent mass fires in Texas.

If Haarp can manipulate weather, like it is theorized, why would they not try to save Texas from burning up. I thought Texas was extremely popular to the "elites"

The first, and most obvious response, could be they don't want to blow there cover, in regards to controlling weather

The second, could be that HAARP is being controlled by "internationalists" with no american agenda and only profitting from destruction and creation.

The third could be that HAARP-weather control conspiracy simply is some sort of coping mechanism developoed by the insecure to try to justify the acts of mother nature. See, the conspiracy sheds hope to believe that maybe there are"internal" forces causing extreme weather.

This belief empowers a person to think they can stop what is happening or possibly beat it. This is the natural way to think in a situation that calls for explanation. You need a solution for a problem.

Understanding that "external" forces are at work. Understanding the saying "don't make plans for life, because it doesn't make plans for you" goes a long way these days.

Some things are out of man's control. HAARP wasn't here for the ice ages, decade long volcanic black outs, pole reversals, asteroid showers. As humans we want to assign the blame to something that can be fixed. That is the delusion we entertain in order to have an answer for the unknown.

HAARP most likely can tell when an earthquake is going to happen within a few days. That is why you see FEMA and UN soldiers and Red Cross arriving in places like Haiti early. I would believe that HAARP can monitor flux's in the ionoshpere to help proactively prepare for emergencies.

This post is a personal reflection and in no way should be taken as fact withour proper research and due dilligence


reply posted on 4-6-2011 @ 11:39 AM by connorromanow
reply to post by ADUB77



i think its still in a fairly developmental stage, and they are still having probl;ems getting it to do what they want where they want


reply posted on 4-6-2011 @ 06:34 PM by connorromanow
reply to post by ADUB77



well its like i was commenting the other day, fires in alberta, floods in manitoba, i thought haarp was supposed to prevent this


reply posted on 4-6-2011 @ 06:54 PM by devilishlyangelic23
Originally posted by connorromanow
reply to
post by ADUB77



well its like i was commenting the other day, fires in alberta, floods in manitoba, i thought haarp was supposed to prevent this


prevent those things? HAARP, in some people's opinion was designed to *create* these issues with weather and disasters, not protect us or save us from them...


reply posted on 4-6-2011 @ 07:18 PM by connorromanow
reply to post by devilishlyangelic23



the origional creators plan was to do things to benfit people, such as move excess rain to where it is needed its purpose was changed when the military took it over, in which weaponization would be a assumed intention
Pages:     ^^TOP^^