It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
first off I'd like to thank you for making this thread, it does point out flaws with the idea that ancient aliens visited us in the past. But the stories that are brought up in the Sumerian tablets and Adam and Eve are similar. So is a constant denial of the 'gods' of access to spiritual knowledge and constant mistreatment of humans the humans if they disobeyed by spreading plagues and even worse by even encouraging groups of people to embark on genocide campaigns claiming they were wicked even though they killed children and animals too( I will bring up more evidence in another post). This is not the way 'gods" are supposed to behave, the tower of babel story talks about how the 'gods' wanted division among people and this coincides with the current religous believes that an all-seeing god can solve all our problems and that we should fight 'final battles' that will lead to spiritual enlightenment and that an Antichrist who unites the world under one religion and one government basically uniting people should be feared and overthrown. Now that last point might be a bit of a reach but why would gods continue to encourage fighting among people when it seems that the opposite would lead to true spiritual knowledge.
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by DaveNorris
more possible than the intervention of an actual god figure, but less possible than mere fairytales.
If aliens did intervene we would expect some evidence beyond stories. Certainly its possible and arguably more possible than actual supernatural beings and events but I see no evidence that merits accepting either. It's not just this show but the entirety of ancient aliens claims that don't hold water and many of them rely on the same sort of fallacy, argument from ignorance, that god claims do. The old "here's a mystery, insert aliens as explanation" works about as well as "here's a mystery, insert gods as explanation".
Aliens are about as good an explanation for Nazca, Machu Picchu and the Great Pyramid as Zeus is a good explanation of lightning. In the end you're left with an argument from ignorance that has no real explanation power.
reply to post by Exuberant1
Any archeologist with actual solid evidence wouldn't need to fear their peers. It is true that supporting fringe ideas can be dangerous to one's career. However a scientist with conclusive evidence proving ancient aliens wouldn't need worry because they would become the most famous scientist in the history of the world for proving we are not and were not alone in the Universe. It might take some time for that to sink through the mainstream paradigm but in the end science must follow where the evidence leads.
As such I've seen no evidence, from any source, that leads to the conclusion of aliens visiting us now or in the past.edit on 17-7-2011 by Titen-Sxull because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by KingJames1337
Jehovah's Witnesses believe that Satan was originally a perfect angel who developed feelings of self-importance...
Originally posted by Paschar0
Originally posted by bigquestions
They present interesting theories that are fun to talk about, but the problem lies in that they present them all as facts with no other explanations
Much like religions of the world do. Make every claim as fact and take credit for things that are in no way provable.
They usually make a point of stating "Some believe" and "Is it possible that" on every single show, and it's not their job to present all the other possibilities that are already widely know or at least easily accessible. But I do agree they're already selling out somewhat. It's like they've already talked about the best content and now have to make new shows from what's left. It would be a shame if the "Jumped the Shark" so soon.
Originally posted by anti72
Originally posted by Paschar0
Originally posted by bigquestions
They present interesting theories that are fun to talk about, but the problem lies in that they present them all as facts with no other explanations
Much like religions of the world do. Make every claim as fact and take credit for things that are in no way provable.
They usually make a point of stating "Some believe" and "Is it possible that" on every single show, and it's not their job to present all the other possibilities that are already widely know or at least easily accessible. But I do agree they're already selling out somewhat. It's like they've already talked about the best content and now have to make new shows from what's left. It would be a shame if the "Jumped the Shark" so soon.
wrong. AAT cant provide ´evidence´, because it is no theory, just speculation, more like modern superstition.
religion is another cup of tea.
Originally posted by anti72
wrong. AAT cant provide ´evidence´, because it is no theory, just speculation, more like modern superstition.
religion is another cup of tea.