It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

USAF Flying Saucers

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 5 2004 @ 09:28 PM
link   
www.usafflyingsaucers.com...


www.usafflyingsaucers.com...

[edit on 5-8-2004 by dizznod]

[edit on 5-8-2004 by dizznod]

[edit on 11-8-2004 by John bull 1]




posted on Aug, 5 2004 @ 09:43 PM
link   
Can you expound on these items? I found it all to be a little confusing. What about those artist's renditions? The pictures I saw didn't look very flight worthy in my humble opinion.



posted on Aug, 5 2004 @ 09:44 PM
link   
these are fake. this has been discussed before. cant find the thread riht now but these have been discussed before.



posted on Aug, 6 2004 @ 09:55 PM
link   
Look at the "Top Secret" sketches...They are titled "FOR REAL". Would a USAF be using "for real" in their official documents.



posted on Aug, 6 2004 @ 09:55 PM
link   
This thread actually does points to alot of interesting and true information.

Firstly, The secret truth behind U.S. built flying wing disc aircraft only mentions "Jack" but that is Jack Pickett . He is a real person and he actually was in the Air Force.

Anyways, forget the pictures they're only artist renditions of pictures and crafts Jack saw, what interesting is the story itself.

Check out Flying Saucers-For Real!

there's alot of info, now it isn't clear that what he saw were actually responsible for ufo sightings from the past four decades, nor if the crafts were indeed capable of some of the speeds listed there, but if you scroll down to the THE CANADIAN CONNECTION section, I can confirm *some* of it is true.

John C. Frost *did* work for the Avro Aircraft Company in Malton Ontario .
Canada.

The US military *did* pay for AVRO.

As for the "These were the exact aircraft reported as "flying Saucers" in the U.S. during 1947" part, that's *false*.

Using conventional jet engines a disk shape makes for a sh!**y plane.
The AVRO's craft was more like a lawn mower.

Richard Miethe did *not* work for AVRO and maybe doesn't even exist.
From: Civilian Saucer Intelligence (New York) News Letter #11 7/15/59



posted on Aug, 6 2004 @ 10:46 PM
link   
I am sorry to say it is fake. When I first joined ATS, I had found this and put a post up. It was debunked within hours. The planes were made in photoshop. I know you, like I, felt they were real and so wanted to inform us of your discovery. Don't let this one let down stop you in your search for the truth.



posted on Aug, 10 2004 @ 08:31 PM
link   
I didnt think it was real. I thought it was funny the government will try anything to misdirect you.



posted on Aug, 11 2004 @ 10:43 AM
link   
Those are fake, but the truth of the matter is that the public is not informed, out of all the sightings of UFO's about 80 percent of them are actual USAF made aircraft, the rest can be seen as authentic.

It is because noone knows what the USAF is working with, noone knows what to call an UFO.

Anything can be an UFO, if I have never seen a F-15(Highly Unlikely) I would calle it an UFO.

People refer UFOs to alien spacecrafts, but that is not the true meaning of it, Unidentified Flying Object, anything you have never seen in your life and now you are seeing it for the first time flying can be called an UFO.

So please, try to call them Alien Vessels or Ships or Extra-terrestial Warshps, or whatever other name you have for them, because UFOs can be anything.

Shattered OUT...



posted on Aug, 11 2004 @ 11:09 AM
link   
There is evidence that there was once an official project (right around the time of Grudge and Sign) to purposefully make UFO prototypes, for the exact purpose of being able to say, "Well, how can you be sre you didn't see one of these?"

Thats why the majority of these (legitimate) craft never were treated very seriously...



posted on Aug, 11 2004 @ 01:36 PM
link   
Yah, it looks vary fake, but maybe thats what they want us to think (Or maybe im insane, does that seem more plausable?)...



posted on Aug, 11 2004 @ 05:50 PM
link   
my impression (on reading the site) was that the photos weren't meant to be taken as real and that they were only displayed for illustrative purposes. That is... the author isn't pretending that they're real, he just posted them to give the reader an idea of what these things would have looked like.

Anyways... it's interesting, but since there's no evidence besides one man's statements... there's no real case there.



posted on Aug, 11 2004 @ 06:02 PM
link   
just looking at the pics u can tell its computer animated



posted on Aug, 15 2004 @ 08:47 PM
link   
Some of the pic are fak but the others i wonder.



posted on Aug, 15 2004 @ 08:53 PM
link   
The U.S. Airforce did try to build a Saucer like craft capable of manning a couple men and carrying Nuclear Bombs during WWII, I believe.
They had the blueprints and everything.
Haven't heard of anything else about it though.



posted on Aug, 15 2004 @ 09:04 PM
link   

This thing was the fastest and slowest in it's day. Would they have left it there, or would they have been curious how the airframe would fly with jetpower?



posted on Aug, 15 2004 @ 11:08 PM
link   
good story behind it, but it looks like the ship cant fly like that. looks too wierd.



posted on Aug, 16 2004 @ 02:54 PM
link   
There were several disc shaped craft prototypes made for the USAF by various contractors. The above is just one such example. Most used propellers, a few even used jets. Lockheed has at least two such patents that I am aware of (and I've seen them posted here before), but I can't recall any prototypes being built by them. A lot of fringe companies were involved as well as the usual contractors.

This was likely based on the siezure of many such Nazi craft in development (pics of which have also appeared on this site, seach the archives)...but the idea seems to have been abandoned just as quickly as it was started.



posted on Aug, 19 2004 @ 06:15 AM
link   
This can't be fake!


JK



posted on Nov, 1 2004 @ 06:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gazrok
but the idea seems to have been abandoned just as quickly as it was started.

it was dropped due to instability because to make it stable it needs to spin. BUT due to the stress's you couldnt make 2 sections rotateing, one inner one outer. so ethier the pilot would get VERY dissy or crash at high speed.
now though it seems possible, thanks to some fancy nonfriction ballbearings.



posted on Nov, 1 2004 @ 07:04 PM
link   
I just chalk it up to "penis envy" between males of the species.




new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join