It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Uncinus
So you are just trolling by posting fake videos, when you know it's an aerodynamic contrail?
Isn't trolling somewhat frowned upon?
Originally posted by bsbray11
Are you going to offer any more proof that this is a fraud or are the sarcastic jokes still your best argument?
Originally posted by Uncinus
So the guy who shot the video explaining how it was a fraud, that's not good enough for you? He even posted on ATS explaining the whole thing.
The fact that the nozzles are flap mechanism fairings?
The trail looking exactly like an aerodynamic contrail, and not actually coming from the "nozzles"?
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by firepilot
What is your opinion of the dishonest additions that "Tanker Enemy" made to that video?
You mean labeling the sprayers on the planes and all of that?
I still haven't been shown that there was anything dishonest about it at all, unless you also think someone making jokes equates to proof of something.
Are you talking about the stuff you don't think exists again?
Nice videos, OP. I S&F'd you. I found another video I thought was pretty interesting:
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by firepilot
Its like these photos are on some merry-go-round. No matter how many times they are explained to the chemtrailers, they keep reposting them over and over and over.
Originally posted by adeclerk
Oh my. You will take a website with and agendas word
but not the original creators commentary?
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by firepilot
Its like these photos are on some merry-go-round. No matter how many times they are explained to the chemtrailers, they keep reposting them over and over and over.
If you guys are so damned sure it's an intentional effort to mislead people, then why is the best piece of evidence you have, a sarcastic joke?
All I asked is on what grounds you claim it's an intentional hoax. I know you probably believe what you say but that doesn't automatically mean you've proven anything, or that you're even trying.
Originally posted by firepilot
Will Thomas to me is the granddaddy of the chemtrail hoax, and I completely believe that he entirely made up plenty of stuff. He has redone his website, and I am trying to find the fictitious story about the KC-135s that I could tell was totally made up, because from an aviation standpoint, it was full of so many complete errors.
Dickie regularly visits Air Traffic Control at the Edmonton municipal airport to watch the chemplanes making repeated passes over the city. Blessed with good friends at work in the tower, he has watched radar-identified KC-135s "on many occasions."
On Father's Day 2002, Dickie and an excited group of 12 year-olds watched two KC-135s tracked by radar as HA (High Altitude) targets flying at 34,000 and 36,000 feet - "one to the south, and one to the north of the city."
Both USAF tankers had flown south out of Alaska. As Dickie, the kids and the controllers watched, the big jets began making patterns over Edmonton - "circuits" the controllers called it. "Petro 011" and "Petro 012" were working alone in "commanded airspace" from which all other aircraft were excluded.
And they were leaving chemtrails.
"The signature is significant," one radar operator commented, referring to a trail clearly visible on the scope extending for miles behind the KC-135. In contrast, a JAL flight on the display left no contrail.
Going outside, Dickie and several controllers scanned clear blue skies. They easily located the KC-135 leaving its characteristic white-plume "signature". Visibility was outstanding. They also clearly identified the JAL airliner at a similar flight level. It left no contrail at all.
"We see these guys up here a lot," the radar techs told Dickie. "You should have seen it when they had the big summit up in Calgary. It was exciting to watch them."
Was the U.S. Air Force spraying barium to enhance radio and radar surveillance over that G-8 gathering - or for some other purpose?
There could be no doubt about what was being left in the tankers' wake. Showing up on radar as "birdie feet" triangles, the reflective plumes also showed up as "as a concentration of dots" in the radar-visible plume. Focusing on each plane with the click of cursor, "we could see different contrails," Dickie described. Some were short and quickly vanished from the 'scopes. Other trails were thick, long and lingering - not contrails at all.
Dickie regularly visits Air Traffic Control at the Edmonton municipal airport to watch the chemplanes making repeated passes over the city. Blessed with good friends at work in the tower, he has watched radar-identified KC-135s "on many occasions."
On Father's Day 2002, Dickie and an excited group of 12 year-olds watched two KC-135s tracked by radar as HA (High Altitude) targets flying at 34,000 and 36,000 feet - "one to the south, and one to the north of the city."
Both USAF tankers had flown south out of Alaska. As Dickie, the kids and the controllers watched, the big jets began making patterns over Edmonton - "circuits" the controllers called it. "Petro 011" and "Petro 012" were working alone in "commanded airspace" from which all other aircraft were excluded.
"The signature is significant," one radar operator commented, referring to a trail clearly visible on the scope extending for miles behind the KC-135. In contrast, a JAL flight on the display left no contrail. Going outside, Dickie and several controllers scanned clear blue skies. They easily located the KC-135 leaving its characteristic white-plume "signature". Visibility was outstanding. They also clearly identified the JAL airliner at a similar flight level. It left no contrail at all.
Going outside, Dickie and several controllers scanned clear blue skies. They easily located the KC-135 leaving its characteristic white-plume "signature". Visibility was outstanding. They also clearly identified the JAL airliner at a similar flight level. It left no contrail at all.
"We see these guys up here a lot," the radar techs told Dickie. "You should have seen it when they had the big summit up in Calgary. It was exciting to watch them."
There could be no doubt about what was being left in the tankers' wake. Showing up on radar as "birdie feet" triangles, the reflective plumes also showed up as "as a concentration of dots" in the radar-visible plume. Focusing on each plane with the click of cursor, "we could see different contrails," Dickie described. Some were short and quickly vanished from the 'scopes. Other trails were thick, long and lingering - not contrails at all.
Originally posted by adeclerk
I don't need to prove anything, its a contrails coming off of a refueling(?) aircraft. Maybe they have extra tanks in there for 'chemstuff', but its unlikely since there's no spray nozzels.
Originally posted by firepilot
A good parallel is when a clergy member does reprehensible acts, but the faithful still refuse to believe that person did anything wrong.
Millions were in germ war tests
Much of Britain was exposed to bacteria sprayed in secret trials
The Ministry of Defence turned large parts of the country into a giant laboratory to conduct a series of secret germ warfare tests on the public.
A government report just released provides for the first time a comprehensive official history of Britain's biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979.
Many of these tests involved releasing potentially dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms over vast swaths of the population without the public being told.
While details of some secret trials have emerged in recent years, the 60-page report reveals new information about more than 100 covert experiments.
The report reveals that military personnel were briefed to tell any 'inquisitive inquirer' the trials were part of research projects into weather and air pollution.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by adeclerk
I don't need to prove anything, its a contrails coming off of a refueling(?) aircraft. Maybe they have extra tanks in there for 'chemstuff', but its unlikely since there's no spray nozzels.
You don't have to prove anything, no, but then obviously you have no proof.
How do you know that chemtrailing planes use nozzles, btw? Can you show me a picture of what they look like, or are you just making stuff up again?
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by firepilot
A good parallel is when a clergy member does reprehensible acts, but the faithful still refuse to believe that person did anything wrong.
Kind of like when I post this article, and you'll come back scrambling to down-play it and tell me how it's not really a big deal, and still not proof of chemtrails?
Millions were in germ war tests
Much of Britain was exposed to bacteria sprayed in secret trials
The Ministry of Defence turned large parts of the country into a giant laboratory to conduct a series of secret germ warfare tests on the public.
A government report just released provides for the first time a comprehensive official history of Britain's biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979.
Many of these tests involved releasing potentially dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms over vast swaths of the population without the public being told.
While details of some secret trials have emerged in recent years, the 60-page report reveals new information about more than 100 covert experiments.
The report reveals that military personnel were briefed to tell any 'inquisitive inquirer' the trials were part of research projects into weather and air pollution.
www.guardian.co.uk...
Actions speak louder than words, so let's see who is really the religious fanatic making excuses for reprehensible behavior.
Originally posted by firepilot
He wasnt making the claim, it was the Tanker Enemy clowns that labeled the flap hinge fairings as spray nozzles.
What are you expecting him to have proof of? He did not make the video, he did not mislable anything, he isnt claiming chemtrails