It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrueLies
I don't think your post had anything to do with the topic at hand Mr.Dung...
This Kerry crap has nothing to with Badnarik, do I have to become the thread police like you do in other threads?? If so then I'll stick my nose in that brown stuff like you did...
Originally posted by donguillermo
By the way, I don't appreciate being called Mr. Dung, and being told that I stick my nose in that brown stuff. You have really become quite uncivilized in your posting lately.
Originally posted by donguillermo
I personally believe that a Purple Heart should be given for serious wounds, such as taking a bullet or losing a limb not getting scrapped by shrapnel which results in being in the infirmary for less than a few hours.
Since you are not even old enough to serve in the military, your opinion on this carries no weight whatsoever. The military decides the criteria for awarding a Purple Heart. John Kerry met those criteria.
Also Dong, I am shocked by your pure ignorance with this line
"Unless you have actually served in a combat zone, you have no business criticizing war heroes like John Kerry for their military record. "
I actually do have all the rights to say whatever I want about Kerry and his "war heroism". The 1st Admendant protects that right, just as you have the right to blast Bush.
Originally posted by donguillermo
Do you really think ATS is representative of the registered voters in this country? First of all, this is a conspiracy website. So yes, there is a large lunatic fringe posting on ATS. Second of all, there are a lot of teenage brats posting here. It wouldn't surprise me if you are one of them. The poll asked that only those old enough to vote participate, but there was no way to enforce that.
In a previous reply to you in another thread, I predicted that Badnarik would get less than 5% of the popular vote. You did not respond. Care to go on record as saying that Badnarik will get more than 5% of the vote? After the election, it will be my pleasure to pull your post out of the archive and remind you of your brilliant prediction.
Originally posted by donguillermo
Since you are not even old enough to serve in the military, your opinion on this carries no weight whatsoever. The military decides the criteria for awarding a Purple Heart. John Kerry met those criteria.
Also Dong, I am shocked by your pure ignorance with this line
"Unless you have actually served in a combat zone, you have no business criticizing war heroes like John Kerry for their military record. "
I actually do have all the rights to say whatever I want about Kerry and his "war heroism". The 1st Admendant protects that right, just as you have the right to blast Bush.
I am shocked by your pure ignorance in not understanding that "have no business" does not mean "have no right."
This is exactly the type of doublespeak that has earned you few friends here. You REALLY are turning people away from the Dem's. Or trying to, you've become a joke.
Look at what people are calling you.
I'm not expecting a response. It seems when I show up you conveniently disappear.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by donguillermo
I personally believe that a Purple Heart should be given for serious wounds, such as taking a bullet or losing a limb not getting scrapped by shrapnel which results in being in the infirmary for less than a few hours.
Since you are not even old enough to serve in the military, your opinion on this carries no weight whatsoever. The military decides the criteria for awarding a Purple Heart. John Kerry met those criteria.
Also Dong, I am shocked by your pure ignorance with this line
"Unless you have actually served in a combat zone, you have no business criticizing war heroes like John Kerry for their military record. "
I actually do have all the rights to say whatever I want about Kerry and his "war heroism". The 1st Admendant protects that right, just as you have the right to blast Bush.
If you can't see the double speak here, you should be "denied."
Stalking you? Hey, I'm just follwing the political thread and what do I see? A certain member abusing other members, making a mockery of the Democrat's position and totally disrespecting this site, it's members and the staff. Here's a few examples, seeing as you like quotes so much:
Originally posted by donguillermo
Do you really think ATS is representative of the registered voters in this country? First of all, this is a conspiracy website. So yes, there is a large lunatic fringe posting on ATS. Second of all, there are a lot of teenage brats posting here. It wouldn't surprise me if you are one of them. The poll asked that only those old enough to vote participate, but there was no way to enforce that.
In a previous reply to you in another thread, I predicted that Badnarik would get less than 5% of the popular vote. You did not respond. Care to go on record as saying that Badnarik will get more than 5% of the vote? After the election, it will be my pleasure to pull your post out of the archive and remind you of your brilliant prediction.
Hmmm, no disrespect here.
Originally posted by donguillermo
Since you are not even old enough to serve in the military, your opinion on this carries no weight whatsoever. The military decides the criteria for awarding a Purple Heart. John Kerry met those criteria.
Also Dong, I am shocked by your pure ignorance with this line
"Unless you have actually served in a combat zone, you have no business criticizing war heroes like John Kerry for their military record. "
I actually do have all the rights to say whatever I want about Kerry and his "war heroism". The 1st Admendant protects that right, just as you have the right to blast Bush.
I am shocked by your pure ignorance in not understanding that "have no business" does not mean "have no right."
Got a problem with young people? Think because they are young they can't read and think?
Ok, DG time for you to do one of two things, plead to the Mod's, "Intrepid isn't playing the game by my rules." Or to ingnore this totally and hope it will go away.
Sorry this took so long but I'm a 2 fingered typer.
[Edited on 6-8-2004 by intrepid]
Originally posted by intrepid
Ok, DG time for you to do one of two things, plead to the Mod's, "Intrepid isn't playing the game by my rules." Or to ingnore this totally and hope it will go away.
Originally posted by donguillermo
Why don't you tell us about your military medals and combat experience? Unless you have actually served in a combat zone, you have no business criticizing war heroes like John Kerry for their military record.
Originally posted by Amuk
Sooner or later the mods will tire of His/her behavior and he/she will get banned
Originally posted by cavscout
It is one thing to be against a war, it is another to call a rat a war hero.
Originally posted by 27jd
You're probably the only person on here who does have the "right" to speak on this issue.
Like I've said before, I'm no fan of Kerry as a person, but please also be fair in labeling Bush (the man who put you in front of that AK round, and that baby in whatever position he/she was in to have his/her stomach blown out, and under knowingly false pretenses, while avoiding serving in a misguided war himself) a rat as well.
On a personal note, thank you for stepping up to fight for our country, our soldiers are awesome and should never be held accountable for the decisions of corrupt leaders.
Originally posted by intrepid
OK, DG, you ready to debate? Or are you ready to sleep? 2 Choices. I see you're still on. You're credibillity is dangling.
Originally posted by cavscout
Originally posted by donguillermo
Why don't you tell us about your military medals and combat experience? Unless you have actually served in a combat zone, you have no business criticizing war heroes like John Kerry for their military record.
And if he wasn't qualified enough to call him a coward, how are you qualified enough to call him a hero?
Originally posted by Amuk
One thing is for sure he/she has managed to take this completly off topic which I am sure was the intent to begin with.
Originally posted by donguillermo
Originally posted by intrepid
OK, DG, you ready to debate? Or are you ready to sleep? 2 Choices. I see you're still on. You're credibillity is dangling.
Look, you are engaging in blatant thread stalking, harassment, and badgering. WTF is your problem? Please don't tell me what my choices are. What exactly do you want to debate?
You have made yourself look very foolish in this thread. Please continue and let's see how many more of those little red rectangles you can get in your user profile.