reply to post by Partygirl
I struggle with this label concept as well, only because of the automatic connotation that has been attached to the term.
I really don't see the problem, they teach survival in every military branch, and the best of the best are at their core "Survivalists" and we
(most of us anyway) don't think Delta Force Operators, Seals, or Rangers are nutters, so I don't really get it.
On the most basic level, every organism on earth wants to survive, from the tiniest single cell to the most majestic redwood. So in that sense we are
all "survivalists."
It doesn't get more clear than that, we all have a built in survival instinct, those of us that are "realists" or are more in touch with
nature (campers, hunters, outdoorsmen/women) take it as a matter of fact, second nature if you will.
If anyone's "crazy" when it comes to the subject, it's the "deniers", those that deny anything or everything could happen, or that Uncle Sam is
gonna save 'em, when
clearly history proves that thought process
wrong.
This is where some of it comes from though, because on the opposite side of the spectrum you have the "doomers" who have clearly swam way too long
in the "Paranoia Pool". (i.e. "Comet Elenin is gonna kill us all!", "It's the Rapture!", "The Mayans Said...")
Is it crazy to consider all possibilities and be prepared, or as prepared as possible, for them? I don't think so, sounds prudent to me.
The thing that
really scares me, is that the "deniers", by their very nature, are not prepared, they don't see the point, and as a result
they will be the victims and/or the victimizers. They will be the gangs of looters that one could/should envision and consider, the reason some of us
have small arsenals to fend that scenario off with (among other reasons, of course
Opsec)
EVERY single one of the previous posts are completely spot on, including
Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by Partygirl
And nope, don't like the burqa. Your letting others dictate.