It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amadeo
Originally posted by NewWorldDisorder
Originally posted by Amadeo
Originally posted by NewWorldDisorder
Originally posted by ELahrairah
To believe it is a choice is insane.
Who would choose to face ridicule and violence?
If it was a choice then people would choose to be heterosexual
so they would not have to continually be attacked.
The idea that it is a choice sounds like recycled religious propaganda.
You would fit in well here. Aside from San Fran-Sicko (kudos Savage), Seattle is the gay capital of the West Coast. I don't advocate violence against gays, if you want to be gay be gay. Push it on me and that's a whole different story. Also, it may not be "choice" but it's choice. Society is pumping out more gay babies than ever before... Hmm..
Why could that be?
Care to cite your sources? More people on the planet = a higher likelihood of gay people in general. It's pretty easy to work out.
My source is common sense. Gays = Zero reproduction. Gays males = Higher chance of AIDS.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if I ran the government and wanted to cut down on population while producing a breed of femmie men who wouldn't fight back, would I do it? Hell yes I would!
So, your common sense = 'ummm I just made it up'
RIGHTO
Do you seriously think we're all a bunch of nancies who won't fight back? Tell you what, go to a drag bar and put your views across to a few queens and see how long you remain on your feet.
One of the biggest misconceptions about gay people (gay men specifically) is that we're a bunch of limp-wristed fairies who spend our time thipping cocktailth in nightclubs while dancing around with our tops off and that we'd run a mile from any sort of confrontation. Sorry to burst your bubble big boy, but it takes GUTS to come out, even in this day and age. Could YOU do it? Seriously, could you? Somehow I doubt it. In your posts you come across as someone who is terrified of gays even though we've done nothing to you (in my very limited knowledge, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong about that). Any gay man or woman who is out, has family and friends who know, and isn't ashamed for them to know, has balls the size of watermelons and deserves some respect for that alone.
Originally posted by TheLastStand
Oh I give up these mental midgets should go to the teletubbies website forum to talk with people on their own intellectual level. Talk like that to my face in person and you will no longer have any teeth left.
Originally posted by Doctor Dali Deth
In my opinion, homosexuality is a genetic defect. Note the similarities in the faces of lesbians: hook noses, bug eyes. Or how about the preponderance of gay male faces with quasi-feminine features? Choice or not, I believe homosexuality is akin to mental retardation, only gays are far more protected by the left wing media.edit on 3-6-2011 by Doctor Dali Deth because: needed to clarify my position.
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
Originally posted by Doctor Dali Deth
In my opinion, homosexuality is a genetic defect. Note the similarities in the faces of lesbians: hook noses, bug eyes. Or how about the preponderance of gay male faces with quasi-feminine features? Choice or not, I believe homosexuality is akin to mental retardation, only gays are far more protected by the left wing media.edit on 3-6-2011 by Doctor Dali Deth because: needed to clarify my position.
Hold on... I'm not pro-homosexuality BUT...
I personally know 2 very very damn hot lesbians... which in fact makes me cry in a corner to be honest.
Originally posted by Doctor Dali Deth
In my opinion, homosexuality is a genetic defect. Note the similarities in the faces of lesbians: hook noses, bug eyes. Or how about the preponderance of gay male faces with quasi-feminine features? Choice or not, I believe homosexuality is akin to mental retardation, only gays are far more protected by the left wing media.
Originally posted by TheLastStand
The op has a very sick world view and I'm surprised these assholes pointing out that the bible says this and the bible says that to us.
Originally posted by TheLastStand
Why do these religious nuts keep bringing the subject up so much if they don't like it? I bet the op is a closet fag!
Originally posted by TheLastStand
It is harmful, but only because of people like the guy who you are responding to and because of people like the op of this thread. That is how it harms people. Yeah it does cost us things but we refuse to let a handful of bigots dictate how we lead our lives. Save yourself, leave the rest of us alone.
Originally posted by PURPLEMAN
Overall, I think men should act more like men and women should act more like women and everyone in general should put more clothes on and think about sex a lot less, my self included.
Originally posted by 547000
Just because you do not consciously choose a trait of yours doesn't imply you were born that way. Experiences in your life influence you. Unless you think pedophiles are born that way or masochists are born that way.
Originally posted by smartbuddy
reply to post by virraszto
Yes it is a sin. No-one is born gay. Being gay is a choice.
The Bible is very clear on this matter both in the Old and New Testament.
When Adam and Eve brought sin into the world everyone has urges that is sinful, that is why if you have a relationship with Jesus Christ, He can help you overcome your sinful urges.
God loves all sinners and wants to save sinners from themselves but its your choice.
Questioner: We have what seems to be an increasing number of entities incarnate here now who have what is called a homosexual orientation. Could you explain and expand upon that concept?
Ra: I am Ra. Entities of this condition experience a great deal of distortion due to the fact that they have experienced many incarnations as biological male and as biological female. This would not suggest what you call homosexuality in an active phase were it not for the difficult vibratory condition of your planetary sphere. There is what you may call great aura infringement among your crowded urban areas in your more populous countries, as you call portions of your planetary surface. Under these conditions the confusions will occur.
Questioner: Why does density of population create these confusions?
Ra: I am Ra. The bisexual reproductive urge has as its goal, not only the simple reproductive function, but more especially the desire to serve others being awakened by this activity. In an over-crowded situation where each mind/body/spirit complex is under constant bombardment from other-selves it is understandable that those who are especially sensitive would not feel the desire to be of service to otherselves. This would also increase the probability of a lack of desire or a blockage of the red ray reproductive energy. In an uncrowded atmosphere this same entity would, through the stimulus of feeling the solitude about it, then have much more desire to seek out someone to whom it may be of service thus regularizing the sexual reproductive function.
Questioner: Roughly how many previous incarnations would a male entity in this incarnation have had to have had in the past as a female to have a highly homosexual orientation in this incarnation?
Ra: I am Ra. If an entity has had roughly 65% of its incarnations in the sexual/biological body complex, the opposite polarity to its present body complex, this entity is vulnerable to infringement of your urban areas and may perhaps become of what you call an homosexual nature. It is to be noted at this juncture that although it is much more difficult, it is possible in this type of association for an entity to be of great service to another in fidelity and sincere green ray love of a nonsexual nature thus adjusting or lessening the distortions of its sexual impairment.
Questioner: Is there an imprint occurring on the DNA coding of an entity so that sexual biases are imprinted due to early sexual experiences?
Ra: I am Ra. This is partially correct. Due to the nature of solitary sexual experiences, it is in most cases unlikely that what you call masturbation has an imprinting effect upon later experiences. This is similarly true with some of the encounters which might be seen as homosexual among those of this age group. These are often, instead, innocent exercises in curiosity. However, it is quite accurate that the first experience in which the mind/body/spirit complex is intensely involved will indeed imprint upon the entity for that life experience a set of preferences.
Originally posted by NewWorldDisorder
My source is common sense. Gays = Zero reproduction. Gays males = Higher chance of AIDS.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if I ran the government and wanted to cut down on population while producing a breed of femmie men who wouldn't fight back, would I do it? Hell yes I would!
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Doctor Dali Deth
In my opinion, homosexuality is a genetic defect. Note the similarities in the faces of lesbians: hook noses, bug eyes. Or how about the preponderance of gay male faces with quasi-feminine features? Choice or not, I believe homosexuality is akin to mental retardation, only gays are far more protected by the left wing media.
Been watching too much TV? Media targeting stereotypes?
Those of the LGBT orientation - - - are as diverse as all humans. They have one thing in common - - attraction to same gender.
Just because a man has feminine qualities it makes him retarded? Hell - it doesn't even make him gay.
You really need to broaden your horizons. Get off your church pew and visit the real world once in a while.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by 547000
Just because you do not consciously choose a trait of yours doesn't imply you were born that way. Experiences in your life influence you. Unless you think pedophiles are born that way or masochists are born that way.
New science of brain scan technology - - indicates that Yes - - you may be as you are born.
Meaning yes - - pedophiles and masochists might be born with those inclinations.
Of course it is still in its infancy.
Originally posted by ELahrairah
To believe it is a choice is insane.
Who would choose to face ridicule and violence?
If it was a choice then people would choose to be heterosexual
so they would not have to continually be attacked.
The idea that it is a choice sounds like recycled religious propaganda.
Originally posted by 547000
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by 547000
Just because you do not consciously choose a trait of yours doesn't imply you were born that way. Experiences in your life influence you. Unless you think pedophiles are born that way or masochists are born that way.
New science of brain scan technology - - indicates that Yes - - you may be as you are born.
Meaning yes - - pedophiles and masochists might be born with those inclinations.
Of course it is still in its infancy.
Have they isolated cases where it may not be "correlation but not causation"? This is a topic so politicized that it must be asked. Then you have bisexuals who can be attracted to both genders.
yet we have pedophiles. if its not a choice, then shouldn't they be free to practice their "alternate sexual tastes"
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Bob Sholtz
yet we have pedophiles. if its not a choice, then shouldn't they be free to practice their "alternate sexual tastes"
No, why? I dont think being a pedophile, zoophile, or any other attraction is a choice. But that does not mean that such practices have to be allowed when they harm others. We do not allow psychopaths to kill other people just because being a psychopath is not a choice, too. Homosexuals do not harm anyone, just like heterosexuals.