Proof: Station on MARS, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 266 times


reply posted on 2-6-2011 @ 01:14 AM by WordPlayJAy
reply to post by Phage



I'm confused as to what your pics have to do with the Nasa link that was posted ?



reply posted on 2-6-2011 @ 01:16 AM by Phage
reply to post by WordPlayJAy


It shows that the image catches the underside of the solar panels on the rover.


reply posted on 2-6-2011 @ 01:25 AM by fooks
Originally posted by Helious
reply to
post by 88cavs



That is an incredibly ignorant statement, more so in the face of this find. Yes, the video is blurry but you can see very clearly a formation impossible to nature.

Barring some digital imaging expert debunking this with a fantastic explanation this is pretty damn close to "proof". To claim this is being made up is just ignorant.


it's as fantastic as the bunk!! why not?

if i was gonna hide something, i will make you not believe your eyes.

this is not the pedofile stuff to see faces.

no faces here.

we need another photo other than google.


reply posted on 2-6-2011 @ 01:27 AM by LightAssassin
Originally posted by Phage
reply to
post by WordPlayJAy


It shows that the image catches the underside of the solar panels on the rover.


My picture DOES NOT show what you are suggesting. You can even see where there is lights on the structures.

Actually, PHAGE IS RIGHT.

My photo Debunked...cheers mate.
edit on 2-6-2011 by LightAssassin because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 2-6-2011 @ 01:27 AM by Alkolyk
reply to post by rstregooski



And you think nature doesn't make straight lines?

Back to OP, cool find, hard to even argue about it because in theory it "could" be a natural formation.

Although it's definitly worth looking into.


reply posted on 2-6-2011 @ 01:28 AM by Gorman91
reply to post by smartbuddy



It's the same distortions in google earth. This really isn't proof of anything. it's literally some 30 pixels.


reply posted on 2-6-2011 @ 02:12 AM by flyingkiwi
reply to post by smartbuddy



and what are those rings to the southeast? are they craters filled up with the outline left? weird.
edit on 2/6/11 by flyingkiwi because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 2-6-2011 @ 02:13 AM by Tahnya86
reply to post by Lighterside



I saerch the coards 71 49'19.73"N 29 33'06.53"W on google earth planet view and its there too, so theres proof it aint a pixel problem, if anyone has microsoft telescope have a look on there, i couldnt get mars to load.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did NASA "bomb" the moon to hide something?
  Posted 3 days ago with 76 member flags
New Plasma Battery Technology Probably Powering Stealth Sattelites
  Posted 16 days ago with 17 member flags
Nick Pope Interview on ATSLive, Got a Question to ask?
  Posted 19 days ago with 13 member flags
Will Planet X be visible during the eclipse on May 20th?
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama and the Card Game Illuminati
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags