Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
It is a term you used - do you want to change your story
I'm not changing my story, I'm reacting/responding to your constant weaseling.
And I didn't claim that it was a legitimate (rigorously proven) science.
And I didn't say that you did - perhaps you should go read what you wrote.
Right, first you say you aren't challenging what I said then you tell me
to read my own posts about it.
You claimed, and I quote:
You're telling me someone proved a negative somewhere (that the idea of orgone isn't legitimate) and it missed my attention?
And I said yes - it has proved that it isn't legitmate.
If you want to split hairs, I said the idea of orgone, not the science of orgone. Have you refuted the idea of orgone or not?
Once again, not being proven, is different than being positively refuted.[
And if you were as clever as you think you are you would have noticed that I didn't actually say anything at all about it being refuted.
That's not what it looks like to me. You are constantly playing words games to make it seem as though you have refuted something which you really
Now come on - I've already asked you to up the ante on your trolling - it's really geting rather too obvious....good trolling should be quite
a lote more suble.
The only trolling is going on on your end.
You can't prove a negative and you're pissed about it.