It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by boncho
Johnb has a logical argument. If there are any free energy devices, show them. The burden of proof lay on the people who say they exist. Show that they exist, or admit they don't.
Originally posted by john_bmth
And what would talking to the "inventors" prove? Nothing. Talk is cheap, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, not cheap talk on the Internet.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Originally posted by john_bmth
And what would talking to the "inventors" prove? Nothing. Talk is cheap, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, not cheap talk on the Internet.
Right, we can't just take the inventors' word for it...
So, in order to prove "free energy" to ourselves...
We would have to organize our own experiment!
Now do you see, john_b?
Originally posted by anumohi
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Originally posted by john_bmth
And what would talking to the "inventors" prove? Nothing. Talk is cheap, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, not cheap talk on the Internet.
Right, we can't just take the inventors' word for it...
So, in order to prove "free energy" to ourselves...
We would have to organize our own experiment!
Now do you see, john_b?
Thats right john_b before discounting the possibility do your own "PERSONAL" experimentation and not rely on anyone elses opinion, if you're cleaver enough you might find a solution and reward
To prove it, we would have to talk to other people OUTSIDE of ATS.
Originally posted by john_bmth
Like I said to cupofcoffee, why should I experiment with something I believe to be fraudulent and a waste of time? The burden of proof doesn't lie at my feet, it lies with those who make and support such claims.
Originally posted by john_bmth
Originally posted by anumohi
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Originally posted by john_bmth
And what would talking to the "inventors" prove? Nothing. Talk is cheap, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, not cheap talk on the Internet.
Right, we can't just take the inventors' word for it...
So, in order to prove "free energy" to ourselves...
We would have to organize our own experiment!
Now do you see, john_b?
Thats right john_b before discounting the possibility do your own "PERSONAL" experimentation and not rely on anyone elses opinion, if you're cleaver enough you might find a solution and reward
Like I said to cupofcoffee, why should I experiment with something I believe to be fraudulent and a waste of time? The burden of proof doesn't lie at my feet, it lies with those who make and support such claims.edit on 14-8-2011 by john_bmth because: (no reason given)
My ONLY choice, If I want to succeed, is to try to come up with a Plan.
The only Plan I can elaborate to you that has even the slightest chance of actual success, is to organize a test of the only existing open-source kit, offered by the most reputable inventors.
fraudulent??? to the fact that magnets carry their own power source that can be harnessed???
I think you better quit worrying about what others claim and do your own research before making such ignorant statements, the burden of proof is on you to prove otherwise
Originally posted by boncho
Basically, this thread has outed people who believe in something without evidence to back the belief.
Originally posted by john_bmth
fraudulent??? to the fact that magnets carry their own power source that can be harnessed???
No one even mentioned magnets but seeing as you asked... Yes, anyone claiming that magnets can be used to produce energy perpeptually is either ignorant or fraudulent.
I think you better quit worrying about what others claim and do your own research before making such ignorant statements, the burden of proof is on you to prove otherwise
And you would be wise to read people's posts before putting words in their mouths. Hell, go nuts, you could even read the OP.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Originally posted by boncho
Basically, this thread has outed people who believe in something without evidence to back the belief.
Don't be absurd; Bedini has made more evidence public than anyone.
There are lots of others who say that Bedini's technology doesn't work, or that they have something better - but are they offering an open-source kit? No......
Originally posted by john_bmth
And now we've come around full circle....
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Originally posted by boncho
Basically, this thread has outed people who believe in something without evidence to back the belief.
Don't be absurd; Bedini has made more evidence public than anyone.
There are lots of others who say that Bedini's technology doesn't work, or that they have something better - but are they offering an open-source kit? No......
Renaissance Charge is engaged in Research and Development, Sales, Promotion of Technology, and Education pertaining to work of John Bedini and Nikola Tesla. We sell very unique battery chargers, motor kits that are also more than efficient battery chargers, and electronic parts related to the same technology.
John C. Bedini, Vice President for R&D of ENERGENX
Gary Bedini, Pres. & CEO, Corporate Communications of Energenx, Inc.,
*
Rick Friedrich, General Manager Renaissance Charge, LLC.
Energenx is looking forward to expanding the test market program with Renaissance Charge and making the transition into commercial sales, marketing, and distribution program.