reply to post by sonnny1
Hi sonnny1, I didn't want to be drawn into a long debate over this, however you do deserve a reply. I do have a question for you. Have you ever had
the opportunity to be involved with child support and or the family courts?
23 kids????? So you don't mind "paying" for his children,that HE cant pay for. And he should not be punished in ANY way,for his failures as a
father,and for his thumbing his nose at the very people who are paying for his MANY children.....
The fact is, the tax payer is most likely paying for the children regardless of where the father is. Punishment is subjective, I have met many
failures as parents in many differing degrees, some people should not be allowed bread in the first instance, but this is not for me to impose. Do you
want to punish him because he is a failure as a father or because he is not paying child support, please clarify this for me as they are distinctly
two different items.
To say he is thumbing his nose at the tax payer, makes me feel that you take this personally, to feel personal about something is a great quality,
however your energy could be better placed, sorting out the corruption that exists in your Government and Corporate sectors, then there would be
billions to pay for his children and some, a bit off topic. By the end of the day the off spring may contribute to society in some amazing way, or may
not. Society should invest in its young and human resources just because it can regardless. It is not a financial thing if it was, countries wouldn't
be wasting money "Trillions" on silly things like war. Should the Doctor that created the litter of kids in that IVF woman, also paying child support
or is that one ok, because he was a Doctor, even though he acted outside the law in doing this. The tax payer, I am sure is now paying for his
selfishness, should he also join your jail queue?
OK. You rant on "government funding rape factory's",but offer NO solution to a man that gives ANY and ALL fathers,heck ALL parents a bad name. Not to
mention,and more importantly the children ! At least I offered a solution,and if there are those who deserve to be in one,then I am all for throwing
his butt in jail. He deserves something for his irresponsibility . Why dont you PICK some form of justice,for his injustice to his children....waiting
to hear what you think should be done........
To rant on, as you say. Brief definition "rant and rave shout and complain angrily and at length" I do not believe that I did this in any fashion, is
this how you attempt to control people who share a different view to you. Any way No I did not offer a solution however I did choose to present that
further expense in placing the man in a prison, where he could be possibly brutalised and or raped is not a great alternative. And no a person would
have to be rather narrow minded to think that all fathers / parents are tared with the same brush as this nonpaying fellow.
To cite injustice to his children is not entirely correct either, he may be a none payer, however he may have fantastic relations with his children or
some of his children, on the same hand, they may also be better off not knowing him, I do not know. However in the event that he has good relations
with his children, putting him in jail could potentially be a further real injustice to his children, is it good for children to have parents in jail,
I do not think so, I figure most child case workers would agree with this. Most children just love their parents regardless if they can pay their
bills or not.
My costs on this for you
Father not in Jail
Children + Mothers = Tax dollars
Father in Jail
Children + Mothers + Lawyers + Prison System = Greater Tax dollars
I get the idea that Father in jail will cost the Tax payer more than father out of jail, I may be wrong.
Solutions, I have many but who cares to be honest. My solutions would not make money for the masters and the peasant's want justice, burn the witch,
was not that the old chant, as the master of the day lit the fire.
edit on 5-7-2011 by marsend because: typo