posted on Jun, 30 2011 @ 12:02 AM
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by sonnny1
So if 84-85% of mothers are single parents and 80% of them are working.....those figures are pretty close to what I assumed alot earlier in this
thread. That tells me these mothers ARE doing their part to put bread on the table and a roof over her and her children's head. Kind of a real slap
in the face for you Sonny boy by claiming single mothers are crack heads, no good for nothing harlots, who sit on their butts getting rich on child
Fact is, when a custodial parent works and takes care of her children, her job never ends. She goes home, cook the family meals, do the washing &
household duties, assists with school homework, then prepares for the following day before her head hits the pillow. She's well organised and runs
her household like clockwork in order for her to continue working because she knows child support is not going to pay the bills let alone cover all
the costs for daycare. She does all this until her children reach 18 or completes high school.
Now tell us one day in the life of a non-custodial parent.........
So,again.......WHY is the Gender bias court system giving MOTHERS the children? I just proved that mothers are AWARDED the children 84 percent of the
time!!!!! By default,not because a FATHER could not raise them. BECAUSE,the system is archaic,in thinking mothers give something special to
children,and fathers are only good for one thing!!!! Thats the WHOLE premise of this thread!!!!!
Heres a great article written by a women who gets it!!!!!!!
Is it because our lawmakers don't believe that two adults can come to an agreement on what's right for their children? Or, is it because if the
parents make and adhere to their own agreement, the state will realize no profit from the child support collection units via the federal government's
support collections incentives?
I don't know if every state has this same statute, but I do know that every state does have equal protection clauses for all and these clauses are
being ignored by the CS laws of every single state in this nation.
Our constitution presumes all of us innocent until proven guilty, but the CS laws presume NCPs to be guilty with no chance to prove their innocence.
Is not this presumption contrary to our constitution?
CS awards are automatically garnisheed, rather than giving the parent the opportunity to fulfill his or her obligation with responsibility and
dignity. Instead, their wages are immediately attached and they are threatened with losses of drivers licenses, professional licenses and tax returns
for non-compliance, regardless of the reason for the non-compliance.
It is in the best interests of the children to protect the constitutional rights of their parents. BOTH their parents. Equality is in the best
interests of the children, not gender bias, not making the NCP a blank check and nothing more.
The current child support laws are in direct conflict with our constitution's equal protection clauses and this MUST be rectified. We cannot go on
allowing the constitutional rights of any citizen, much less millions of them, to be violated by our own government!
Child Support Reform
Too bad radical feminists dont..................