It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by XPLodER
It's easy to get confused when talking about something (space time) which is, in a way, nothing.
Mass bends space time. Let's look at the classic 2 dimensional representation. Now try to imagine that classic "dent" in space time as gravity really works, extending equally in all directions (I know, ouch, my brain hurts).
Originally posted by TMJ1972
reply to post by XPLodER
[quote]as always its an interesting post so far
but there is an issue with it
As you already stated there are about 0.015 atoms per m³ in a specific environment where there are 0.5 or whatever in some other place in space.
whatever it is, but how can you conclude that the laws of hydrodynamics can be applied to that.
allowing you to refer to 'viscosity'
HEY in best case you have a gas
IF one can already call that a gas.
because most people go along with thr term VACUUM if they talk about space.
Now having a deeper look into the matter i feel like you like to discuss viscosity along with the gravity which can be observed throughout the whole environment.
if you ask me: difficult and more or less fruitless
as far as i understood this: space as 3D environment as we experience it is BENT by gravity in a way which modifies time a little.
Now one of the predictions about einsteins formulars says, we should expect to find time somewhat dragged a little the more it comes in the vincinity of a (rotating) mass.
The effect should have been tiny, and in fact those people operating Gravity Probe B had a hard time getting into the results due to some glitches along with the gyros of that spacecraft.
excuse me but viscosity .. is just ... hmm ... wrong here
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by ziggy1706
There was an experiment done by Douglas Torr, I believe, back in the early 2000's. He was supposed to release the data, and never did (stealing, basically, the information from the people paying for the experiment). But it was taking some data anomoly measurements during an eclipse.
I came across it while digging into Ning Li. Would make a great thread of its own, if someone cares to do it.
ETA: I was wrong. It was David Noevers, when he was trying to confirm the Allais effect:
www.allais.info...edit on 3-6-2011 by bigfatfurrytexan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by ziggy1706
There was an experiment done by Douglas Torr, I believe, back in the early 2000's. He was supposed to release the data, and never did (stealing, basically, the information from the people paying for the experiment). But it was taking some data anomoly measurements during an eclipse.
I came across it while digging into Ning Li. Would make a great thread of its own, if someone cares to do it.
ETA: I was wrong. It was David Noevers, when he was trying to confirm the Allais effect:
www.allais.info...edit on 3-6-2011 by bigfatfurrytexan because: (no reason given)
Total eclipses of the Sun by the Moon reach maximum eclipse about 40 seconds before the Sun and Moon's gravitational forces align. If gravity is a propagating force, this 3-body (Sun-Moon-Earth) test implies that gravity propagates at least 20 times faster than light.
The Earth accelerates toward a point 20 arc seconds in front of the visible Sun, where the Sun will appear to be in 8.3 minutes. Thus, the acceleration now is toward the true, instantaneous direction of the Sun now, and is not parallel to the direction of the arriving solar photons now.
When Allais won the Nobel in 1988 at age 77 he had all but given up hope of acknowledgement, but as a commentary on his prize remarked at the time: "It was not till now that we discovered his greatness. Allais has been studied by us for many years and we are now certain he is a giant."
Demonstration of Foucault effect; Kremsm端nster Observatory, Austria, August 11, 1999. Rotation is shown at the maximum in pendulum (shown as round shadow with smaller laser target; back and forth swing motion not shown). The marks shown radiating beneath the pendulum itself are hourly tick marks for ideal pendulum behavior. This particular set of images shows the approximately doubling of the forward rotation (30 minutes per tick mark). Universal time is shown at lower right. The thirty-minute image separation demonstrates that the floor is moving underneath the pendulum which always keeps its initial swing direction while the earth rotates. At this latitude, the rotation from right to left in the image is approximately 11.2 degrees per hour.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by ziggy1706
There was an experiment done by Douglas Torr, I believe, back in the early 2000's. He was supposed to release the data, and never did (stealing, basically, the information from the people paying for the experiment). But it was taking some data anomoly measurements during an eclipse.
I came across it while digging into Ning Li. Would make a great thread of its own, if someone cares to do it.
ETA: I was wrong. It was David Noevers, when he was trying to confirm the Allais effect:
www.allais.info...edit on 3-6-2011 by bigfatfurrytexan because: (no reason given)