It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFOs Observing Tornado Destroy Truck In Oklahoma 2011

page: 2
15
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 31 2011 @ 08:18 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



Mod Note (This Appears On Every Post Reply Page): AboveTopSecret.com takes pride in making every post count. Please do not create minimal posts or simple "I agree" posts when replying to threads. If you need to quote a member's post in your reply, please ensure you edit down the quoted amount to the minimum needed to make your point. Overly large quotes or minimal replies are subject to warnings or deletion. Below the reply button it says: (Minimal posts that contribute nothing to the thread are subject to immediate removal.)
edit on May 31st 2011 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 31 2011 @ 08:18 AM
link   
Man, you guys have a problem with the english language. These are UFOs because they are not identified. I'll bet they are debris. Flying saucers observe, UFOs cannot.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 08:19 AM
link   
There appears to be a hill in the background, the first impression I had when I saw this were that they were helicopters but then I thought cars perhaps on a road circling a small mountain/hill in the background of the picture... the sun is obviously causing some of the debris to glint brightly and so it would stand to reason cars on a hill in the background would also glint..

Just my two cents.. I don't feel like they are alien craft of any sort, and certainly not debris .. I just suspect cars in the distance reflecting sunlight on the glass/metal

This tornado appears to be not that large .. I'm not sure I can buy the idea that the aliens would be remotely interested in this thing anyway .. not when there's been a rash of other much more larger scale storms

edit on 31-5-2011 by miniatus because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 08:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kaiuk
reply to post by RUSSO
 


I am pointing out the fact that observers often report cigars, saucers, ect but these things are never captured on video. TheONLY thing you ever see on videos are dots of light that could quite frankly be anything. Furthermore, if they were drones why would Aliens with all of their advanced technology need eight or ten individual drones. Surely, if our army can share video feeds from a drone, aliens can too. What would the motive be of these aliens? why do they care for the destruction of a truck? i dont see them landing on the whitehouse lawn very often.



I think you are getting a little carried away here , my friend . The term UFO is exactly that , Unidentified Flying Object.
Who mentioned Aliens ?
The lights ARE unidentified and the title of the OP clearly states "UFOs Observing Tornado Destroy Truck In Oklahoma 2011".

Peace



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 08:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kaiuk
The "UFOS" are perfectly square, and far blurrier than the surrounding video. I call hoax


I'm not the guy who usually says this, but this time... Clearly lense reflections...

And to the guy above me, If the UFO is "Observing" that implies sentient life, which jumps to the conclussion of Alien/Human flown UFO.

Not the case at all here, IMO.
edit on 31-5-2011 by Laokin because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 08:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by Laokin

Originally posted by Kaiuk
The "UFOS" are perfectly square, and far blurrier than the surrounding video. I call hoax


I'm not the guy who usually says this, but this time... Clearly lense reflections...

And to the guy above me, If the UFO is "Observing" that implies sentient life, which jumps to the conclussion of Alien/Human flown UFO.

Not the case at all here, IMO.
edit on 31-5-2011 by Laokin because: (no reason given)


I'm a semi-pro photogapher and I would like to see some evidence you have to back up your statement .

Too many people on ATS nowadays , chuck in one line remarks without any facts to back them up and it is becomming rarther tiresome.
Either back up your statement or run off to troll another thread.

 

ALL MEMBERS: We expect civility and decorum within all topics
edit on May 31st 2011 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 08:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by Laokin

Originally posted by Kaiuk
The "UFOS" are perfectly square, and far blurrier than the surrounding video. I call hoax


I'm not the guy who usually says this, but this time... Clearly lense reflections...

And to the guy above me, If the UFO is "Observing" that implies sentient life, which jumps to the conclussion of Alien/Human flown UFO.

Not the case at all here, IMO.
edit on 31-5-2011 by Laokin because: (no reason given)


Well clearly you are wrong. But as I said in the opening post, thats ok. I'm here in this community long enough to know about some folks behavior and explanations. Believe in what you want to believe.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 08:42 AM
link   
This has already been discussed here. Why do we need another thread on the same topic and video? It isn't any clearer than the other video either.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 08:51 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:01 AM
link   
Isn't the whole purpose of posting, discussing and investigating Unidentified Flying Objects so that they CAN be identified, yet every attempt to do so by responders gets shot down? Please explain



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:03 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:27 AM
link   
reply to post by webpirate
 


Having watched the vid again , I noticed that none of the lights pass between the camera and the Tornado, so in this instance , I have to humbly concur with your findings .

Peace


edit on 29/05/2011 by tpg65 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:46 AM
link   
It's the best 'UFO' video I've seen in a long, long time with that truck getting destroyed. Pretty scary stuff.

I've found a few more versions of the footage and they are all too low-res to be conclusive.

Some of the 'ufos' move with the landscape and are probably reflective objects on the ground that appear brighter due to the compression process of uploading to YT. One or two appear to be airborne and in motion; these are probably airborne debris.

What confirms these ideas (others have suggested them too in the thread), is that the news stations would have had higher-quality footage. They would have the original digital. In none of the broadcasts do any presenters gasp or point out the 'ufos' 'observing' the truck or tornado. This is highly suggestive of the 'ufos' being mundane and explained as above and by other members.











posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:47 AM
link   
UFO- unidentified flying object. in other words, anything in the sky you cant recognize
Because the OP originally stated UFOs observing tornado, he has clearly automatically assumed that the objects are sentient or controlled by sentient life. I.e. they are some sort of terrestrial or extra-terrestrial craft the likes of which have never been seen before. It would be a logical farce to assume that during a tornado, there wouldnt be bits of reflective junk floating about and my argument still stands that there is no way that these objects are in any way observing, following or are in any way sentient or controlled by sentient life



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:49 AM
link   
reply to post by RUSSO
 


No, those are not aliens . . .
They are portable HAARP capsules!

SeraphNB



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:49 AM
link   
reply to post by Kandinsky
 


Kand, i agree. your second video is far dimmer with far lower contrast than the OP's. Clearly, someone be it the OP or a new agency took the original footage and heightened the contrast so the truck would show up better so it would be better for television. thank you



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 10:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by tarifa37
S&F However after watching a few times I think they are cars driving along roads reflecting the light and appearing as a bright square because of the low resolution video.


How you can say these are cars on the road!
They are def not debris either. I really don't know what we are looking at here, but come on, enough with the stupid explanations



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 10:04 AM
link   
reply to post by Kandinsky
 

Those are ALL the same video. The angle. The time. It is the same piece of film. Whether enhanced or not. I have added some different angles from storm chasers of this exact event. There are NO UFO's in sight. Only debris from the funnel.

This video is of this storm, but the truck getting hit is in the last 2 mins of the video.


A different storm chaser caught this video of the same event. Just from a little further back from the other one.


I'm quite convinced after searching the Google maps and comparing it to these videos of the ground shots as well as the helicopter shots that this is the exact area where this happened. I'm also convinced, the UFO's are actually cars moving along either N. Harrison Avenue and/or N Bryan St. in the background.

Google maps of area


These are not UFO's. They are simply cars moving along other roads in the area. We like to think of Oklahoma as being flat, but if you turn on terrain mode in Google maps we can see that this is an area of rolling hills. That's why the helicopter view of these roads seems to be "above" the ground. When in actuality they are just in the background and at a slightly different elevation from the Interstate where the semi is.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 10:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jay-morris

Originally posted by tarifa37
S&F However after watching a few times I think they are cars driving along roads reflecting the light and appearing as a bright square because of the low resolution video.


How you can say these are cars on the road!
They are def not debris either. I really don't know what we are looking at here, but come on, enough with the stupid explanations


There is some explanations here that




I will never see enough here in ATS.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 10:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Kandinsky
 




What confirms these ideas (others have suggested them too in the thread), is that the news stations would have had higher-quality footage. They would have the original digital. In none of the broadcasts do any presenters gasp or point out the 'ufos' 'observing' the truck or tornado. This is highly suggestive of the 'ufos' being mundane and explained as above and by other members.


And you are sure that MSM will point a finger on it?

Maybe ball lightning feet better as an answer. But this is just a guest. Not an answer.

Ball_lightning



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join