It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Extent of Jewish Control

page: 22
125
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 04:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Unrivaled1
Posting the links to the 2 videos i tried to post earlier, unfortunately they didn't seem to work...
Regardless here are the links. They are both extremely relevant to this thread & they are working.

www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...



Thanks, Unrivaled, I just watched these. Even though I do not agree with Tony Benn politically (Benn is a Socialist -- I'm not), he has a great deal to say that's worth listening to. (Benn was born into an illustrious family, educated at Oxford and has had a very distinguished political career.)

It's interesting how Benn (once a BBC producer himself) was treated at BBC when he tried to announce an address where people could send money to Gaza for humanitarian aid. (I'm no fan of Hamas, but there are children who were/are suffering terribly there. I can already hear the objections.)

The POINT of the 1st video clip is:

the discomfort of the BBC lady who did not want Benn to announce where aid money could be sent. It's obvious that she had been instructed to block this info. Benn refused to be suppressed. And then went on to state boldly that the BBC had "capitulated to Israel" on how the news from Gaza is reported. No surprise there.

If Americans are naive enough that they're getting "fair & balanced" news in the US mainstream media, they've been asleep for years & years.

What I got from the 2nd video clip (I'm not a fan of Michael Moore) are a couple of gems from Tony Benn:

1.) The top 1% of the world's population own & control 80% of the world's wealth.

2.) TPTB have controlled the masses thru fear & despair/hopelessness. Those who are frightened & demoralized NO LONGER VOTE.

You don't have to agree with everything from the messenger, to see some merit in his message.




posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 04:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Josephus23

Originally posted by AllIsOne
reply to post by Josephus23
 


You seem to be well informed about the subject at hand. Since we are talking about "The Extent Of Jewish Control" may I ask you what your solution for the Israel/Palestine conflict would be? Is there one?


Solving the problem is no easy task and most likely will never happen....


Good post. It's hard to see this mess with Israel having a happy ending. What's really chillingly is that it may have been designed from the beginning to have a spectacularly BAD ending -- as some believe.

I'm probably being naive in hoping that's not true.



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 04:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by AllIsOne

Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by AuranVector
 


Most gentiles spout they are not anti-semitic yet their posts always spirial in to anti-semitism. Like yours!

Perhaps when you speak of Hollywood and media owned by Jews, it has nothing to do with whether they are Jews or not. A majority of Jews are not in high places, and of those who are in high places, there are alot more gentiles up there than Jews. So should we start spouting racism against the gentiles? You are targeting only a small tiny % of Jews when gentiles do ultimately run things and have alot more power than a tiny number of Jewish businessmen.



Can you clearly show me where AuranVector went "anti-semitic"?

Thanks in advance.


Thanks, AllIsOne, but there's no point in arguing with people who willfully, obstinately see only what they want to.



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 04:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by AuranVector

Originally posted by Josephus23

Originally posted by AllIsOne
reply to post by Josephus23
 


You seem to be well informed about the subject at hand. Since we are talking about "The Extent Of Jewish Control" may I ask you what your solution for the Israel/Palestine conflict would be? Is there one?

Solving the problem is no easy task and most likely will never happen....

Good post. It's hard to see this mess with Israel having a happy ending. What's really chillingly is that it may have been designed from the beginning to have a spectacularly BAD ending -- as some believe.
I'm probably being naive in hoping that's not true.


Personally i also think it was planned from the start that Israel would expand until they had all the land their "so called" God promised them..
This may have stopped with good honest leaders but that's not what they've got..



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 05:39 AM
link   
Just something interesting: My OP has already been plagiarized on another site.



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 06:07 AM
link   
reply to post by AngryOne
 


You need to add TV from Australia, disgraced DR Geoffrey Edesten ( jew), and Eddie Mcguire from channel 9 australia. Eddie is Scottish BUT he does love edesten and his dumb blonde Mrs.
Rupert Murdoch ,( jew) and part owner of channel 10 australia.
And David Lowy (jew) owner of the westfield shopping group and head of the australian world cup soccer bid.
David Lowy even has SBS TV australia and the Australian and Prime Minister in his pockets.
So yes, the Jews even own the Australian media.
edit on 2-6-2011 by meathed because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 07:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by renegadeloser
I would like to recant my previous post. While I do think that the jewish community, in general, has an us vs. them mindset, and support their own interests. I think the best way to counteract that is to ignore it, to hold no racist views, and to treat every person as an individual. Any effort to oppose jewishs interest or efforts just further entrenches them in their mindset and breeds conflict. The same goes for any group. Unless they are engaging in open conflict, then the correct response is retaliation I think.


not a bad way to think !

however, we are faced with a bigger problem aren't we ?

the big corporations are not individuals !

the corporations need the cloak of anonymity to mask their true agendas.

the corporations, like governments, have visible people called "Leaders".

the corporate controlled media portrays government "Leaders" as OUR Leaders when in fact they are the masks of the corporations themselves.

most large corporations are owned by corporations that invest in other corporations, etc. etc.

the CEO's and "officers" are appointed by the true stock holders and advisers.

this goes much higher than even the Zionist agendas .... and it has been around long before Judaism itself.

EDIT: by the way S & F


this thread is generating a good topic.

it takes guts to spar with lions.
edit on Jun-02-2011 by xuenchen because:




posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 07:18 AM
link   
reply to post by plube
 


plube has it right.

Josephus23 has made good points.



and here's some info on JP Morgan and media control:

U.S. Congressional Record February 9, 1917: J.P. Morgan interests bought 25 of America's leading newspapers, and inserted their own editors, in order to control the media. www.mindfully.org...

JP Morgan: Our next big media player? (April 13, 2010) JP Morgan controls 54 U.S. daily newspapers,and owns 31 television stations. www.newsandtech.com...


edit on Jun-02-2011 by xuenchen because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 07:27 AM
link   
reply to post by meathed
 


Mate, the first place the new Australian politician were invited to only days after the last election was Israel..

A free jaunt to get the "new kids on the block" into their pockets.



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 07:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by meathed
 


Mate, the first place the new Australian politician were invited to only days after the last election was Israel..

A free jaunt to get the "new kids on the block" into their pockets.


You gotta love our sun burnt country mate.
I wonder if this is why Rudd was removed??????
Was there more to it than coal and the taxes?????

edit on 2-6-2011 by meathed because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 07:35 AM
link   
Rupert Murdoch Jewish ??

can anyone shoot this down?

from an article no longer available - it has been 404'd

i had a partial copy for an essay.

take it with a grain of salt .. or a shot of whiskey ! ,,, your choice.



Murdoch's Jewish Roots

Murdoch “became an American citizen for business reasons,” according to Richard H. Curtiss, editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Keith Rupert was born in Melbourne, Australia, on March 11, 1931. “Rupert’s father, Sir Keith Murdoch, was a newspaper publisher, and his mother an Orthodox Jew,” Curtiss wrote, “although Murdoch never offers that information in his biographies.”

Murdoch’s father married Elisabeth Joy Greene, daughter of Rupert Greene in 1928. They had one son, Keith Rupert and three daughters. Later in life, Keith Rupert chose to use Rupert, the first name of his Jewish maternal grandfather.

The young Keith Rupert was educated at Australia’s fashionable Geelong private school, and went on to the elitist and aristocratic Oxford University in England, according to Candour (UK) magazine.

“Rupert’s father Sir Keith Murdoch attained his prominent position in Australian society through a fortuitous marriage to the daughter of a wealthy Jewish family, née Elisabeth Joy Greene. Through his wife’s connections, Keith Murdoch was subsequently promoted from reporter to chairman of the British-owned newspaper where he worked. There was enough money to buy himself a knighthood of the British realm, two newspapers in Adelaide, South Australia, and a radio station in a faraway mining town,” Candour wrote in 1984. “For some reason, Murdoch has always tried to hide the fact that his pious mother brought him up as a Jew.”

While Murdoch may have “tried to hide” his Jewish roots, he has been quite forthright about his support for extreme right-wing Zionists, such as Benjamin Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon.

Netanyahu, who wrote a book entitled The War on Terror: How the West Can Win in 1986, is a frequent commentator on Murdoch’s Fox News.

Murdoch’s support for Zionism extremists is well known and a matter of record. As New York Governor George Pataki said, “There is no newspaper in the U.S. more supportive of Israel than the [Murdoch’s] New York Post.”


edit on Jun-02-2011 by xuenchen because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 07:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen

the big corporations are not individuals !

the corporations need the cloak of anonymity to mask their true agendas.



How very true xuenchen. This is one of the biggest problems with corporations and the distribution of liability through markets.

Corporations give the appearance on the outside of being equal opportunity investments, and in a sense they are equal opportunity.
But they only afford equality if one has enough money to buy this equality.

This sounds amazingly similar to the oxymoronically name criminal justice system here in the states.

Corporations, by nature, are parasites. They are mandated by law to make the most possible profit for their shareholders despite any moral or ethical concerns.
And being that the are LLC's, or limited liability corporations with the exact same "rights" guaranteed to every United States citizen, they are viewed as one entity.
And being that they are one entity, the corporation can engage in whatever activity it wishes in order to make a profit, but not one single individual can be held liable.

The worst thing that can happen is that the corporation will be held fiscally liable.
And the result would be the shareholders losing their money.

Markets, stocks and bonds are essentially a means of distributing risk across a wide population.
This takes the risk away from the banks and places it on the people.

The monetary system in the United States is a trap.
It in no way represents the foundations of America that are found in our Constitution.

This, of course, is due in whole to the influence of the banking and merchant establishment.
They are a den of vipers, to quote Andrew Jackson.

And rather unfortunately, whether Jew or Gentile, these creatures are all most certainly Zionists.
(although the vast majority are Jewish Zionists)

Glad to see you join xuenchen.

edit on 6/2/2011 by Josephus23 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 08:09 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 



Rupert Murdoch Jewish ??
can anyone shoot this down?
from an article no longer available - it has been 404'd
i had a partial copy for an essay.
take it with a grain of salt .. or a shot of whiskey ! ,,, your choice.


No, but you don't have to be Jewish to be a Zionist..

Personally I don't believe Jews are the problem..
It's the agenda of Zionists that is..



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 08:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by xuenchen
 



Rupert Murdoch Jewish ??
can anyone shoot this down?
from an article no longer available - it has been 404'd
i had a partial copy for an essay.
take it with a grain of salt .. or a shot of whiskey ! ,,, your choice.


No, but you don't have to be Jewish to be a Zionist..

Personally I don't believe Jews are the problem..
It's the agenda of Zionists that is..


right on !

i sited Murdoch because there was a question early in this thread.

he is a big Zionist !


Murdoch the Zionist

“Murdoch is a close friend of Ariel Sharon,” Sam Kiley, The Times (UK) veteran journalist on the Middle East wrote about the man who took over the once famous British paper. Kiley said Murdoch’s friendship with the Israeli prime minister had caused senior staff at the paper to rewrite important copy.

“Murdoch’s executives were so afraid of irritating him that, when I pulled off a little scoop of tracking down and photographing the unit in the Israeli army which killed Mohammed al-Durrah, the 12-year-old boy whose death was captured on film and became the iconic image of the conflict, I was asked to file the piece ‘without mentioning the dead kid.’” Kiley wrote. “After that conversation, I was left wordless, so I quit.”

Sharon and Murdoch are old friends. On Oct. 15, 1982, a month after the massacres of thousands of Palestinian refugees in the Sabra and Shatila camps of Beirut, war crimes which occurred under Sharon’s direct command, the Israeli defense minister held meetings with Rupert Murdoch and others, reportedly in order to advance his “West Bank real estate grab.”

The visit with Sharon included a trip for Murdoch and his editors from New York and London that “took them on a bird’s-eye tour of Israel aboard a helicopter gunship, flying over the Golan Heights, West Bank and settlements.”

“I have always believed in the future of Israel and the goals of the international Jewish community,” Murdoch said at a spring fund-raiser for the Museum of Jewish Heritage - A Living Memorial to the Holocaust on April 29, 2001.

From the beginning, News Corp., his global media company, “has been supportive of the Jewish national cause,” Murdoch said.

Larry Silverstein, who had not yet acquired the lease on the World Trade Center, attended the fund-raiser with Murdoch and reportedly said about museum chairman Robert Morgenthau’s plans to expand the museum: “I’ll support you…as long as you keep it under 110 stories.”



It is through a network of Zionist organizations, in which Murdoch plays a central role, that Murdoch is connected to the individuals who arranged the privatization – and obtained control of the World Trade Center – shortly before its destruction.

These key individuals are: Larry Silverstein and the former Israeli commando Frank Lowy, the lease holders of dubious repute who gained control of the WTC property six weeks before 9/11, and Port Authority Chairman Lewis M. Eisenberg, who authorized the transfer of the leases.

Murdoch belongs to, and has been honored by, a number of leading Zionist organizations in which Silverstein, Lowy, and Eisenberg all hold senior positions. These organizations include the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), and the New York-based Museum of Jewish Heritage - A Living Memorial to the Holocaust.

Fifty days before 9/11, Silverstein Properties and Lowy’s Westfield America secured 99-year leases on the WTC. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey turned control of the World Trade Center over to the private hands of Silverstein and Lowy on July 24, 2001.

Silverstein and Lowy then took control of the 10.6 million-square-foot complex, which included the twin towers office buildings and two nine-story office buildings. Silverstein and the former Israeli commando Lowy then controlled all access to the World Trade Center.

Lowy leased the shopping concourse called the Mall at the World Trade Center, which comprised about 427,000 square feet of retail space.

“Six weeks before the WTC towers were destroyed, the Port Authority completed the process of leasing them for 99 years to Larry Silverstein, the developer who had built 7 World Trade Center [which mysteriously self-demolished at 5:25 p.m. on 9/11].

“Simultaneously, the retail space underneath the complex was leased to Westfield America, the US division of an Australian company that is one of the world’s largest operators of shopping malls.” Paul Goldberger wrote in New Yorker, May 20, 2002.

“Silverstein and Westfield were given the right to rebuild the structures if they were destroyed, and Westfield has the right to expand the retail space by 30 percent,” Goldberger wrote.

Silverstein is suing for some $7.2 billion in insurance money for the loss of the destroyed World Trade Center – and his expected earnings – for property he had leased with a down payment of $100 million – of borrowed funds.



NOTE: the quotes are from a 404'd webpage ....... www.thetruthseeker.co.uk...
(i think from 2004 or 2005)



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 10:37 AM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 11:07 AM
link   
You will only be attacked for revealing the truth.

I agree with you there is definitly something to this, no one can deny it and it's written on the walls. But no one wants to say it, and that's because everyone is like 'omg he just said jews, oh #. ' I swear its worse to accuse the jews of anything than it is to say N!gger, and that's a powerful word.

I was reading your thread and I find that as much as ATS is 'extreme' and 'on the edge' with new information, the subject of the jews, race, and anything that has to do with leaving someone out seems to be a touchy subject.
If you look at the 'RH negatives threat from extraterrestrials' thread, 98% of the 75 pages of replies are by people who are NOT RH Negative blood types and are completely scared that they might be missing something. I am RH negative and I've known that I'm only here for a temporary amount of time, I've known this my whole life.

People are scared of things they do'nt understand. And the jews and their complete stranglehold is one of them, as for the people who are going to call us racists, whatever, every creature on the planet is racist, you ever see a lion hang out with some tigers? A frog # a toad? And if your white, or whatever race calling people racists how many of the opposite (white for black etc) race have you dated? Go on a date with one and see what happens. I'm celtic, and I dated a black girl who wouldnt let me meet her parents because they 'would kill me they are so racist'. So look at yourself before you point to anyone.



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 11:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jehovah_Yahweh
We're here, we're superior.... deal with it.


Those claiming an inherent superiority would do well not to submit such an error-ridden post, unless it was intentionally done for comedic value.



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 11:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jehovah_Yahweh
We're here, we're superior.... deal with it.

Bottom line is, whatever you accuse the Jew of being/doing, you can find equally evil/bad examples in any other culture.

The hatred comes out of the fact that Jews, put them anywhere, and they are successful. Why? Because we're the God's chosen people and we are more superior in any way. Heck!! the website you are posting on now is run by a administrator Jew who allows you to speak here. You should be thankful to us that we are letting you speak.

Europe and middle-america are butthurt because the average white person is stupid, lazy and have no cohesiveness. They need someone like us to lead them and show them their place.

Also, I laugh at the trash idiots who disdain Jews for being inferior race.

And Israel is not evil. Israel's only real fault is how we have not got rid of the parasitic palestinians.
edit on 2-6-2011 by Jehovah_Yahweh because: (no reason given)


Well, at least you're in Zion, good place for you probably.

Do you think your post really helps Jews, or hurts them? You repeat the same nauseating claim, that Jews are special ("superior" is your term actually), and that the rest of the world is therefore just jealous. Doesn't that get old?

You put your cards on the table, you apparently hate white people, calling them lazy and stupid. So how can that help your credibility? Sounds just as bad as those who attack all Jews, because of bad behavior by some Jews.

But one thing you said (at least) I will agree with: White people have little cohesiveness. And in comparison to Jews, well, there is no comparison (unless you go back to Nazi Germany of course).

Let's go with your assertion for a minute, see where it leads. Jews are a very cohesive people, much more so than the rest of the disorganized mob, by all appearances.

Is this a 'good' thing, or a 'bad' thing?

It could be either, but it surely represents an Achilles Heel for Jews, who can be so easily kept in line, by their own.

You see, long before Political Correctness became so ugly throughout the Western world, there was already a shall we say "seminal" version of it quite virulent amongst Jews. If a Jew stepped out of line, BAM! Another Jew would step in and say something like, "Is that the way your mother raised you?! For shame!!"

This powerful force used to keep the flock in control was recognized quite a while ago. If such a thing wasn't there, Zionism wouldn't even be possible. But it's here, maybe we should "deal with it", as you say.

Let's take another step back. Before Hertzl. Before Rothschild even. Could there have been anyone "else" who might have taken notice of this interesting Jewish trait?

Hmmm...
edit on 2-6-2011 by JR MacBeth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 12:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by AngryOne
Just something interesting: My OP has already been plagiarized on another site.


Are you allowed to name the site here?



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 12:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen
Rupert Murdoch Jewish ??

can anyone shoot this down?

from an article no longer available - it has been 404'd....

"Keith Rupert (Murdoch) was born in Melbourne, Australia, on March 11, 1931. 'Rupert’s father, Sir Keith Murdoch, was a newspaper publisher, and his mother an Orthodox Jew,' Curtiss wrote, “although Murdoch never offers that information in his biographies.”

"Murdoch’s father married Elisabeth Joy Greene, daughter of Rupert Greene in 1928. They had one son, Keith Rupert and three daughters. Later in life, Keith Rupert chose to use Rupert, the first name of his Jewish maternal grandfather."



If that's true then Rupert Murdoch is definitely Jewish (matrilineal).

It would explain why Fox is so staunchly Pro-Zionist.

I watched part of Hannity's recent interview of Netanyahu, and I was interested in the way Hannity treated Netanyahu. Hannity wasn't exactly "fawning" -- but he did treat Netanyahu with the utmost respect -- kid gloves.




top topics



 
125
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join