It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by TexasTea
Yep, they got onto this one quickly. Isn't that ..umm, "funny", that the same ones jump on any chemtrail post as fast as possible to derail it?
"derail"??
You have it all wrong.
Dispute.
Explain.
Educate.
If a thread started on any topic, and it was obvious bunk, and had NO science to back it up --- NO proof --- but, was claimed as "true"?
Well, the only ones of that sort that are usually unassailable, are in forums such as "Religion and Creationism" or "Predictions and Prophecies".
(Or, maybe "Skunk Works", etc)
Because, unlike a science-based fact, a "chem"-trail belief is not much different from a religious belief. Has all the same indications, and behaviors, by the *faithful*....
BTW...you will notice many of the "same ones" coming here constantly, and repeating the same tired old, discredited garbage, over and over. What's worse, is MORE are making "new" accounts ("new" in quotes, since it's obvious often, that they aren't really "new" to ATS) to further spread their "religion".
It looks more and more like a concerted effort to keep the con, the scam, the hoax...the money-maker alive, best they can, by keeping the myth going.
Follow the money....you will find the culprits.
edit on Tue 31 May 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by windword
It seems to me the people with the most money have the most to hide. In this case it isn't us "chemtrailers." But hey, Who are you going to believe, debunkers or our lying eyes?
"Follow the money," really?
Originally posted by Uncinus
reply to post by wcitizen
You see what I did above though?
I made a list of all the evidence for and against. It was very compelling.
Why can't your side make a list that compelling for your argument? Why hide your evidence away?
It seems to me the people with the most money have the most to hide. In this case it isn't us "chemtrailers." But hey, Who are you going to believe, debunkers or our lying eyes?
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by windword
It seems to me the people with the most money have the most to hide. In this case it isn't us "chemtrailers." But hey, Who are you going to believe, debunkers or our lying eyes?
I don't think he's suggesting YOU are shilling for money. He's suggesting you've been duped by the likes of Alex Jones, Art Bell, William Thomas, Jeff Rense, Clifford Carnicom, and Michael J. Murphy - all of whom make (or attempt to make) money from promoting fear, including fear of chemtrails.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by HenryPatrick
You say contrail, I say chemtrail.
Well....then, guess every cloud you see, from now on, you might have to call it a "chem"-trail, too.
edit on Tue 31 May 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by windword
But hey, Who are you going to believe, debunkers or our lying eyes?
Originally posted by windword
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by windword
It seems to me the people with the most money have the most to hide. In this case it isn't us "chemtrailers." But hey, Who are you going to believe, debunkers or our lying eyes?
I don't think he's suggesting YOU are shilling for money. He's suggesting you've been duped by the likes of Alex Jones, Art Bell, William Thomas, Jeff Rense, Clifford Carnicom, and Michael J. Murphy - all of whom make (or attempt to make) money from promoting fear, including fear of chemtrails.
Fair enough. But, If they are the MSNBC of chemtrails, then these ATS debunkers are the FOX news.
Originally posted by Uncinus
reply to post by wcitizen
You see what I did above though?
I made a list of all the evidence for and against. It was very compelling.
Why can't your side make a list that compelling for your argument? Why hide your evidence away?
Originally posted by Uncinus
reply to post by wcitizen
You see what I did above though?
I made a list of all the evidence for and against. It was very compelling.
Why can't your side make a list that compelling for your argument? Why hide your evidence away?
Originally posted by HenryPatrick
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by HenryPatrick
You say contrail, I say chemtrail.
Well....then, guess every cloud you see, from now on, you might have to call it a "chem"-trail, too.
edit on Tue 31 May 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
From pretending like you have evidence to attacks on people's intelligence when they refuse to believe your same-old irrelevant nonsense. Pretty high-brow.
Everybody who denies chemtrails is a government agent, whether they know it or not.
Originally posted by GringoViejo
To attack a "chemtrail" believer's intelligence, they would have to have any intelligence in the first place.
Idiots who think contrails can't persist come to mind. Or people running around calling people government agents
edit on 31-5-2011 by GringoViejo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wcitizen
Ask the person who believes in chemtrails to provide some evidence KNOWING that you and a few others will immediately jump on it, ridicule it, deny it, etc.