It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
That's rather presumptuous of You, to state They are "ALL frauds."
I know for a fact that electrogravitics was being worked on in the 1950's and went into black ops in late 1959 or early 1960. My father, a CalTech grad and Electrical Engineer, worked for one of the leading aerospace contractors involved in electrogravitics (EG). He would come home and try to teach His toddler (Me) how EG worked and described the future EG would bring:
EG creates antigravity AND overunity. Dad described floating cars, houses and cities. He told Me of abundant energy. And then one night He came home and woke Me up to tell Me We couldn't talk about it anymore - "They want it secret for now."
That was 50+ years ago. I am sure black ops has some awesome R&D relative to EG.
If You believe ALL such work is fraud, You have bought the lie They sell Us.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by Arbitrageur
that vid [ dragons den ] was uploaded on 14th december 2008 - where is it now ?
Originally posted by Gab1159
reply to post by Shadowalker
Well it's the same thing with everything you buy. Everything breaks down, but that's part of another economic conspiracy (make fragile products so people have to buy back. In fact, a product that lasts forever isn't profitable for the companies). A car, which runs on oil (explosion engine), still has to be replaced every 10-15 years.
Yes, free-energy will never be free, but it can be a lot better than our current technologies!
Originally posted by Gab1159
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Anything an actual profit can be made of, you can be sure it wont be suppressed for long. Thats human nature. Thats why I quit believing in all this suppressed science stuff. The world is an extremely competitive place and if something comes along that is better, it will be used.
Profit can't be made out of free energy...
EDIT: Or should I say...the profits made with free-energy would be a tiny tiny fraction of the profits made with oiledit on 30-5-2011 by Gab1159 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by boncho
Yeah, because an energy source that cost next to nothing has less profit potential than an energy source that costs billions in infrastructure development, operation and maintenance....
Did you really just say that? It's not about the facts?
Originally posted by Miccey
Its not the actaul facts that are interesting...Its the INFORMATION.....
THE WHOLE PICTURE.....
Originally posted by samkent
The most likely first uses would be to replace power plants. If you look at the current state of your utility company you will find they have far fewer employees than years ago.
Gone are the rooms of people preparing your bills. Computers.
On the way out are the meter readers. Our local meters are being replaced with transmitters as I type. The local job loss will be nil.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Anything an actual profit can be made of, you can be sure it wont be suppressed for long. Thats human nature. Thats why I quit believing in all this suppressed science stuff. The world is an extremely competitive place and if something comes along that is better, it will be used.
Originally posted by Laokin
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Anything an actual profit can be made of, you can be sure it wont be suppressed for long. Thats human nature. Thats why I quit believing in all this suppressed science stuff. The world is an extremely competitive place and if something comes along that is better, it will be used.
Not if the new "better" technology is actually cheaper and virtually impossible to make money off of. You contradict yourself in your own statement.
"Anything an actual profit can be made of" mmhmm, but free energy is profitless.
See that big glaring word.... FREE?
Originally posted by john_bmth
Originally posted by Amaterasu
I know for a fact that electrogravitics was being worked on in the 1950's and went into black ops in late 1959 or early 1960. My father, a CalTech grad and Electrical Engineer, worked for one of the leading aerospace contractors involved in electrogravitics (EG). He would come home and try to teach His toddler (Me) how EG worked and described the future EG would bring:
EG creates antigravity AND overunity. Dad described floating cars, houses and cities. He told Me of abundant energy. And then one night He came home and woke Me up to tell Me We couldn't talk about it anymore - "They want it secret for now."
That was 50+ years ago. I am sure black ops has some awesome R&D relative to EG.
If You believe ALL such work is fraud, You have bought the lie They sell Us.
Again, more unsubstantiated rumour. Where's the science? Where's the evidence? So we're just supposed to take your outlandish claims posted on a conspiracy board on the internet as truth without a shred of evidence?
Like everyone else who swears blind they've achieved "over unity" with magnets and so on?
My dad told me he saw the Loch Ness monster, that doesn't make it so. In fact, google "Loch Ness monster sightings" or even "fairy sightings" and you'll have a whole list of people who sincerely believe they've seen them. That doesn't make it true.
(And, I might point out that the list of sighting does not make them FALSE, either.)
Originally posted by john_bmth
Originally posted by Gab1159
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Anything an actual profit can be made of, you can be sure it wont be suppressed for long. Thats human nature. Thats why I quit believing in all this suppressed science stuff. The world is an extremely competitive place and if something comes along that is better, it will be used.
Profit can't be made out of free energy...
The manufacturing and maintenance of said device can, let alone a whole slew of axillary industries that would crop up. To date, not one single "free energy" (over unity) device has been demonstrated objectively under controlled conditions. Not one. All you get is the usual shady characters and the same snake oil for the gullible.edit on 30-5-2011 by john_bmth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Unity_99
You think, eh. Theres been quite a few and since based on basic momentum of earth and its electro magnetic field its acually basic science.
The actual patents granted are of "working" devices.
Because they have to find more conventional form of energy since those really exotic ones (such as "energy from the vacuum" posted by Hawkiye) are suppressed.
There are several reports from military officials stating the military complex has been using free-energy in some of the most top-secret bases.
What is the purpose of investing billions of dollars in technology research when we have discovered free-energy, you ask? Good question, the answer is not easily found. We can only speculate at this one, but there must be a reason, right? Maybe they are trying to produce new forms of energy in which they could make a reasonable amount of profit? I don't know...just speculating here...but there has to be a good reason.
Anyways, if you look at the link about Victor Klimov I posted in one of my comments, you'll see that energy from the vacuum is possible, exploitable, and that we have ways of exploiting it RIGHT NOW as we speak.
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by Amaterasu
Do you have anything other to say than conjecture? No? Then you're just another voice making outlandish claims amongst the many thousands posting on conspiracy boards such as these.
(And, I might point out that the list of sighting does not make them FALSE, either.)
You're quite right, it's the lack of any objective evidence that makes them inadmissible.
Originally posted by john_bmth
Show me the peer-reviewed papers from credible journals or independent lab results from credible institutions that provide evidence of over unity. That is all I ask.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Memories and documentation are hardly "conjecture," sweetheart. So, yes. I have personal experience and documentation. What else can One have when the tech is kept tightly under wraps and One has no other access?
con·jec·ture /kənˈdʒɛktʃər/ Show Spelled [kuhn-jek-cher]
noun, verb, -tured, -tur·ing. –noun
1. the formation or expression of an opinion or theory without sufficient evidence for proof.
2. an opinion or theory so formed or expressed; guess; speculation.
3. Obsolete . the interpretation of signs or omens. –verb (used with object)
4. to conclude or suppose from grounds or evidence insufficient to ensure reliability. –verb (used without object)
5. to form conjectures.
No lack of evidence that electrogravitics was being studied in the 1950's. (Again, read Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion.) Ergo, it is admissible.edit on 5/31/2011 by Amaterasu because: tags
Electrogravitics is a failed hypothesis proposed by Thomas Townsend Brown and Brown's subsequent extensive experimentation and demonstrations of the effect. The term was in widespread use by 1956.[1] The effects of electrogravity have been searched for extensively in countless experiments since the beginning of the 20th century; to date, other than Brown's experiments and the more recent ones reported by R. L. Talley,[2] Eugene Podkletnov, and Giovanni Modanese, no conclusive evidence of electrogravitic signatures has been found. Recently, some investigation has begun in electrohydrodynamics (EHD) or sometimes electro-fluid-dynamics, a counterpart to the well-known magnetohydrodynamics, but these do not seem a priori to be related to Brown's "electrogravitics" .
I am unsure why things MUST be "peer reviewed." Since the system of peer review is biased towards a set world view, new and/or disruptive technology will NOT get positive peer review no matter how valid the work is.
Frankly, I have little faith at all in peer review.