Yeah, something seems fishy about this...


The anthrax attacks served their purpose by fanning the flames for more strigent security regulations, and "legitmized" the Wars ME countries (although this was a domestic attack...)

You may want to look into the blog by Dr. Meryl Nass. She has a collection of articles concerning this issue and her site is interesting.

I personally was disabled by the Vaccine which I was given in preparation for deployment. There was an interesting memo floating around recently (an older memo that is now released) that Ross Perot sent EDIT: ROVE in which they identified genetic connections for those of us that became ill. This whole issue from sick Veterans, to the Letters, to Ivins smells to the high heavens.

I think it could go either way. It could be totally true, and it really did take them that long to track him down, and he really did do what they said he did, etc. and it was just seized upon to fan the flames of fear in the US at the time they wanted it to........................


Or it could have been more orchestrated.

The problem is, we really dont know how often something like that happens when the media doesnt choose to blow it all up out of proportion. And I dont specifically mean how often someone uses Anthrax, but how often someone kills people using chemicals or biological material they have access to via their job or field of study, etc.

I do remember one episode of forensic files where a guy dumped mercury in a womans car vents, (sloppily, which rendered it ineffective) and another where some guy working in a research facility took a known carcinogen and poisoned a whole extended family with it on a holiday. Killing two immediately, and leaving others to wait and wonder when they would get cancer. (And one killed himself because of the stress of that)

So..............................weird crap does happen in the US, because the media is so selective in what they hype up and WHEN they hype it up to promote political agendas, its very very hard to make an intuitive call on this one. In order for intuition to work well, you usually need a lot of background in an area, and all that library of information gets processed subconsciously, resulting in light bulb moments.

But here, someone else is picking and choosing what we have in our library, and so we are at a disadvantage in trying to ascertain whether its real, or faked.