posted on Mar, 29 2003 @ 09:05 PM
Im not going to speculate on how accurate the above post is in terms of NWO theory... however, I have been looking and asking questions. I still dont
have answers, but here are the questions I am asking...
When these guys arrived, William, among others, thought they were a bunch of kids/hackers/pains (based on initial posts, can see why this would be
thought). However, William specifically asked for info related to the supposed covert dismantling of this yahoo site. Based on subsequent posts, it
appeared that William believed thier story to be true at least in that they were covertly dismantled from yahoo by unknown forces for unknown
Within a matter of hours of these posts going up on ATS, ATS goes offline (I know, I was on it when it happened).
Williams explaination was that these threads were in current use when ATS went down, which can cause some things to disappear... however, I
know for a fact these guys were offline and the threads in question were not in use for at least an hour before ATS went down.
ATS comes back up after 24 hours, most of the new guys are gone, along with thier specific threads (I was actually posting on active threads when ATS
went down, and my posts or threads didnt go anywhere). This is highly selective.
So, consider two possibilities:
Mods/Admin actively deleted these new guys and thier posts
An outside source/agency deleted them, or directed mods/admin to do so.
If Mods/Admins deleted these guys per thier own perogative, I for one would like an explaination. Yes, these guys were a little on the rowdy side, and
didnt sound all that credible... however, they didnt break any rules, and last I heard, you got at least a couple of warnings/locked threads before
you got busted and banned. Even then, you dont delete every thread your banned member was on.
If an outside source/agency deleted these guys and thier threads, I would hope that the mods/admins would have SOME clue as to who did it and
why. If so, why not come clean with it???
If the mods/admins were directed to do so by an outside agency, that would at least explain the sudden hesitance to be more straighforward with the
rest of the ATS users. But, if this is true, that raises questions such as who would be able to intimidate the mods/admins into taking such action????
Better yet, WHY???? The only answer I come up with for this one is that these guys were legitimately onto something that pissed someone off high high
If there is the intervention of an outside agency, either against the wishes of ATS admin, or directing ATS admin to take these actions, I believe it
fair and reasonable for admin to at least explain this to the rest of the ATS membership. This could well be VERY important to the rest of us, if we
are in fact the subject of an investigation, regarding something that was posted.