It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Just Now Witnesses Them Dispersing Chemtrails Over Springfield MO.

page: 5
30
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:12 PM
link   
Oh dear.
edit on 30-5-2011 by seabhac-rua because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:14 PM
link   
reply to post by anumohi
 


Okay, explain how those differ from persisting spreading contrails.



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:14 PM
link   
reply to post by anumohi
 

Here's a 1965 Outer Limits episode. What do you see at about 0:30?


Twilight Zone from 1985. (at 8:56 and 13:13).


Are these different from what is in your pictures?



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by anumohi
 


Oh, for pity's sake, TRY to educate yourself:

flightaware.com...

Ask me anything, about the site, above, that you don't understand......


oh for pitty sake try educating yourself, and quit buying into all the government lies and deception and get on board.
its your health thats at risk not theirs, they have beautiful underground cities they can live in...not you



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by seabhac-rua
I'm talking about perspective not what is correct F'ing english mate.


No, you were just being pedantic and wrong, which clouded your point.


Originally posted by seabhac-rua
The sun has no 'front', if somebody places something between you and the sun that means it is between you and the sun not in 'front' of the sun



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:20 PM
link   
Oh for crying out loud, do you chem-mies never give up with this stupidity.
Please enough already.



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Uncinus
reply to post by anumohi
 


Okay, explain how those differ from persisting spreading contrails.


I watched them turn the spigot on and then i watched them turn the spigot off, then come right back and do it again multiple times.

DID YOU HEAR ME???
I watched them turn on the spigot then run a 10 mile pass at 35,000ft then turn the spigot off and do it all over again with a giant X pattern, and you can see it spreading out on the image. the second photo has the plane in it spraying.

I DON'T THINK YOU WERE LISTENING

after they quit spraying there was no con trail behind the plane, nor the other commercial aircraft at that altitude. then when they would make another pass it would spray a trail, until it stopped to move to another position......

YOU'RE NOT LISTENING, AND YOU NEVER WILL



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:27 PM
link   
reply to post by anumohi
 



I see, rather than using the tools I offered, along with my experience and knowledge to interpret and understand them...you prefer to continue with baseless assertions, that are formed out of ignorance, and poor science comprehension?

Is this, then, to be considered a thread that is *phishing* for flags and stars?? Instead of actually trying to learn something, and blow away the veil of ignorance?



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:34 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:36 PM
link   
Today's a great day for spaying, everyone's outside enjoying their day in the sun and swimming pools. they sure picked the right day for a good dusting of the oblivious



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:38 PM
link   
reply to post by anumohi
 


Why do you refuse to look at FlightAware then?

Because......it will destroy the fantasy you have developed around "chem"-trails?

The facts, science, the reality are all clear, to everyone.

You *claimed* (repeatedly) that what you saw ere at "35,000 feet". That IS a valid cruising altitude, but......without using any flight tracking sites, how do you determine this?

Your *sighting* is bogus, and I think you are well aware of it....since, rather than learning, you attack and refuse to investigate properly.



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:42 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by anumohi
 


Why do you refuse to look at FlightAware then?

Because......it will destroy the fantasy you have developed around "chem"-trails?

The facts, science, the reality are all clear, to everyone.

You *claimed* (repeatedly) that what you saw ere at "35,000 feet". That IS a valid cruising altitude, but......without using any flight tracking sites, how do you determine this?

Your *sighting* is bogus, and I think you are well aware of it....since, rather than learning, you attack and refuse to investigate properly.



my sight is bogus??? I was a trained aircraft recognition specialist with the army ADA for 3 years. and i was watching them turn on the spigot with my 10x 50 binoculars all morning, amongst other aircraft.

YOU DON'T READ NOR LISTEN EITHER



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by ICEKOHLD
reply to post by Uncinus
 


i've never seen any science books with them in there. ...

Have you ever looked for such books ?


Originally posted by ICEKOHLD
....i don't know any scientists.

I don't know any piano builders,.... but I have seen and heard the music, from pianos.


Originally posted by ICEKOHLD
....and i do know that textbooks have been known to be manipulated by people to convey messages that they want others to see.

How do you know this ? Are you assuming it to be so ?
And if there was a rare case that "have been known to be" manipulated, is your trust in textbooks blown wide open (wide shut ?
) Do you distrust any and all textbooks ?...or do you pick and choose based on suspicion and topic ?


Originally posted by ICEKOHLD
...again...all the evidence you have is evidence that has been/can be debunked in other ways. your arguments are just as ungrounded/unprovable as mine,

Not so.
I have documented info from historical scientific textbooks, journals, and studies.
If you claim my documented info has been "faked", you need to then prove that.. By saying you have a "subjective hunch" that my info is somehow invalid, ...that reason is not good enough, by anybody's standards.
You can't just say "that must be faked, because I say it is".


Originally posted by ICEKOHLD
.....and yet you claim superiority. i'm at least claiming that i don't know and am keeping an open mind (and >>eyeseyes



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:59 PM
link   
reply to post by EyeDontKnow
 


Stop feeding your ego and get back on topic


Anyways OP you should buy a telescope that can be monitor from a computer, and record these planes as they "spray" over you, not only would you get decent detail of what's happening, but you'll have proof if you find anything strange.



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 01:59 PM
link   
reply to post by anumohi
 


Try this link it seems to be showing well nothing.

www.accuweather.com...

Sorry it shows normal weather.



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 02:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by anumohi
 


Try this link it seems to be showing well nothing.

www.accuweather.com...

Sorry it shows normal weather.


did you notice the funky brown haze within the doppler image??? I ain't never seen that before.

hey I'm glad those storm broke up, I don't want to live another Joplin nightmare...DO YOU???



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 02:07 PM
link   
reply to post by anumohi
 


You are looking at an infrared satellite image. Not doppler radar.



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 02:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Nobama
reply to post by EyeDontKnow
 


Stop feeding your ego and get back on topic


Anyways OP you should buy a telescope that can be monitor from a computer, and record these planes as they "spray" over you, not only would you get decent detail of what's happening, but you'll have proof if you find anything strange.


I was just out enjoying my morning when i looked up and started watching this big silver jet crisscrossing the sky, then i noticed it was turning on its con trail then turning it off ,and then the trail started growing wider. i watched this thing for over an hour, then realized this wasn't normal so i posted it. it wasn't like i went out to look for trails, its very rare around here, but today i got to see them in action first hand. and felt compelled to share, not get trolled by all the pseudo expert debunkers


GEEZZ



posted on May, 30 2011 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by anumohi
 


You are looking at an infrared satellite image. Not doppler radar.


radar.weather.gov...



new topics

top topics



 
30
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join