Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Honor93
Einstein's theories were highly criticized and still are but evidence was and continues to be found to support them.
I'm not sure which Murphy you're referring to.
Galileo was rejected for religious reasons not scientific. He had the evidence to back up his claims.
Aristotle did not depend on evidence and most of his "science" was wrong.
Calling a contrail a chemtrail because it lasts a long time and spreads out is not evidence.
edit on 5/31/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
edit on 5/31/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
hmmm, so according to you ... Aristotle = bad science ... well, that proves science isn't absolute ... even yours.
Galileo may have been rejected For religious reasons but it WAS HIS SCIENCE that was questioned, denied, debunked and it was his science that brought
forth his imprisonment and yet it took another how many hundreds of years for the science community to accept and exonerate him? yep, them are some
good scientific foundations right there.
ahhhh, and let's not forget Newton ... after all, his heresy nearly caused the collapse of the entire 'modern' world of their day ... forget the
fact that the science was not 'proven' at the time but has since been accepted as absolute yet not fully understood, even today.
oh yeah, and back to Einstein ... None of his Theories were proven before being presented ... they were presented as Theory and later proven ... as
chemtrails have and will continue to be.
As for Murphy ... let's go with the lesser known one ... Daniel Murphy ... the undergrad who developed the correction capabilities of computers today
... back then, there was no such function conceivable ... kinda like chemtrails are inconceivable to some.
... much like the continual misconception that our government has our best interests at heart. sure, i believe that one as much as i believe all
trails are CONtrails ... Not.
ps: i never stated that chemtrails are such based on observations alone, however, to dismiss observations as the mistaken visuals of a layman sounds
an awful lot like the oligarchy rhetoric that imprisoned Galileo.
do i have scientific proof of chemtrails? nope and i don't intend on producing any either ... my intuition, my health, my sixth sense and my feline
indicators are all i need as proof ... sad that you need more.
