Adam Kokesh Body Slammed for Dancing at Jefferson Memorial, page 45


Pages: <<  42    43    44    45  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 197 times


reply posted on 4-6-2011 @ 08:25 PM by Lemon.Fresh
reply to post by Annee


Respectful?


What better way to RESPECT the man who championed the right to demonstrate by demonstrating (considering dancing is a form of demonstration now, thanks to some nut judge).


reply posted on 4-6-2011 @ 09:39 PM by Annee
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
reply to post by Annee


Respectful?


What better way to RESPECT the man who championed the right to demonstrate by demonstrating (considering dancing is a form of demonstration now, thanks to some nut judge).


I think you have delusional Tunnel Vision.

You're only seeing one immediate thing. Not the later consequences.


reply posted on 4-6-2011 @ 10:11 PM by ker2010
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by Annee


Oh god, the horror! Someone might do the jig, on public property no less! When will this madness end? The insanity! What next?


Or bring their boom boxes and do street dancing.

Personally I don't care - - - but what someone does in a quiet respectful way - - the next person won't - - it will only escalate.

Then what? The Doo-wah parade?

When self-entitlement infringes on the rights of others - - it is pure selfishness. It has nothing to do with constitutional rights. Just selfishness.


Yep how about people texting constantly, people talking loud on cell phones, obese women wearing tight clothes, people with loud uncontrollable kids, rude people etc etc all that stuff aggravates me and a lot of other people. Should we make laws to stop everything others might find annoying?

Dancing and bringing a boom box are different. A boom box can be considered a noise violation or disturbing the peace. But that is a mute argument as all the dancers were neither loud or obnoxious last week. They did nothing that was interfering with anyone enjoying the monument.

How about this, I dont want any cameras taking pictures of the monument while im there flashes annoy me.

Now who is selfish?

edit on 4-6-2011 by ker2010 because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 5-6-2011 @ 12:26 AM by Lemon.Fresh
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
reply to post by Annee


Respectful?


What better way to RESPECT the man who championed the right to demonstrate by demonstrating (considering dancing is a form of demonstration now, thanks to some nut judge).


I think you have delusional Tunnel Vision.

You're only seeing one immediate thing. Not the later consequences.


So what are the later consequences of our right to demonstrate, Annee?


reply posted on 6-6-2011 @ 01:52 AM by TribeOfManyColours
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by TribeOfManyColours
reply to post by Annee


Hey Annee

Without law and all, what is your personal feeling about silent dancing?


I am not against the dancing. However - with no restrictions - then what.

If you make restrictions on the type of dancing - - that's a law.

Ask yourself what comes next.


No man must tell another how to behave. If you put no restrictions on dancing, indeed then what? People are not animals, or stupid?

You can not restrict man, law does not matter. Revolt, and disobey, its about your freedom.

What comes next? A world wide second generation flower power time. Its time we take back full control, and.... see from there

Ask yourself, why did you came forth in this world?

(This movie is bannend in the US en EU, to much for them)
edit on 6-6-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)
edit on 6-6-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 17-6-2011 @ 10:15 PM by Echo3Foxtrot
reply to post by TKDRL


Yeah. I probably should. Usually do, just came back from a short hiatus from ATS and have a lot to read through. Will make amends.
Pages: <<  42    43    44    45  >>    ^^TOP^^