HOME
TOP TOPICS
+
NEW TOPICS
+
ABOUT
+
GET ATS
FORUMS
RECENT POSTS
CREATE ATS ACCOUNT
SEARCH
LOG IN
VOTE... ATS Policy of NO Wikipedia Sources permited on ATS ( yes or no ),
page 7
privacy
Pages:
<<
4
5
6
7
>>
ATS Members have flagged this thread
7
times
reply posted on 4-6-2011 @ 12:11 PM by
TKDRL
reply to
post by BearTruth
I think unsourced would go under skunkworks, no?
reply posted on 4-6-2011 @ 12:14 PM by
hadriana
Yes - if people can't figure out that it is WIKI and what that means by themselves, I don't care.
Wiki is a good place to start looking for information generally, if nothing else.
reply posted on 4-6-2011 @ 12:25 PM by
pikypiky
YES. Wikipedia provides cited sources for each article and may provide a start for further research.
NO. Censorship by registered users of Wikipedia may alter data as we have learned from our "history books".
My answer: Nay. Why? I think "encyclopedias" are larger versions of dictionaries, providing basic background information but doesn't offer interpretations found by other writers.
reply posted on 4-6-2011 @ 12:32 PM by
pazcat
Nope, if you did that you would have to ban most of the sources people bring here anyway. Wiki is far more credible than most people would like you to believe, sure it's not perfect but it's a start. It's certainly a lot better than most youtube videos, beforeitsnews, any website with the word protocol in it and that type of thing.
Pages:
<<
4
5
6
7
>>
^^TOP^^