It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by spinalremain
And just who does it hurt when the wealthy buy a home? A realtor? Construction companies? Construction workers? Vendors and suppliers?
You have a point, but how many homes will each wealthy person buy?
You ave to remember that the wealthy are the vast minority in this country. As I said before, over a long enough timeline, reaganomics HAS to fail. Filtering money through the wealthy for long enough creates stagnation, and eventually the wealthy continue to grow while the middle class, the majority, get stuck in decline.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by spinalremain
And just who does it hurt when the wealthy buy a home? A realtor? Construction companies? Construction workers? Vendors and suppliers?
You have a point, but how many homes will each wealthy person buy?
You ave to remember that the wealthy are the vast minority in this country. As I said before, over a long enough timeline, reaganomics HAS to fail. Filtering money through the wealthy for long enough creates stagnation, and eventually the wealthy continue to grow while the middle class, the majority, get stuck in decline.
ah ok then what if the wealthy continue to buy produce, shoes, clothes, or any other product? Who does that hurt? I'm sick and tired of the foolish class warfare. Besides, what constitutes wealthy? Barry seems to think it;s anyone making over $250,000 a year. Considering what a dollar buys now, thats roughly lower upper class.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by spinalremain
And just who does it hurt when the wealthy buy a home? A realtor? Construction companies? Construction workers? Vendors and suppliers?
Originally posted by gorgi
reply to post by beezzer
Raising the highest tax bracket is not a bad thing. Since when has the idea of "the more one makes the more one pays" become so evil?
Originally posted by SpectreDC
reply to post by beezzer
I hope you know Reagan's main economic advisor was a keynesian economist and supported the fed reserve heavily.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by gorgi
what you call facts is bs show me where the right has killed old people etc.
taxes are theft read the constitution will you like that part where it says ALL TAXES IN THIS COUNTRY MUST BE UNIFORM throughout this land.
the only person lying here is you man
i am not buying what your selling.
Amendment XVI (Ratified February 3, 1913) The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96
It's part of their meme to bash the rich, bash the successful, bash the folks that work.
When the entitlement population is growing in leaps and bounds due to poor mismanagement of the economy BY government, then the only enemy you have left is the wealthy.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96
It's part of their meme to bash the rich, bash the successful, bash the folks that work.
When the entitlement population is growing in leaps and bounds due to poor mismanagement of the economy BY government, then the only enemy you have left is the wealthy.
Doesn't look like theft to me they have the law backing them. The provision your talking about doesn't say you don't have to pay taxes but everyone should pay the same percentage that is the only way it can be uniform.
Originally posted by spinalremain
reply to post by beezzer
Well myself and millions of others wholly disagree with you when it comes to Supply Side economics.
.
Originally posted by wasco2
Originally posted by spinalremain
reply to post by beezzer
Well myself and millions of others wholly disagree with you when it comes to Supply Side economics.
.
Well, of course you do. The far left still hates Reagan and still lies about his accomplishments. I know facts are an anathema to a liberal but here's a whole bunch of them showing reagonomics did in fact work:
www.cato.org...
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Again, I fully get your point. But again I come around to the point that right now, it is about looking at where the wealth is being distributed. We aren't talking about it being distributed to people who make $250,000 a year. We are talking about it being distributed to military contractors of different sorts, many of whom have no anchor in america. The Bush/Obama Keynesian policy is a bastardized version of both trickle down and true Keynesian theory. I believe Palin would follow the same path under a different name.
Originally posted by WeRpeons
reply to post by beezzer
No, they can spend it any way they want to. The problem I have is when they're given tax cuts under the expectations that they're reinvesting it into the economy! If that was the case we wouldn't be losing manufacturing jobs in this country!