I saw this on Yahoo news and am completely appalled by the idea of it all.
I do feel this will completely back fire on them. In the article it
Because Jazz and Kio wear pink and have long hair, they're frequently assumed to be girls, according to Stocker. He said he and Witterick don't
correct people--they leave it to the kids to do it if they want to. But Stocker and Witterick's choices haven't always made life easy for their
kids. Though Jazz likes dressing as a girl, he doesn't seem to want to be mistaken for one. He recently asked his mother to let the leaders of a
nature center know that he's a boy. And he chose not to attend a conventional school because of the questions about his gender. Asked whether that
upsets him, Jazz nodded.
Right there is the answer to all our questions. The kid is already having an issue with the whole thing. Not wanting to attend something bc they dont
want to deal with the gender question. Kids shouldnt have to deal with things like this. They already have a hard enough time growing up and to deal
with being bullied, lets add dressing like the opposite sex. To each their own yes but only if the child is able to understand the consequences. We
all know if you step outside the norm you have to be prepared to deal with the backlash but lets not go throwing our young into the fire just so the
can surpass standards and social norms. Our children should not unknowingly be a social experiment. What is with parents these days and allowing their
children to dress themselves to the point were they're ridiculed?!? Has everything in society become such a hush hush that we allow our youth to set
the examples for adults?!?
People never cease to amaze me