It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dethduck
Rob Lowe said what about Charlie Sheen?
Wait, let me check the math on this.
...relevance to anyone's life....
...carry the one then factor into pi...
...divided by two and a half men...
...where x equals "news"...
...
...
...ah, here we go!
Nope, don't care.
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Maybe this is a crazy question to ask, especially 3 pages into the thread and all but I kind of feel like at least someone has to ask.
How the hell would Charlie Sheen know whether or not the moon was hollow anyway?
Originally posted by Tephra
Speak metaphorically, and suddenly you're insane? He doesn't really think he's a fighter jet. It's called a metaphor. Kinda shocked how many people here recite Mainstream media quotes like it's their job.
Come up with your own crap, you sound like a mindless zombie.
Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by Area51NightStandx
The moon is not hollow. The moons gravity holds sway over our tides yes? The moon needs enormous mass to have that kind of gravity. The moon cannot be hollow and have the gravitational pull that it does. Not to say its just one big chunck of rock. It probably is full of caverns and caves much like earth but no molten core.edit on 27-5-2011 by karen61057 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by gabby2011
You are mistaken, RE: 'hollow moon'.
And, no....not "according to NASA". I know what you are likely referring to. An unfortunate choice of words, long ago, after the first seismometers were placed by Apollo.....
The fact that the seismic waves reverberated....and, one scientist chose the phrase "rang like a bell" leaves the false impression. Because, people have a mental mind's-eye vision of a bell.....which, of course, is 'hollow'.
However, what else can vibrate, and resonate?
A tuning fork.
A solid steel rod.
A piece of solid stone.
Etc....
The Moon is solid, and the resonance was more pronounced than similar situations on Earth, because our liquid core dampens the reverbs...the Moon's is dead, inside....no active, molten 'liquid' center.
edit on Thu 26 May 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
Their studies have shown that the Moon has such a low density that it would float in water......
Originally posted by michaelmcclen
Nice to see a fellow believer way up in Hollywood.
Linki
He also calls him 'smart' , 'nuts' and a 'conspiracy theorist.
Now if this man got behind any movement it sould have serious sway.edit on 26-5-2011 by michaelmcclen because: elaborated & grammar
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by CaptChaos
Oh PLEASE...do site a source for this:
Their studies have shown that the Moon has such a low density that it would float in water......
Can't wait to read it.
And, the Earth molten interior? Documented, many ways. IN fact, it's the reason we have the benefits of a magnetic field.......
The moon also has a magnetic field.
The external magnetic field of the Moon is very weak in comparison to that of the Earth. Other major differences are that the Moon does not currently have a dipolar magnetic field (as would be generated by a geodynamo in its core) and the varying magnetization that is present is almost entirely crustal in origin.
The moon could be hollow.
Originally posted by Argyll
reply to post by CaptChaos
Research seismic P waves and S waves......they will prove that the earth's core has a molten centre.
Simple really.
There are varying reasons why the moon has a mostly crustal field, one of which could be that it's.... hollow.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Tephra
Absolutely wrong.....you dare to claim that I can't read!?:
There are varying reasons why the moon has a mostly crustal field, one of which could be that it's.... hollow.
NO...it clearly states, it's due to the Moon lacking a geo-dynamic core. NOT, that it *lacks* a core...it lacks an ACTIVE core!
And, the simple fact that there is no way, no how that the Moon can be hollow, is due to its known mass and density.
It is not composed of some *magical*, unknown material that would have the required density to exhibit the characteristics of orbit that would be needed for just a *shell* of the Moon.
There is NO planetary formation concept, either, to account for a *hollow* Moon.