Leahy's Protect IP Act (PIPA) or the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA).
Read more:
news.cnet.com...
A bill that all INTERNET USERS and CONTENT WRITERS and WEBSITES in every country WORLDWIDE should be very concerned about...
Read the bill here:
leahy.senate.gov...
www.techdirt.com...
Leahy's Protect IP Act is NOT about:
Whether LEGITIMATE copyright infringement or piracy is acceptable or not. Most already know that piracy, and the like, are criminal acts and breaking
them can lead to fines, prosecution, jail time and civil suits. Piracy is a CRIME with repercussions. This is clearly understood.
Leahy's Protect IP Act is MORE about:
A loosely worded law being enacted (or in this case, online rights and liberties being taken away and censorship being implemented). A bill like this
WILL lead to widespread ABUSE and CENSORSHIP towards websites and website visitors who are NOT committing any acts of piracy. Even the name of the
bill is misleading. Read the language in this bill if you question this statement. The extreme vagueness of the bill is the primary reason it was not
passed THIS TIME. Yet, it will reappear - without a doubt. It is already being rewritten.
Also, more than likely, there will be little or no accountability or repercussions from wrongful, erroneous or overly aggressive "policing" or
"censorship" actions written into this bill. Every persons online activity will be at risk of becoming monitored, taxed, fined, or worse. Even those
NOT perpetrating piracy. Eventually most online liberties as well as privacy will be stripped away all together under the guise of big medias "piracy"
safeguards, protection and regulation. It's like the future Patriot Act for the Internet (or an extension of it).
To stop "piracy", the government must remove "privacy". It's that simple.
I believe in LEGITIMATE copyright protection WHEN it is financed by the media companies who wish to protect THEIR privately owned copyrighted
materials through CURRENT legal methods (litigation, subpoenas, etc). I do not believe taxpayer money and government resources should be used to
assist private companies in protecting private assets or maintaining profitability. This bill benefits and protects the media industry first and
foremost and citizens second (if at all?)
When did the US gov decide to start using taxpayer money to protect private corporate assets (I.E. copyrights, intellectual property, etc). Shouldn't
the US gov instead be focusing on protecting constitutional human rights? Yes, the US government is attempting to prevent a (non-violent) crime of
Piracy and Theft of Intellectual Property - yet I think there are many more pressing matters that need to be attended to with the diminishing US money
and resources.
The US Gov is already seizing domains, without notice, that are NOT violating current piracy laws. Imagine what will happen when more aggressive
"piracy" laws are enacted?
ICE Seizes Domains, Including Sites Not Hosting Pirated Content:
www.digital-digest.com...
www.rawstory.com...
More information about the Protect IP bill:
news.cnet.com...
blogs.forbes.com...
news.cnet.com...
www.eff.org...
www.techdirt.com...
www.eff.org...
www.examiner.com...edit on 29-5-2011 by matito because:
edit on 29-5-2011 by matito because: