Sarah Palin Is about to become the GOP Lead Candidate for POTUS !

reply to post by MaskedDebater


They will be in camo and blackface with twigs on their head. You'll never hear them coming until they start firing their paintballs.

Ahahahahaha, Palin supporters tried to edit Wikipedia in an effort to change history so it'll match up with her false claims

L INK

reply to post by mishigas


Palin supporters have actually been caught going into Wikipedia and REMOVING directly sourced quotes BY Revere himself to change the Midnight Ride into a story that fits Palins ignorant jabbering.

Some set of Patriots we got there. Hancock and Adams are rolling in their graves.

Originally posted by Stratus9
reply to post by mishigas

 

Palin supporters have actually been caught going into Wikipedia and REMOVING directly sourced quotes BY Revere himself to change the Midnight Ride into a story that fits Palins ignorant jabbering.

Some set of Patriots we got there. Hancock and Adams are rolling in their graves.

If you actually went up there like Sarah did you would discover she was telling the truth.
Bill O'Reilly backed her up. He actually went there also. Revere did warn the British.
-------------------------
I guess it's quicker and easier just to smear Gov. Sarah Palin with no facts.
Research is just so exhausting.

reply to post by Stratus9

reply to post by mishigas


Palin supporters have actually been caught going into Wikipedia and REMOVING directly sourced quotes BY Revere himself to change the Midnight Ride into a story that fits Palins ignorant jabbering.

Some set of Patriots we got there. Hancock and Adams are rolling in their graves.

How do I know that the hackers weren't actually libs trying to make Sarah look bad?

reply to post by Eurisko2012

If you actually went up there like Sarah did you would discover she was telling the truth.
Bill O'Reilly backed her up.

Bill O'Reilly? In that case it must be true

That man has infinite wisdom, knowledge and only speaks the truth:





PS: You might wanna read up on history, because if you believe her nonsense, you obviously haven't read enough

Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by Stratus9

 

reply to post by mishigas


Palin supporters have actually been caught going into Wikipedia and REMOVING directly sourced quotes BY Revere himself to change the Midnight Ride into a story that fits Palins ignorant jabbering.

Some set of Patriots we got there. Hancock and Adams are rolling in their graves.

How do I know that the hackers weren't actually libs trying to make Sarah look bad?

Nothing would surprise me now days

reply to post by MrXYZ

PS: You might wanna read up on history, because if you believe her nonsense, you obviously haven't read enough

And you might wanna eat your words, since the Chair of the History Dept. of Suffolk University told NPR that Palin was correct.
NPR

Guess where Suffolk University is? That's right! BOSTON!

And then you might want to check out what a professor of Cornell had to say. Dig that one out yourself.

Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by MrXYZ

 

PS: You might wanna read up on history, because if you believe her nonsense, you obviously haven't read enough

And you might wanna eat your words, since the Chair of the History Dept. of Suffolk University told NPR that Palin was correct.
NPR

I did not get to listen to this but I read the entire transcript and I did not find any proof of what you just wrote in the article that you linked.

Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by MrXYZ

 

PS: You might wanna read up on history, because if you believe her nonsense, you obviously haven't read enough

And you might wanna eat your words, since the Chair of the History Dept. of Suffolk University told NPR that Palin was correct.
NPR

Guess where Suffolk University is? That's right! BOSTON

Funny as I always thought those on the Extreme Right had little regard for those Liberal Professors but I'll bite regardless. Here is the final exchange at the end of the Professor's surprising interpretation from your link:

BLOCK: Are there other historians, Professor, whom you've talked with who say you're being entirely too charitable towards Sarah Palin here, and she really did misread American...

Prof. ALLISON: I haven't talked to many - well, I don't know. I mean, I haven't talked to too many historians today.

And here is what two other notable experts who disagree with your source had to say:

"He didn't warn the British," said James Giblin, author of "The Many Rides of Paul Revere." "That's her most obvious blooper."

"Revere's assignment that night was to go to Lexington to warn Samuel Adams and John Hancock that British troops were moving in that direction from Boston," explained Kristin Peszka, director of interpretation and visitor's services at the Paul Revere House, which Palin visited Thursday.

Source of above quotes plus in depth video:
abcnews.go.com...

Nice one mishigas.

reply to post by MaskedDebater

And here is what two other notable experts who disagree with your source had to say:

Sorry, I'll take Prof. Allison's word over your alleged "experts":

Revere isn't trying to alert the British, but he is trying to warn them. And in April of 1775, no one was talking about independence. We're still part of the British Empire. We're trying to save it. So this is a warning to the British Empire what will happen if you provoke Americans.

BLOCK:Sarah Palin also was saying there that Paul Revere's message to the British in his warning was: You're not going to take American arms - you know, basically a Second Amendment argument, even though the Second Amendment didn't exist then.

Prof. ALLISON: Yeah. She was making a Second Amendment case. But in fact, the British were going out to Concord to seize colonists' arms, the weapons that the Massachusetts Provincial Congress was stockpiling there.

So, yeah, she is right in that.

It is easy to overlook an occasional gaffe as we all misspeak at times. However after a few doozies (purpose of Statue of Liberty, North Korean allies, Paul Revere's ride) one begins to wonder. A simple slip of the tongue could cause dire consequences.

"I support the right to arm bears"



Just thought a little levity was overdue.

/MD

reply to post by mishigas

Revere isn't trying to alert the British, but he is trying to warn them. And in April of 1775, no one was talking about independence.

So I guess the battle of Bunker Hill never happened

You lot are funny, trying to twist history to support current goals...like supporting the 2nd amendment

Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by Stratus9

 

reply to post by mishigas


Palin supporters have actually been caught going into Wikipedia and REMOVING directly sourced quotes BY Revere himself to change the Midnight Ride into a story that fits Palins ignorant jabbering.

Some set of Patriots we got there. Hancock and Adams are rolling in their graves.

How do I know that the hackers weren't actually libs trying to make Sarah look bad?

Because when you go to Wikipedia there are links on each subject page of the complete history of changes- when edits were made- and by whom. It is a side by side comparison with the former posting. There is also a link to each person who made any change or edits- it says 'Talk' - that links to the complete list of their discussions and messages from others and going out to others related to any changes they have made.

I spent about 2 hours the day I made this post studying sources, history, talks, and post- most of the time cracking up at the pathetic attempts by Palin supporters to change the wiki history to fit Palins ignorant bull#. (they were outted on the Talk thread btw).

These people literally removed words written BY Paul Revere and John Hancock regarding that night and tried to substitute them with the insane jabbering of Palin.

Those are some Patriots she has supporting her! *sarcasm.

I can only imagine what they could do to a school history book.

reply to post by Stratus9


Gov. Sarah Palin is STILL about to become the GOP lead candidate for POTUS.
A nationwide release of her movie is coming from AMC!
Over 5,000 theaters!
Coming to a theater near you.........The Undefeated !......
In order to get a distribution deal it has to be good.
- July 15, 2011 Release Date - AMC Theaters
------------------------
Newt self-destructed.
Romney has RomneyCare wrapped around his neck.
The rest in the GOP are - unknowns -. Who ???
-----------------------
We should see a surge after her 1st debate.

Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by Stratus9

 

Gov. Sarah Palin is STILL about to become the GOP lead candidate for POTUS.
A nationwide release of her movie is coming from AMC!

Over 5,000 theaters!

Coming to a theater near you.........The Undefeated !......
In order to get a distribution deal it has to be good.
- July 15, 2011 Release Date - AMC Theaters
------------------------
Newt self-destructed.
Romney has RomneyCare wrapped around his neck.
The rest in the GOP are - unknowns -. Who ???
-----------------------
We should see a surge after her 1st debate.

edit on 10-6-2011 by Eurisko2012 because: (no reason given)

edit on 10-6-2011 by Eurisko2012 because: (no reason given)

And I am really looking forward to it. This election cycle (if Palin is in it) will provide comedy fodder for months to come.

reply to post by Stratus9


There is no comedy today.
Have you seen the Dow Jones today. We are under 12,000.
I can see the value of everyone 401k getting smaller and smaller.
It looks like socialism doesn't work.
-----------------------------
Time to yank out the socialist and vote in a capitalist.

Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Coming to a theater near you.........The Undefeated !......

A movie about a failed VP candidate who lost then quit her elected position mid term. I really do get it but could someone explain that title to me just to be sure. I suppose "The Titanic" and "Gone With the Wind" were already taken.

I'll betcha' it goes straight to DVD which is good. They make great coasters.

I've seen a few previews.

/MD

Originally posted by MaskedDebater

Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Coming to a theater near you.........The Undefeated !......

A movie about a failed VP candidate who lost then quit her elected position mid term. I really do get it but could someone explain that title to me just to be sure. I suppose "The Titanic" and "Gone With the Wind" were already taken.

I'll betcha' it goes straight to DVD which is good. They make great coasters.

I've seen a few previews.

/MD

edit on 10-6-2011 by MaskedDebater because: (no reason given)

The Undefeated is getting rave reviews!
They have already inked a - distribution deal - with AMC.
Are you familiar with show biz?
That means it's a hit.

Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Gov. Sarah Palin is STILL about to become the GOP lead candidate for POTUS.

Correction, Palin STILL hasn't even entered the race, has already missed GOP Presidential Debates, and is only digging herself a deeper hole of greed and corruption to attempt to cover up. Misappropriating SuperPAC funds for a "family vacation" isn't quite what her financial benefactors had in mind with their foolishly placed donations. Then there's the issue that she is still under her multi-year contract with Fox News as an exclusive paid contributor to the network. If she had/has any real intentions of running in 2012, then she's playing a dangerous game, and risking alienating Roger Ailes/Fox News for not being honest and upfront with her intentions. I don't think Fox would appreciate litigation against them for her attempts to play 'coy', and circumventing equal coverage of candidates regulations.

Originally posted by Eurisko2012
A nationwide release of her movie is coming from AMC!

Over 5,000 theaters!

Those Palin binders are in full effect.

First, it's not "her" movie. It's Steve Bannon's/Victory Film Group's. Did you even bother to read the link you sourced?

Palin has seen but has no involvement with 'The Undefeated.'

Second, where are you coming up with your imaginary "Over 5,000 theaters" fantasy? AMC only operates 360 theaters. Rest assured this film will see a VERY limited market (as noted in the link you sourced), and it's ridiculous to imply that they would ever be showing it on over 5,000 of their screens. You're simply showing how unfamiliar you are with what you call "show biz".

Originally posted by Eurisko2012
In order to get a distribution deal it has to be good.

You're joking, right? There are VAST numbers of horrible flops that have received wider distribution deals than this film. Just because a film is given a distribution chance, especially one only for small test markets, does not mean that it's "good", or that the public will like it.

Frankly, your recent postings have been so 'lost in fantasy land' that it's getting hard to tell if you actually do support her, or if you're simply attempting to make her actual supporters look as foolish as the already-existing stereotype they hold.