It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sarah Palin Is about to become the GOP Lead Candidate for POTUS !

page: 27
18
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 1 2011 @ 04:17 PM
link   
reply to post by MaskedDebater
 


Yes you are a riot. Very dry wit. Good one. Reminds me of an old Don Knotts joke. I'll save it for another day.

I am just enjoying the press squirm and squeal as they try to keep up with such a non issue that happens to be named Palin. This is killing them and sadly they can't take what they have been dishing out against her since day one.

Those big graphic laden tour buses sure are hard to follow
I will certainly let Palin's plan play out as it continues to illuminate the MSM for the true partisan hacks that they are.




posted on Jun, 1 2011 @ 06:35 PM
link   
reply to post by jibeho
 


Speaking of squealing and squirming, I hope she does run. Aren't there several debates for Presidential candidates as opposed to just one like before for VP? I'm guessing she hasn't used the last two years to brush up on any of her political, economic or diplomacy weaknesses. She'll be debating several other contenders as opposed to just one. Should be a hoot. But I think she's been preoccupied developing her celebrity and brand image. I'm thinking a line of perfume is on the horizon, too bad "Obsession" is already taken. Maybe "Mama Grizzly Musk." LOL

Krauthammer: Palin "Not Schooled" In Policy; Doesn't Know She Needs It




I like her political overall view of the world -- but when it comes to policy, she had two-and-a-half years to school herself and she hasn't and that's a problem," Charles Krauthammer told Bill O'Reilly on Tuesday. "It's not only the lack of schooling, it's the lack of effort to school herself and the lack of insight to see that she needs it."


www.realclearpolitics.com...

From a notable conservative commentator.

/MD
edit on 1-6-2011 by MaskedDebater because: (no reason given)

edit on 1-6-2011 by MaskedDebater because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 1 2011 @ 11:00 PM
link   
reply to post by MaskedDebater
 


Nice reference to Krauthamer. He is certainly one of my favorites he speaks with honesty including his words about Palin. I don't know what she is up to. I do hope she has fun keeping the press swarm guessing about her next move. As far as her foreign policy expertise goes... she might just be a couple of points higher than our current National Admistrator in chief.

She is good at rallying and getting attention. It's time to put the nations attention back on the constitution.



posted on Jun, 1 2011 @ 11:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by MaskedDebater
 


Nice reference to Krauthamer. He is certainly one of my favorites he speaks with honesty including his words about Palin. I don't know what she is up to. I do hope she has fun keeping the press swarm guessing about her next move. As far as her foreign policy expertise goes... she might just be a couple of points higher than our current National Admistrator in chief.

She is good at rallying and getting attention. It's time to put the nations attention back on the constitution.



and self reliance. :
:

charles has an intellectual bias, i'm a fan, he is a brilliant guy.

but he still recognizes her as a force and maybe he is bucking for a post?

if brain power were all that it takes to be POTUS

then we just give IQ tests to anyone and winner takes all.

like comic book guy or www.marilynvossavant.com...

she is hot too.

it takes more than brains to run a company or a country or live in this world.

gates had his dad's firm as his legal council, he would have been not as successful as he is.

it's who you surround yourself with that makes a winning team. a leader knows what his people can or can't do,

use any analogy you want, sports, commerece, fishing, bowling, O.J.



posted on Jun, 1 2011 @ 11:53 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 


You have got to be kidding me...Katie Couric and Matt Damon?


Yeah, there's a couple of mental giants!



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 12:00 AM
link   
reply to post by jibeho
 




She is good at rallying and getting attention. It's time to put the nations attention back on the constitution.


And that is exactly what she has been doing for the past couple of years. Her impact on the 2010 elections cannot be denied. She went cross-country endorsing and fundraising for true conservative candidates, and she did a damn good job at getting lots of liberals out of office.



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 02:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by MrXYZ
 


You have got to be kidding me...Katie Couric and Matt Damon?


Yeah, there's a couple of mental giants!


All she did was ask where Palin gets her news from (which is important given the nonsense she shouts around), and Palin couldn't even answer a simple question like that. Why? Because who cares about news and facts if you can just make stuff up....like she does?


And Matt Damon was spot on, I wanna know too if she really believes dinosaurs roamed the earth 4,000 years ago...and yeah, I wanna know because if she ever turns out to be president, she'll have the nuclear codes. And if she's lunatic enough to take the bible literally, I wouldn't want her to have those codes...just like I don't want the crazy guy on Times Square to have them



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 02:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by jibeho
 




She is good at rallying and getting attention. It's time to put the nations attention back on the constitution.


And that is exactly what she has been doing for the past couple of years. Her impact on the 2010 elections cannot be denied. She went cross-country endorsing and fundraising for true conservative candidates, and she did a damn good job at getting lots of liberals out of office.


A short list of Palin endorsed candidates in 2010.

Sharon Angel - LOSS
Christine O'Donnell -LOSS
Carly Fiorina - LOSS
John Raese - LOSS
Tom Tancredo - LOSS
Stephen Broden - LOSS
Ray McKinney - LOSS
Star Parker - LOSS
Ilaro Pantano - LOSS
Morgon Phillpot - LOSS
Jackie Walorski - LOSS
Bill Marcy - LOSS
Tim Burns - LOSS
Sean Bielat - LOSS
Janet Contreras - LOSS
Ruth McClung - LOSS
John Gomez - LOSS
Rita Meyer - LOSS
Cecilia Heil - LOSS
Angela McGlowan - LOSS
Cecile Bledsoe - LOSS
Karen Handel - LOSS
Brian Murphy - LOSS
Clint Didier - LOSS
Bob McConnell - LOSS
Vaughn Ward - LOSS
Todd Tiahrt - LOSS
Doug Hoffman - LOSS

I am sure you are right. I doubt any of those people would deny her impact on the race.


Jim Newell —Sarah Palin hit Twitter today to endorse another "Mama Grizzly": John "Sky-Lasers" Raese for Pennsylvania's Senate seat! While Raese must appreciate the nod, he probably wishes she'd endorsed him for West Virginia's seat instead, since that's where he's running.


We know John felt it.

edit on 2-6-2011 by Antiquated1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 06:37 AM
link   
BREAKING................

The speculation is abuzz right now regarding "The Bus to Nowhere Tour" It seems (to me) that the Palin coyness and mystique may have backfired. You see Ms Palin has stated that her trip is merely a family vacation and yet it is funded by Sarahpac, her Political Action Committee. As she has yet to announce a Presidential run, reports are swirling that she may be in violation of FEC rules if campaign donations are being used for personal expenses. Whoops.

In addition, her relationship with FOX News seems to be strained and is said to be tenuous. If she is a candidate and remains on their payroll they would be bound to offer "equal time" to other candidates in accordance with FEC rules. Further, as Ms Palin is quick to point out, she shuns the "Lame Stream Media" and FOX is her only Friend (j/k) Like it or not, if she alienates herself from all media outlets including FOX, a presidential run from a hostile press is a steep hill to climb.

It appears this whole spectacle may very well lead to her undoing, a Catch 22 of sorts. If she is "forced" to run she exposes her utter incompetence, lack of experience and dubious credentials to a skeptical press and curious voting public and thereby destroys her credibility. On the other hand if she doesn't run she'll have to reimburse Sarahpac or perhaps face stiff fines and penalties and return to FOX as just another blathering brainless talking head.

Oh and for all the Palin groupies so enamored by her ability to create media frenzy. Two words (or is it three?) Lady GaGa. I thought you all loathed those Hollywood celebrity types?

Eat your heart out Matt Drudge, two can play at this game. (Smear, innuendo and speculation without factual basis.) Yeah, I made this all up. Or did I?


/MD
edit on 2-6-2011 by MaskedDebater because: streamline flow

edit on 2-6-2011 by MaskedDebater because: tone down partisan rhetoric



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 07:15 AM
link   
reply to post by mishigas
 




The issue here is Sarah Palin, not Obama.
edit on 2-6-2011 by aero56 because: to edit



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 07:20 AM
link   
reply to post by MaskedDebater
 


Thank you, friend. Her narcissistic personalty is pathetic.



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 07:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by jibeho
 




She is good at rallying and getting attention. It's time to put the nations attention back on the constitution.


And that is exactly what she has been doing for the past couple of years. Her impact on the 2010 elections cannot be denied. She went cross-country endorsing and fundraising for true conservative candidates, and she did a damn good job at getting lots of liberals out of office.


She is no fan of the Constitution. She may SAY and even THINK she is, but she has demonstarted no real knowledge of it, no interest in really learning about it and when its tenets make her uncomfortable, she acts like all would-be autocrats and looks for retribution. My guess is that she has never once studied the Constitution and certainly not the causes and actions that led up to it, nor the written record through letters by the Founders of what they were trying to accomplish. She has no frame of reference; she only knows the basic WORDS.

To further support my guess, I look to her religious values. She is a biblical literalist. Biblical literalists also have NO FRAME of reference or context for the WORDS that appear in the bible. All she knows is the words and that's good enough for her.

Put it this way, if she read the words, "See Spot run," she'd only be note that Spot was running...that is what the words say. It does not occur to her ask, "Why is Spot running?" Is he running for joy, maybe catching a frisbee...or is he running away from a predator or the local dog catcher? She'd not be inclined to wonder if Spot have an owner or not, placing him at risk of euthanasia should he be caught.

What I am getting at is this crass, shallow woman has ZERO intellectual curiosity. That's dangerous. I can provide endless examples why that is dangerous, but I'll hope instead that ATS users have enough intellectual curiosity themselves to think of their own examples.



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 07:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by aero56
reply to post by mishigas
 




The issue here is Sarah Palin, not Obama.
edit on 2-6-2011 by aero56 because: to edit


The issue is always Obama now. There is a standard formula that I believe was perfected when these same posters were defending Bush for anything and everything. It used to be that if you tried to point out Bush in comparison to someone else, the standard response was basically that Bush had nothing to do with anything ever again and should never be mentioned. Now they perfected the 180 Obama trick. This thread has it a few times.

Here is how it goes.
1. Someone criticizes someone on the right (Palin) for just about anything.
2. Jibeho, Mishigas, Thirdeye, etc will then respond with some variation of "Well Obama sucks because of X"
3. Then they will declare that your comment about the actual topic, a right wing person equates to you not only supporting but practically worshiping Obama.
4. They then dismiss you as a person due to the link they just made up between you and Obama over X.
5. Your legitimate complaint is rendered void and you need to then move on to defending your character.

That damn Obama is behind everything. I think the State of Hawaii and Frank Marshall Davis are involved as well. Your problem is that many of you see Palin write things and hear her say things. You then remember those words in context and what she meant when she said them. Many of you also seem to pay attention to the facts behind the things she says instead of just believing her because she winks. Then you base this opinion of yours on the reality of who Palin is. Unfortunately, that is in itself indefensible so it really has to be about Obama. Just ask Palin. She lost her run for "co-president" because according to her, McCain's people screwed everything up.

It could not be more clear that nothing about Palin is ever actually about Palin. She has never been guilty of anything herself so other people are to blame. Look at her daughter. Hey, Sarah did a wonderful job as a mother and refused to teach her daughter about birth control because she had high hopes for abstinence only (AKA - pretend kids dont get horny and hope it all works out) and that worked out beautifully. She taught her other daughter great Christian values before she ran off on facebook calling people words I cannot even allude to on ATS.

People, get off her back. Palin would be queen of the world if Obama was not such a crappy president. I don't know how that cant make sense.

Anyone unable to discern which parts were sarcasm should refrain from responding.



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 08:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Antiquated1

Originally posted by aero56
reply to post by mishigas
 




The issue here is Sarah Palin, not Obama.
edit on 2-6-2011 by aero56 because: to edit


The issue is always Obama now. There is a standard formula that I believe was perfected when these same posters were defending Bush for anything and everything. It used to be that if you tried to point out Bush in comparison to someone else, the standard response was basically that Bush had nothing to do with anything ever again and should never be mentioned. Now they perfected the 180 Obama trick. This thread has it a few times.

Here is how it goes.
1. Someone criticizes someone on the right (Palin) for just about anything.
2. Jibeho, Mishigas, Thirdeye, etc will then respond with some variation of "Well Obama sucks because of X"
3. Then they will declare that your comment about the actual topic, a right wing person equates to you not only supporting but practically worshiping Obama.
4. They then dismiss you as a person due to the link they just made up between you and Obama over X.
5. Your legitimate complaint is rendered void and you need to then move on to defending your character.

That damn Obama is behind everything. I think the State of Hawaii and Frank Marshall Davis are involved as well. Your problem is that many of you see Palin write things and hear her say things. You then remember those words in context and what she meant when she said them. Many of you also seem to pay attention to the facts behind the things she says instead of just believing her because she winks. Then you base this opinion of yours on the reality of who Palin is. Unfortunately, that is in itself indefensible so it really has to be about Obama. Just ask Palin. She lost her run for "co-president" because according to her, McCain's people screwed everything up.

It could not be more clear that nothing about Palin is ever actually about Palin. She has never been guilty of anything herself so other people are to blame. Look at her daughter. Hey, Sarah did a wonderful job as a mother and refused to teach her daughter about birth control because she had high hopes for abstinence only (AKA - pretend kids dont get horny and hope it all works out) and that worked out beautifully. She taught her other daughter great Christian values before she ran off on facebook calling people words I cannot even allude to on ATS.

People, get off her back. Palin would be queen of the world if Obama was not such a crappy president. I don't know how that cant make sense.

Anyone unable to discern which parts were sarcasm should refrain from responding.


I am honored to get name dropped in one of your posts Mr. Sinnthia. Nice how you and your friend continue to drop in on the same threads to trash posters without ever directly defending your hero and his policies. It's all about your ire for individual posters and your passion for word play that keeps you coming back to ATS under a countless variety of usernames. Good Work! I am looking forward to an interesting election cycle. Just shoot me a new U2U when you change your user name so I can keep up.
edit on 2-6-2011 by jibeho because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 08:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by Antiquated1
Here is how it goes.
1. Someone criticizes someone on the right (Palin) for just about anything.
2. Jibeho, Mishigas, Thirdeye, etc will then respond with some variation of "Well Obama sucks because of X"
3. Then they will declare that your comment about the actual topic, a right wing person equates to you not only supporting but practically worshiping Obama.
4. They then dismiss you as a person due to the link they just made up between you and Obama over X.
5. Your legitimate complaint is rendered void and you need to then move on to defending your character.


Excellent summary! Just to add that somewhere along their scripted response they will accuse us 'Obamanots' of playing the race card. It happens without fail.

BTW, I dig your sarcasm. It is biting and effective.


/MD



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 08:12 AM
link   
reply to post by MaskedDebater
 


Right on cue!! As usual
Thanks for playing

Back on topic

All I have commented on in this particular thread is that I enjoy watching Palin turn the screw on the press that has continually tried to screw her and her family from day one. I don't think she is ready to be President nor did I think Obama was ready either. Biden agreed with me on that front. Right now she is getting the crowd fired up for the coming election.

Sorry if I mentioned Obama in my post

edit on 2-6-2011 by jibeho because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-6-2011 by jibeho because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 08:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by MaskedDebater
 


Well, she's apparently achieving one of her goals....getting the lib's knickers in a knot!


Yes, NBC is at DEFCON 1 ! Following the Gov. Sarah Palin bus and complaining that they feel
like the paparazzi.

---------------------------------------
At the same time we get news that the U.S. economy is in terrible shape and getting worse.
It looks like socialism doesn't work.
Is anyone surprised?
If the remaining members of Al Qaeda want to destroy America, they better hurry up or
Obama will beat them to it.



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 09:54 AM
link   
wow, the anti palin crowed has just kicked it up a notch!

lol, lots of smear now!



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 01:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by jibeho
Nice how you and your friend continue to drop in on the same threads to trash posters without ever directly defending your hero and his policies.


Since I already addressed your other fantasies in the U2U exchange we had, let me just thank you for proving my point. This thread is about Palin. What I have presented are facts about Palin. You respond by talking about Obama.

Exactly as I said you specifically would do. You came to this thread about Palin, responding to me to falsely claim Obama is my hero for no reason other than because I have negative things to say about Palin and then tried to dismiss my character based on your false premise that I do not defend my hero.

You just did exactly what I said you would do. You get that, right?
edit on 2-6-2011 by Antiquated1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 2 2011 @ 01:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by fooks
wow, the anti palin crowed has just kicked it up a notch!


Or as most folks know us as patriotic American citizens with a great deal of common sense who shudder at the thought of an imbecile leading our great land. The lady is a shiver looking for a spine to run up.





lol, lots of smear now!



Us? Never. Not when the "Lame Stream Media" does such a fine job. Attention K-Mart shoppers.


/MD
edit on 2-6-2011 by MaskedDebater because: address poor spelling



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join