It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sarah Palin Is about to become the GOP Lead Candidate for POTUS !

page: 14
18
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 27 2011 @ 01:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by Version100

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Version100
 


Best of luck? Ok


Well, since you have brutishly told me I need to get an edumacation like ol Bush, here is my lecture to you on Hegelian Dialectic reasoning as used by those who are undermining our country, and please note the infiltration of that intellectual institution YALE by members of Skull and Bones and the famed RUSSELL Trust.

www.sntp.net...


Which, once again, has nothing to do with the context of this conversation.

No matter how hard you try to push this onto me it still has nothing to
do with what I originally posted.

You are living in some world where context does not matter, where you
can just keep pushing things that are non sequitur to the dialogue.

I think we all get it that you are unhappy with the treatment of Sarah Palin
but that just doesn't have anything to do with the original subject matter.

I'm most sorry but repeating yourself over and over will not make you
correct.







Every single post you make to me is full of nasty little quips and insults. Do you hear yourself? Sarah can take care of herself I have no doubt.
I am not going to post to you again after this, so time to go pick on someone else with your rude remarks.

edit on 27-5-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

edit on 27-5-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 27 2011 @ 01:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


Good luck with that! Or is it "Sucked in"? She comes across as a real bimbo over here in Australia!



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 02:29 AM
link   
There is no way she would win anything really valid. She exists to take up space.
edit on 27-5-2011 by jetflock because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 02:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by captaintyinknots
You probably ought not be on here throwing out arguments that you do not understand.


Actually if it weren't for places like ATS, these people would probably have nothing to do. They'd be out making and raising dumb-as-fruit kids and grandkids. Thus I believe that ATS and websites like it provide a clear social benefit, by occupying the pig-ignorant among us, thereby preventing them from doing anything destructive.



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 03:09 AM
link   
Ron Paul would destroy her if he was ever given a fair shake. You see how popular he is already with almost no real media coverage. It's funny how the major news networks keep trying to ignore him like he doesn't exist, when he is only trailing Palin by 5% in the latest poll.



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 03:28 AM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


She keeps it all in the Family. The bloodline rules.



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 03:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by AuntB
reply to post by Scytherius
 
Now I like the idea of her running for a Senate seat. Too many people, including myself were disappointed that she stepped down from her Governorship. She needs to complete a term in higher office then mayor.



How can you Palin people support a person who resigned from an elected position of serving her supporters to make money. Wasn't she facing a criminal investigation for corruption too?

With her actions She has proven that her only goal is too make money. Her political career is dead
But still you convince yourself she's running? She doesn't care about you she sees you as a paycheck, she.is playing a character to appeal to a demographic.

The support for her and people like her is an example of the sad state of intelligence and comprehension in the USA.

edit on 27-5-2011 by drock905 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 04:05 AM
link   
reply to post by bigdaddy7ftr
 


i wouldn't trust ron with the security of the usa at all.

he'd be great as a financial czar or the equivalent of a fed CFO , no doubt. get rid of barney.

i don't see him dealing with foreign affairs, in anyway for our advantage.

sarah would just confound everyone, lol!

kim jong il was gaga over albright! imagine what sarah could do.

anyway, her strengths would be, no apologies, no bowing, no bs, "i mean what i say" for real.

golda maier, thatcher, indira ghandi, bhutto and cleopatra.

anyway, point is the usa could use an edge. i don't trust good ol' boys.

all you get is the same 'ol. let sarah take on the big dogs. she would surround herself with decent people.

isn't a general only as good as his soldiers? a boss only as good as his workers?

she can take a punch, can paul, rommney?

besides, she hasn't announced anything yet, if at all.



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 05:36 AM
link   
I don't think Sarah Palin can win the GOP nomination, she is far too dumb to get it done.

Popular- YES
Competent- NO.

She sold herself to the entertainment industry and I'm sure that is comfortable enough for her. She makes speeches to her 'tea party' fans to stay relevant and important.

2012 is Ron Paul all the way. Let's not give Palin anymore attention on ATS, she doesn't really deserve it unless it is for entertainment reasons.



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 05:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by Misoir
Is the GOP trying to intentionally throw 2012 or can my fellow Republicans truly be that stupid? Michele Bachmann would even be better than Sarah Palin. There is no way I could ever vote for that woman because I have yet to hear anything intelligent come out of her mouth that is genuinely a constructed thought of her own. She cannot even capture 40% of the vote in even her best polling against Obama. If she gets the nomination the race will be the same as 1964.

If you want to throw the election nominate Palin.


I don't think they want to be in "control" and do want to "throw" the election. It's a lot better for PR... plus, they can concentrate on getting more seats in congress.

She's either running to make another republican candidate look stronger, because as of now there isn't really a clear leader, or they aren't really interested in the presidency this term.

ETA: Has she even declared yet? i know of Polenti, Cain, Hunstman, Gingrich... I know I'm leaving a few out.
edit on 27-5-2011 by GringoViejo because: (no reason given)

edit on 27-5-2011 by GringoViejo because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 06:24 AM
link   
reply to post by 27jd
 





I don't agree with everything Ron Paul stands for, but I certainly agree with alot of his positions. It remains to be seen if he would keep his word if elected. It seems most politicians don't.....


At least Ron Paul has kept his word so far and he has been in and out of DC politics since the late seventies. He is also old enough to remember what the USA was like before we had bureaucrats breathing down our necks watching every move we make.

Do I agree with everything he says? Of course not. But I agree with his general direction. Give control of our lives back to our local governments where the consent of the governed might actually mean something.

Best of all get rid of the FED! The blood sucking vampires that have driven this country to her knees.



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 06:54 AM
link   
Why I feel Sarah Palin won’t Run or in other words why this thread premise is a load of hooey.

Several weeks ago Roger Ailes, of FOX News issued a directive aimed at it’s paid political contributors that if they were going to make a bid for 2012 Presidential Election run they should step down. As we all know, Gingrich and Santorum obliged and Huckabee remained on board after a conversation with GOD in favor of keeping his gig and building a big new house in Florida with indoor plumbing.

Of the Presidential hopefuls, Palin also remains on board with FOX but continues to be coy while making frequent “Fire in the Belly” overtures. In essence she is pulling a “Trump.” (This fact alone should rile her supporters.)

Given that plus the fact that Ms Palin has had a taste of champagne after a life of Budweiser with her lucrative book deals and paid speaking engagements and compounded by the fact that she has neglected to use the last two years to brush up on global economics and world affairs years after an abysmal VP run and failed reality show by taking the easy ride at FOX as paid political pundit. I don’t see her giving up her new found celebrity and affluence to serve her country. Had she enrolled in some post graduate classes on macro economics or foreign affairs instead of cashing in on her 15 minutes of fame I might feel differently.

Her #2 spot in polls (2nd place = 1st loser) is easily attributable to the attrition by the other GOP front runners and weak second tier. The newly announced short “bus tour” is ego driven Branding and she hasn’t engaged any real strategists or political experts in earnest to indicate a sincere run.

Oh and by the way as a card carrying liberal I don’t fear Sarah Palin as many suggest. What I DO fear is this nimwit potentially having the power to launch nuclear weapons and further environmentally destroy our planet with reckless disregard.

But even if I’m wrong, it is a win-win. I so look forward to her political antics and fancy pageant walking. If asked about her cabinet appointments she’d probably reply "Dark wood with silver knobs."

Everyone is welcome to my opinion. LOL /MD
edit on 27-5-2011 by MaskedDebater because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 06:57 AM
link   


vote 3rd party. it is not a wasted vote. voting for any of the main party fools is the waste.
reply to post by Tonosama
 


Exactly.

I would rather keep my dignity and "Waste my vote" on someone I actually believe in. Anyone who votes with someone who's policy they don't agree with, just because they're slightly better than some other politician who's policy they don't believe in, reaps what they sow.

Don't make it easy on them make them work for your votes and soon they'll realise that they work for the people, not the lobbyists.



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 06:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by anon72
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


She is a smart one. That is what is pissing them all off. They can't figure her out and what/why people like her.


They like her because she is stupid and most people are also stupid, therefore they can easily relate to her. Sad but true.



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 07:11 AM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
[m

This is scary, after watching people putting Bush in for two terms and then in Fl. voting in a criminal for governor, I have no doubt that Palin has a chance. The stupidity of the voting public makes one want to go into the woods and hide. Oh well, it will be a carnival to many and that is all it is about, entertainment of the masses. I am glad I have pulled back from being an American or any affiliation for that matter, just an observer of the silliness that goes on here on earth.



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 07:16 AM
link   
reply to post by intelinside451
 





All I hear on ATS is how much we despise big government, new policies, more restrictions on our lives, less privacy, etc, etc, etc. Yet, most of the people on here are liberals? Isn't that like pouring gas on a fire?


Actually I think most here on ATS are independents. the "Political Class" shows up when the election campaigns start warming up. They hope to sway our vote or at least make us believe our favorite candidate had "No REAL Chance" to win an election.

I think Palin has been thrown at us to divide the Ron Paul camp and muddy the waters.

I understand your point about "Apple Pie" but Palin just does not have the background or seasoning in politics that it takes to make it.

Yes the Libs gave her a real hard time when she was in the governor's seat, but do you think the presidency would be any better???? HECK they are STILL crucifying BUSH although it was the laws and treaties CLINTON signed that wiped our economy off the map!

NOTE to the libs: I will defend my position now and save you the bother of flaming at me



We will start with a Repub:

The Looting of U.S. Corporations under Reagan...

The "deregulation" that occurred under Ronald Reagan resulted in the takeover and looting of many cash-rich U.S. corporations through leveraged buyouts involving junk bonds.....

This looting resulted in the loss of many jobs and in the significant reduction of pension benefits. Many corporate pension plans that were well-funded and invested in very safe securities were closed. The proceeds were used to set up new pension plans through the purchase of junk bonds. This scam was permitted by the passage of a law that allowed a pension plan to be closed and a new one established, provided that the new pension plan had the same "expected benefits" as the old plan. Pension actuaries were paid off to attest that this was the case. The sellers of the junk bonds made out like bandits. But when the junk bonds collapsed, many retirees saw their pension benefits reduced significantly--in some cases by more than two-thirds......


Next on to a Democrat.
CLINTON:
Clinton was the President who Ratified the North American Free Trade Agreement and the World Trade Organization Treaties and then got China admitted to the WTO.

Gene Sperling (Clinton's . of the National Economic Council) and William Daley (Clinton's Sec of Commerce) worked on China’s entry into the World Trade Organization, an event which caused millions of manufacturing jobs in U.S. to be permanently lost. Currently General Electric CEO Jeffery Immelt has been tapped to lead a newly created Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. Obama is appointing this team of three Internationalists to spear. his economic policies.

Next is the Banking fiasco. Clinton signed into law many of the "new improved" Banking Laws that lead to the Economic meltdown:


Consolidation of Mega Banks, AIG Bailout and Foreclosuregate: Quick list of Banking laws

After the Great Depression, several laws were put in place to prevent another depression. The 1933 and 1934 Security and Exchange laws, The McFadden Act of 1927, The Glass-Steagall Act or Banking Act of 1933. Also Bank Holding Company Act of 1956.

Clinton's laws Negating above: Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999

More pro-banking Clinton laws:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991: Allowed big banks to gobble up smaller banks more easily.

Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 and RTC Completion Act - Housing and business loans to unqualified minorities.

Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 - left CDSs unregulated and set up AIG bailout and Foreclosuregate. A Great article detailing the set up of the AIG bailout and Foreclosuregate.

BACK to a repub.
BUSH- the AIG bailout and DOUBLING the money supply. (AIG, was 80% nationalized by the U.S. government)

Obama - Continue Bankrupting the American people and destroying the dollar, Effectively lower wages to "international levels" using QE 2 and possibly QE 3

Obama-Dodd financial bill would further enrich Goldman Sachs The "bill would reward the firm with potentially billions of dollars by instituting a so-called “resolution authority” that would, in practice, be a permanent bailout fund."



“To ensure that the mortgage servicer pushes default instead of workout, the servicer is paid double (50 basis points versus 25 basis points) by the MBS to service a loan in default. Why do you think your servicer tells you that you must be in default before it will consider a mortgage modification, a practice known as invited default?

“Simply put,” says Parker, “the government bailout of AIG has actually encouraged foreclosures because the taxpayers continue to fill AIG’s coffers with enough cash to pay out insurance on defaulted home loans.”

...CDS premium revenue is not restricted to those who might have actual losses or real assets to protect. You can bet as much as you want and create as many CDS as you want....
www.realtytrac.com...






For those into conspiracies, much of this can be linked back to the Rhodes Scholarships, set up by Cecil Rhodes and run by the Rothschilds and the Fabians who set up the London School of Economics where many bankers and future leaders are trained. (Fabian Society Literally Control the European Union)


Carroll Quigley, an influential former history professor at the Foreign Service Schools of Georgetown University. ...Bill Clinton's mentor,.. [stated]

"There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years, and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records.... [I]n general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown...."[5]

In other words, this conspiracy was international from the start. And, beginning with the British diamond magnate, Cecil Rhodes, it was grounded in enormous wealth -- riches acquired through capitalism, not through the global socialism it envisions for all but the elite. The key players were power-driven bankers, rich corporations, and tax-free foundations that controlled the resources needed to buy the cooperation of publishers,
media moguls, educational institutions, and government leaders across the political spectrum.... www.crossroad.to...



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 07:20 AM
link   
reply to post by pyrodude
 


She doesn't scare liberals.. she horrifies anyone with any intelligence with the idea that someone as ignorant as her could be pushed into office via the ignorant mislead constantly trampled on masses.



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 07:23 AM
link   
I think Eurisko is taking the piss.



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 07:47 AM
link   
Maybe someone can help me out here.

What 'specifically' disqualifies Sarah Palin from being president, and how is she different compared to Obama in 2008?



posted on May, 27 2011 @ 08:08 AM
link   
reply to post by Section31
 


Perfect question. They are afraid of her, for a woman to be a conservative scares liberals to death. This lady, even though she is not a great on point speaker, has more experience on the administrative level in her pinky than obama has in his whole body.

Palin has been on city councils, been a mayor, been a govenor, business owner. (Had to make tough decisions)
Obama- community organizer. (What is that)

Please read: You draw your own conclusions. These are just mine.
sharprightturn.wordpress.com...



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join