reply to post by dillweed
reply to post by OutKast SearcherI'll tell you why they leave, because they know that anyone who would vote for that skinny socialist is either
stupid, lazy or both. As bad as Bush was, this guy is ten times worse for the future of this country. The MSM tells me that six out of ten favor
Barry. I say that's pure horsesh*t ! I dont know one 'employed' person who would vote for him. NOT ONE!
Believe me, you're wasting your breath. They are only seeking attention. I spent time refuting many 'facts' they stated, and guess what? They didn't
debate my arguments. Instead, they cry Foul! and accuse me of personal attacks and vitriol. Then, after they lay that groundwork, they expect you to
debate with them.
I've asked for examples of my personal attacks; they go silent. How can we improve communication when they play the sullen, sulking victim?
New definition of vitriol: a fact that a lib finds too painful to accept. The phrase "You can't handle the truth!" comes to mind.
All joking aside, some 'facts' put forth are so vague that they are un-debatable. I mean, how can you argue with a statement like "Obama implemented
many programs to help out the middle class"? WHAT programs? But don't ask, because you'll be accused of vitriol and personal attacks.
My mistake was falling for the ruse. I honestly thought this thread was an attempt to discuss the pros and cons of voting for Obama, when all it was
was a pep rally for BHO. But that is their right, to author such a thread. I have the choice of playing by their rules or leaving.
I wish them good luck.
edit on 27-5-2011 by mishigas because: (no reason given)