It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dannijca
reply to post by panicman66
lololol?? This is art? Ask her what the picture means.
Originally posted by sapien82
awesome , if and when I have kids their bedroom walls are going to be one giant canvas !
Just to add , for those thinking we should get our kids interested in science and energy and space at an early age , yes thats great , but if we cant get our kids to openly express themselves , then they may never have the great ideas and imagination to come up with future science
Art is humanities last great bastion of hope , art in music , art in sculpture , performance art . without it us humans would be nothing more than mindless drones !edit on 27-5-2011 by sapien82 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sleepypoet
reply to post by krossfyter
Well, to me, that is exactly the problem. Not just with her, but with a lot of art in this nature. Why are people paying thousands of dollars for a painting that is truly inane, even to the artist?
Originally posted by sleepypoet
I'm a chef, and every plate I put out has to be perfectly cooked and aesthetically pleasing. Every plate I produce has to mean something to me and the guest, in my case I insist on using all locally grown food. This provides my art with depth, not just ripping open a bag of frozen food and throwing it in a fryer.
Originally posted by sleepypoet
I am all for art of all kinds, but as I stated in an earlier post, she should have had time to nurture her artistic ability before being exploited for her talent so her art does have meaning.
Originally posted by sleepypoet
reply to post by krossfyter
Honestly, I agree with just about everything you said. I'm not gonna argue with you, I really just don't personally enjoy this type of art. I appreciate the use of colors, but it doesn't appeal to me. I also agree with the fact that I'm just not in tuned to art as people who have taken classes and who are professional artists. But, that's why I don't portray my art with paint and canvas, I prefer food and a plate.
I appreciate your input, and have taken it to mind and I hope I can broaden my horizons to appreciate this art form more. For, as an artist as well, one should find the beauty, the story, etc. in everything. I just find it difficult to find the narrative in these types of paintings.
The Michael Jackson parallel was well placed, touche! I hope she does become an amazing artist, I guess it's more that I really really hope her parents are just being supportive parents and are not just exploiting her. Only time will tell.
Originally posted by masqua
reply to post by sleepypoet
Art is art, no matter what the medium and a good chef is every bit a creative artist. However, I'd certainly NOT allow little Aelita to cook for me.
Originally posted by sleepypoet
reply to post by krossfyter
My apologies if this post becomes irrelevant to the thread too much. But, in terms of culinary art, there are many chefs who push their boundaries aesthically all the time. The one trend that I'm trying to veer away from professionally is the "vertical" trend. To me, it's the abstract aspect of the culinary world. David Sedaris said it best, that in a world full of skyscrapers, it's as if chefs invested in a small parcel of the plate with unlimited sky rights, the rest is reserved for a parking lot apparently.
But, the one aspect of culinary art I can not stomach is a restaurant in California that is serving "farm to table" chicken sashimi. I'll eat chicken in a million and one different ways, but I can't fathom eating it raw.edit on 27-5-2011 by sleepypoet because: wrong reply to person!