It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by krossfyter
thats why he is famous.
anyone can make a mess sure. not anyone can just make a pollock. bad copies... sure.
can u be original and get a critic to take notice?
Originally posted by LucidDreamer85
reply to post by j3n9ls31dy
please do us all a favor and get over your own ego.
this thread has to do with a little girl who really enjoys painting and if they keep her interested could someday take care of herself via painting...= it's a skill not everyone has and she will get better with age.
This thread isn't about you or your views on anything really.
Stop trying to make other people's threads about yourself. It's sickening really.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Originally posted by missvicky
Well to be truthful, your painting seems a little amaturish compared to the 4 year old abstactionist. But a good start! Keep at it you have potential........
To be truthful, you are only saying that because he confessed up front how he did it and how long it took. If that same painting came with several critiques by art critics calling it soulful genius, I bet you would be singing another song.
Originally posted by j3n9ls31dy
i find it utterly disgusting that society has come to literally praise such "prodigies" as this one.
i find it completely unrealistic to even call this child a "prodigy".
i am becoming very tired of parents taking advantage of their children for the purpose of marketing and making money.
our society has come to focus upon things like movie stars, american idol, hollywood, main stream "musicians" like the atrocious noise that blares on every radio station today. lady gaga, katy perry, JUSTIN BIEBER,
this child is no different.
sure, she is having fun, and that is perfectly great, that's what every child should do at that age.
but, her parents trying to make money and fame off of it?
she is waving around bottles of paint making a mess!
again, to the touchy people out there, i want to stress, i am not insulting what the girl is doing in any way, she is enjoying herself so much.
i am insulting the parents who are taking advantage of the situation for the financial benefits.
i am also insulting those who are primitively simplistic enough to agree with their idea of her being a "prodigy".
why are we not raising our children to be interested in renewable energy?
is this not a dilemma that their generations will undoubtedly be faced with?
are a majority of the adults today living in an ignorant bliss?
the answer is yes.
they cannot face the reality of the global situation that they, and the generations before them allowed to manifest.
I am sick and @#$! tired of the majority of generations before me, because they have not stood up and thought for themselves, but instead helped perpetrate the manipulative corruption that I, and other humans my age and under will HAVE TO FACE when the past generations are gone.
this story is just an example; the very tip top of the iceberg topic regarding the brainwashed population.
wake up people, this is a kid throwing and clapping paint all over the floor.
go fund research for radiant energy, hydrolysis, wind and solar power, or renewable energy in general.
our society has NO excess to fund this...
You know Spira, I like you. But liking you doesnt give you free reign to butcher what I am saying to suit yourself. Its an abuse of our friendship.
I never said, anywhere, that giving her paint was a mistake. And, I could not have been more clear that I think art is wonderful for 4 year olds. And I also could not have been more clear that what his mother is doing is not "enabling a genius to follow their passion" but "creating genius through trickery, deception and betrayal of their friends for their own selfish reasons."
... But Mozart really isnt the best example here for your case. Music can be objectively analyzed and someones "genius" can be ascertained. Its like math, you either hit the note, or you do not. The emotive quality, the timing, that may be a little more subjective. Were this child painting still lifes, or portraits, one could argue genius for the same reason. It would display a talent not held by other 2 or 4 year olds. Intention would be clear.
...This "style" is so subjective that critics cannot tell if an adult or a two year old made the work, and they cannot identify a recognized "genius" by his work. In other words, someone is a genius because someone with influence says they are, and other pass the title around for fear of looking like a fool if they cry, "the Emperor has no clothes" in snobby and cliquish art circles.