It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Libya is a nation of 6 Million Libyans
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Fearful of NATO, Libyans dont want to die by NATO fascist hands.
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Yes its for why you think Qatar recognized the rebels so quickly? because of the interest deals they had, just like your britian,french,italy, america.
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
And also why you think the rebels installed a Rothschild central bank so fast in east Libya during still uncertain finical crisis we are all in, when the dollar falls and which it will the banks will be worthless.
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Thats what the Western Mainstream news said during the revolutions in eupore it later turned out to be false, these aren't libyans but terrorists.
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links
Originally posted by here4awhile
those rebels over there are NOT the good guys I can tell you that much...I'm willing to bet many of them hold extremist beliefs
Because most of the Arab leaders despise Gaddafi and will take any opportunity to get rid of him. It was the Arab League that pressured the West to act, remember?
Eupore? I have no idea what you're on about. Oh, how come you can post youtube vids as evidence and expect me to believe them, when I do the same you discredit them as fakes?
Oh, how come you can post youtube vids as evidence and expect me to believe them, when I do the same you discredit them as fakes?
Amy Goodman on March 2, 2007, U.S. General Wesley Clark (Ret.), explains that the Bush Administration planned to take out 7 countries in 5 years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran (2007 upto 2012)
The unprecedented arrests came as members of the SAS and SBS were deployed in Libya in preparation for airstrikes and to liaise with rebels and identify stranded British oil workers for rescue.
The investigation is focused primarily on information relating to the war in Afghanistan against the Taliban and Al Qaeda. But it is also looking at secret information the men had access to about Libya and other countries where Special Forces have been operating.
Ah, the old "TPTB planning to take over the world" excuse..
I suggest you come up with another conspiracy, because the one you're trying to peddle doesn't stand up to logical scrutiny.
The problem with this thinking (and it seems to be thinking based solely on the last 10 years and not taking into account history) is that 50-60 years ago, the very nations you're claiming are trying to get control of the region, were in control of that region. If the plan was to take them over and steal their resources, why did we grant independance to them in the first place? Seems a bit silly, don't you think?
why did we grant independance to them in the first place?
To control the mass under TPTB spread of influence, just wondering you know who are the Rothschild, david rockefellers? the Bilderberg Group?
The Bilderberg Group are not the only ones that control us and our mainstream news, but they are very powerful and have secretive meetings, they will be having another meeting in june.
Watch This Video of the Bilderberg Group to get you started
Jim Tucker I believe is his name is a respected journalist since 1975 has been exposing the Bilderberg Group, they held secret talks on kosovo even before the war started.
The Bliderberg Group
edit on 26-5-2011 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Ah, the old "TPTB planning to take over the world" excuse..
excuse? the TPTB are already taking over the world its no wonder you dont believe it
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by dontdrinkthewater
The problem with this thinking (and it seems to be thinking based solely on the last 10 years and not taking into account history) is that 50-60 years ago, the very nations you're claiming are trying to get control of the region, were in control of that region. If the plan was to take them over and steal their resources, why did we grant independance to them in the first place? Seems a bit silly, don't you think?
Oh, btw, just because I don't subscribe to your idea of some over-arching cabal of rich folks plotting and scheming, that doesn't mean I am sheep or that I swallow the MSM. I form my own opinions based upon observable evidence and there is simply bugger all evidence of some "NWO" plot. If there is a plot, it is a pretty cack one and poorly implemented, which is doomed to fail.
I asked a simple question as to why these "NWO" types didn't seize the world when it would have been so much easier, instead of 60 years later. You have failed, totally, to address that point.
(Reuters) - Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi said on Wednesday his country and other oil exporters were looking into nationalizing foreign firms due to low oil prices and suggested Tripoli might not stick to OPEC production quotas.
The young prince came to power during World War II after an Anglo-Soviet invasion forced the abdication of his father Reza Shah. During his reign, the Iranian oil industry was nationalized under Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and Iran marked the anniversary of 2,500 years of continuous monarchy since the founding of the Persian Empire by Cyrus the Great.
The Shah's White Revolution, a series of economic and social reforms intended to transform Iran into a global power, succeeded in modernizing the nation, nationalizing many natural resources, and extending suffrage to women.
A secular Muslim himself, the Shah gradually lost support from the Shi'a clergy of Iran, particularly due to his strong policy of modernization, secularization, conflict with the traditional class of merchants known as bazaari, and recognition of Israel. Various additional controversial policies were enacted, including the banning of the communist Tudeh Party, and a general suppression of political dissent by Iran's intelligence agency, SAVAK. Amnesty International reported that in 1978 Iran had as many as 2,200 political prisoners.
Several other factors contributed to strong opposition to the Shah among certain groups within Iran, the most notable of which were the U.S. and U.K. backed coup d'état against Prime Minister Mosaddegh in 1953, clashes with Islamists, and increased communist activity. By 1979, political unrest had transformed into a revolution which, on 16 January, forced the Shah to leave Iran. Soon thereafter, the Iranian monarchy was formally abolished, and Iran was declared an Islamic republic.
The history of Liberia is unique among African nations because of its relationship with the United States. It is one of only two countries in sub-Sahara Africa, along with Ethiopia, without roots in the European Scramble for Africa. It was founded and colonized by freed American slaves with the help of a private organization called the American Colonization Society in 1821–1822, on the premise that former American slaves would have greater freedom and equality there.
Slaves freed from slave ships were also sent there instead of being repatriated to their countries of origin. These colonists formed an elite group in Liberian society, and, in 1847, they founded the Republic of Liberia, establishing a government modeled on that of the United States, naming Monrovia, their capital city, after James Monroe, the fifth president of the United States and a prominent supporter of the colonization.
A military-led coup in 1980 overthrew then-president William R. Tolbert, which marked the beginning of a period of instability that eventually led to two civil wars that left hundreds of thousands of people dead and devastated the country's economy. Today, Liberia is recovering from the lingering effects of the civil war and related economic dislocation. Statistics indicate that about 85% of the population live on less than $1.25 a day.
The name Liberia denotes "liberty".
Is this the first time evidence of child abuse by aid agency workers has come to light?
No. For years, there have been anecdotal accounts of abuse. In 1995, UNHCR guidelines specifically acknowledged that international aid workers were implicated in sexual violence against refugees.
There followed a spate of abuse reports from organisations such as Human Rights Watch. In 2002, a joint report by the UNHCR and the charity Save the Children claimed child abuse was endemic in refugee camps, highlighting allegations against 67 workers and 42 agencies involving 40 victims. CNN also reported on the subject.
A 2006 Save the Children report said up to half of Liberian children were selling sex to wealthy men, among them UN peacekeepers and aid agency staff.