It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FlySolo
Originally posted by MasterOfSparkz
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Tabloid nonsense...so, labs and actual science is tabloid to you...what do you suggest the marker should be then for substantiated claims? ouija boards and prayer? you clearly are not a fan of -actual science- since you refused to weigh in on the actual results...and instead decide to spend your time minimizing, compartmentalizing, and ignoring what is actually being presented in this thread.
Please provide substantiation for the above claims as related to your post, classy guy.
Now what are you going on about? Provide claims to what? His opinion of you and your myopic thinking? Myopic means close minded and narrow vision BTW.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by MasterOfSparkz
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Tabloid nonsense...so, labs and actual science is tabloid to you...what do you suggest the marker should be then for substantiated claims? ouija boards and prayer? you clearly are not a fan of -actual science- since you refused to weigh in on the actual results...and instead decide to spend your time minimizing, compartmentalizing, and ignoring what is actually being presented in this thread.
Please provide substantiation for the above claims as related to your post, classy guy.
Sure, go back and read the ops
then follow up on what has been concluded for now...watch the video.
until you can accomplish that task and catch up, I will treat your posts as little more than attention seeking with nothing of value to add to the discussion.
The people in the video have been established already. For the record, the guy doing the polygraph is FBI trained. So... come again?
Originally posted by MasterOfSparkz
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by MasterOfSparkz
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Tabloid nonsense...so, labs and actual science is tabloid to you...what do you suggest the marker should be then for substantiated claims? ouija boards and prayer? you clearly are not a fan of -actual science- since you refused to weigh in on the actual results...and instead decide to spend your time minimizing, compartmentalizing, and ignoring what is actually being presented in this thread.
Please provide substantiation for the above claims as related to your post, classy guy.
Sure, go back and read the ops
then follow up on what has been concluded for now...watch the video.
until you can accomplish that task and catch up, I will treat your posts as little more than attention seeking with nothing of value to add to the discussion.
So you have ZERO substantiation. Just a stupid video that ANYONE could have made up. That's science alright.
Originally posted by MasterOfSparkz
Originally posted by FlySolo
Originally posted by MasterOfSparkz
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Tabloid nonsense...so, labs and actual science is tabloid to you...what do you suggest the marker should be then for substantiated claims? ouija boards and prayer? you clearly are not a fan of -actual science- since you refused to weigh in on the actual results...and instead decide to spend your time minimizing, compartmentalizing, and ignoring what is actually being presented in this thread.
Please provide substantiation for the above claims as related to your post, classy guy.
Now what are you going on about? Provide claims to what? His opinion of you and your myopic thinking? Myopic means close minded and narrow vision BTW.
Provide substantiation for the claims he put fourth, as in SCIENCE/LAB/TESTING. Otherwise this is all just hearsay. Is that really that difficult to understand oh one of such all encompassing great vision?
Originally posted by MasterOfSparkz
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by MasterOfSparkz
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Tabloid nonsense...so, labs and actual science is tabloid to you...what do you suggest the marker should be then for substantiated claims? ouija boards and prayer? you clearly are not a fan of -actual science- since you refused to weigh in on the actual results...and instead decide to spend your time minimizing, compartmentalizing, and ignoring what is actually being presented in this thread.
Please provide substantiation for the above claims as related to your post, classy guy.
Sure, go back and read the ops
then follow up on what has been concluded for now...watch the video.
until you can accomplish that task and catch up, I will treat your posts as little more than attention seeking with nothing of value to add to the discussion.
So you have ZERO substantiation. Just a stupid video that ANYONE could have made up. That's science alright.
ok, so, his instincts kick in and he gives it a nip...not like a playful seductive nip, but a omg, being attacked, bite type. he tears off a small piece of skin and accidently swallows it. he describes it as burning...seriously not a good experience...very toxic tasting, etc.
Originally posted by FlySolo
Originally posted by MasterOfSparkz
Originally posted by FlySolo
Originally posted by MasterOfSparkz
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Tabloid nonsense...so, labs and actual science is tabloid to you...what do you suggest the marker should be then for substantiated claims? ouija boards and prayer? you clearly are not a fan of -actual science- since you refused to weigh in on the actual results...and instead decide to spend your time minimizing, compartmentalizing, and ignoring what is actually being presented in this thread.
Please provide substantiation for the above claims as related to your post, classy guy.
Now what are you going on about? Provide claims to what? His opinion of you and your myopic thinking? Myopic means close minded and narrow vision BTW.
Provide substantiation for the claims he put fourth, as in SCIENCE/LAB/TESTING. Otherwise this is all just hearsay. Is that really that difficult to understand oh one of such all encompassing great vision?
Yes grasshopper, the mighty oak will break sooner than the weeping willow. When you're done being an attention seeking child then I will address your questions grasshopper. Until then, I will leave you with this to ponder. One who looks under the bed, hides under the bed.
Originally posted by FreedomCommander
I forgot, draconians can disguise themselves well, how well I don't know. Plus why did they come in a group, sounds more like a experiment.
Originally posted by FreedomCommander
It's amazing that that man is alive and is alive after telling that story.
Originally posted by FreedomCommander
Maybe what he swallowed was some kind of hormone that gets any race high. I think what that man swallowed was a solidified part of it that was suppose to get any race to fall for them. And maybe it ended up in failure.
Originally posted by DjSuperman
I dont know why they would go through all the trouble of kidnapping him just to rape him,
Unless they were shooting a porn or something;
I think it would've been easier for them to just go to a sperm bank,
Since he said they look identical to humans
Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
reply to post by SaturnFX
First off you can already tell the 'scientific' report he reads is bogus...either its by the worlds worst lab, or its just a made up hoax. Heres why...simple logic. The line he reads from the report states (paraphrased from memory) the hair is so rare because it's from a Chinese Mongoloid (NOT from a 'pygmy btw...he only says its as unique as a pygmies) ...blah blah...then we get to it lacking color...and that being incredibly rare. The scientist speculates that the most likely scenerio is it is indeed from a tall blond (WHAT...how does he get "tall'?!?!) who possibly doesn't have pigment because she doesn't 'need' it (WHAT WHAT WHAT!!!!) What kind of Crazy conclusion is that!!! First off....there are PLENTY of people from normally dark skinned,and dark haired racial groups that have light colored hair and skin...they are called ALBINOS...they are not mysteries...they are rare but not 'incredibly' so. For the scientist to jump to a conclusion that the person with that hair must be a tall blond (!) and might not 'need' protection from the sun (implying something out of this world) strikes me as.......at the very least...INCREDIBLY inept. That alone makes me SERIOUSLY doubt any of the other 'info' from this guys so called 'scientific' report. I can say I boinked a few giant nordic alien bimbo's too...then print out a bunch of official looking 'scientific' documents 'proving' that fact! Then I could just as easily call up the 'Disclosure' group and have em videotape an interview with me no problem. Then I'd just sit back and laugh with my buddies at the bar while we watch the video.edit on 25-5-2011 by bhornbuckle75 because: