reply to post by consigliere
Now don't get me wrong I'm a conspiracy theorist to the heart, and maybe I'm reading too much into this,,,,or am I? What do you think?
reading too much into it with no research. After the Apollo missions no manned space missions have gone past low earth orbit.
its funny too, the people who think we have cant cover over half the gaping holes in the story, nobody can actually prove beyond reasonable doubt that
we have
no it's funny that the people who think we didn't ignore all the facts and base their assumption that we couldn't on bad science, like the Van Allen
Belts, go google Van Allen and see what HE has to say about the belts.
but I'm supposed to ignore the ample video evidence, radio telescope evidence, retrieved matter from the moons surface evidence, reflecting mirrors
evidence.
i have to agree, the evidence FOR the moon mission can't prove 100% that we went there (to an idiot that is) but the evidence we didn't go is simply
non-existant.
And sure I'm a "debunker" so obviously NASA has paid me to say this, because YOU GUYS are that important. but in reality, I didn't believe 100%
either, and watched all the movies:
"funny thing happened on the way to the moon" (sly editing tricks)
"astronauts behaving badly" (second part of the first movie, but quite funny)
and a bunch of others. I spent hours, if not days, of my life scouring the information:
Photos that show "wires" holding the astronauts up (it's a radio antenna)
Photos that show areas in shadow with detail visible (it's called ambient light idiots)
Van allen belts (see Van Allens own statement on this. Short? "Completely absurd")
Technology involved (pfft that same technology put up satellites and countless other things)
Nasa 'slips' (again, for these to be proof they require the reader to be ignorant of basic facts like the OP was)
Props and fake rocks (I see an artifact, they see a "C" making it a prop, they also see a face on mars, go figure)
Now... there are a few things I could dismiss, but they don't immediately make the moon missions hoaxes:
some images show things overlapping the cross hairs that are on the camera, which is impossible
At least 1 video shows the same backdrop from another mission but claims it was in an entirely different area (nasa said this was merely a filing
error)
the real sticker, which actually made me look into this field, was that the video we all know of the moon landing, was sent to NASA in high quality.
They would not share this feed, instead, they set up a projector, projecting the image on a screen, and the video we've all seen was taped from
that.
There is absolutely no reason for that. There is no reason to ensure the only video of the first man stepping onto the moon, is the worst possible
quality.
So evidence we went to the moon? Plenty
Evidence we didn't? Non existent, simply is not there.
Now there are very good reasons TO fake it, but reasons aren't evidence.
edit on 25-5-2011 by phishyblankwaters because: (no reason given)
Side note, I find it interesting that some of the same people who say "This astronaut saw a UFO so they are real" and believe it, refuse to believe
the astronauts that went to the moon, and say they did. Amazing.
edit on 25-5-2011 by phishyblankwaters because: (no reason given)
Just love quotes like that from people with NO EXPERTISE that basically open their mouths and let their belly rumble!
?
