It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Karbofos
Why is that so difficult? They practiced it, on Earth using a similar set up. The exact time of lift-off was known....you anticipate, and react ahead of time.
Watch a clock second-hand tick....do something 3 to 4 seconds before a certain point.
What's so difficult about understanding this????
DO all "Hoax Believers" disengage their brains, out of their need to "believe" in utter nonsense?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Karbofos
Huh????
The "practice" I mentioned was the timing of operating the camera!!!
Allowing for time delay, and seeing the way the camera moves, when it tilted up (or, pans as needed) and the zoom...you can see, he needed to zoom back, as part of the camera sequence of moves.
It begins with a "tight" shot (parlance, in the film biz) and after the ascent engine ignites, the camera zooms out (to widen the field of view), and pans upwards, to follow the LM....really, it's like I'm explaining why water flows down a drain......how more basic does it have to be, before comprehension dawns??
*Please edit the quoted portion to the salient material needed to make your point!
There is no need to repeat entire posts within the body of your response*
LM never flew before, they knew exact speed of a tilt?
Originally posted by spy66
I still think there is something odd about the falling slope of the sand which the Rover spins up. It is to sharp.
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by spy66
I still think there is something odd about the falling slope of the sand which the Rover spins up. It is to sharp.
That's actually what one would expect in a vacuum. It's actually proof (really good proof) that they were on the moon. It seems to me that a lot of this apollo hoax belief stems from incorrect expectations about what it should have looked like in the pictures and video.edit on 27-5-2011 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by spy66
NO, That its not what you would have expected in a vacuum. In a vacuum the sand and dust would travel a lot further because of less resistance and less gravity.
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by spy66
NO, That its not what you would have expected in a vacuum. In a vacuum the sand and dust would travel a lot further because of less resistance and less gravity.
The lack of air resistance means its path is purely ballistic and it will not travel as far as it would on earth; on earth dust lingers in the air, allowing it to travel much farther.